How to Investigate the Copyright Status of a Work 6
For copyright investigations, the following points about the impact of the Copyright Act of 1976,
the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988, and the Copyright Renewal Act of 1992 should
be considered.
A Changed System of Copyright Formalities
Some of the most sweeping changes under the 1976 Copyright Act involve copyright formalities,
that is, the procedural requirements for securing and maintaining full copyright protection. The old
system of formalities involved copyright notice, deposit, and registration; recordation of transfers
and licenses of copyright ownership; and
U. S. manufacture, among other things. In general, while
retaining formalities, the 1976 law reduced the chances of mistakes, soened the consequences of
errors and omissions, and allowed for the correction of errors.
The Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 reduced formalities, most notably making
the addition of the previously mandatory copyright notice optional. It should be noted that the
amended notice requirements are not retroactive.
The Copyright Renewal Act of 1992, enacted June 26, 1992, automatically extends the term of
copyrights secured between January 1, 1964, and December 31, 1977, making renewal registration
optional. Consult Renewal of Copyright (
Circular 6A) for details. For additional information, contact
the Copyright Oce by phone at (202) 707-3000 or 1-877-476-0778 (toll free).
Automatic Copyright
Under the present copyright law, copyright exists in original works of authorship created and xed
in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be
perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly, or indirectly with the aid of a
machine or device. In other words, copyright is an incident of creative authorship and is not
dependent on statutory formalities. Thus, registration with the Copyright Oce generally is not
required, but there are certain advantages that arise from a timely registration. For further
information on the advantages of reg istration, see Copyright Basics (
Circular 1.)
Copyright Notice
The 1909 Copyright Act and the 1976 Copyright Act as originally enacted required a notice of
copyright on published works. For most works, a copyright notice consisted of the symbol ©, the word
“Copyright” or the abbreviation “Copr.,” together with the name of the owner of copyright and the year
of rst publication. For example: “© Joan Crane 2004” or “Copyright 2008 by Abraham Adams.”
For sound recordings published on or aer February 15, 1972, a copyright notice might read
“π 1994
XYZ Records, Inc.” See below for more information about sound recordings.
For mask works, a copyright notice might read “µ
SDR Industries.” See Federal Statutory
Protection for Mask Works (
Circular 100), for more information.
As originally enacted, the 1976 law prescribed that all visually perceptible published copies of
a work, or published phonorecords of a sound recording, should bear a proper copyright notice.
This applies to such works published before March 1, 1989. Aer March 1, 1989, notice of copyright
on these works is optional. Adding the notice, however, is strongly encouraged and, if litigation
involving the copyright occurs, certain advantages exist for publishing a work with notice.
Prior to March 1, 1989, the requirement for the notice applied equally whether the work was
published in the United States or elsewhere by authority of the copyright owner. Compliance with
the statutory notice requirements was the responsibility of the copyright owner. Unauthorized
publication without the copyright notice, or with a defective notice, does not aect the validity of
the copyright in the work.