borrower, ABC estimated it would receive $100,000, excluding the value of the associated
servicing rights, if the underlying loan was funded and sold in the secondary market on that day.
Because this amount is equal to the notional amount of the loan, ABC would not experience a
gain or loss on the sale of the underlying loan (before considering the effect of the loan
origination fees and costs associated with the loan). As such, the fair value of this derivative
loan commitment would be zero, and there would not be any unrealized gain or loss at the
inception of the derivative loan commitment. This may not be true for all derivative loan
commitments.
ABC defers all unrealized gains and losses at the inception of its derivative loan commitments
until the underlying loans are sold. ABC’s policy is based on the short-term nature of its
derivative loan commitments and was adopted in order to not accelerate the timing of gain
recognition. As this practice may not be appropriate for all derivative loan commitments or other
derivatives initially accounted for under EITF 02-3 and due to the lack of authoritative guidance
in this area, institutions should consult with their accounting advisors concerning the appropriate
accounting for their specific agreements.
After applying the methodology described above to individual derivative loan commitments,
ABC aggregates the fair values of the derivative loan commitments by type (i.e., fixed,
adjustable, and floating) and by whether the commitments have above, at, or below market rates.
The fair values of the fixed derivative loan commitments with above market rates, adjusted for
the appropriate pull-through rate, total $21,000
[C], which represents an asset. The aggregate fair
value of the fixed derivative loan commitments that have at or below market rates, adjusted for
the appropriate pull-through rate, sums to ($31,000)
[D], which represents a liability. For the
adjustable derivative loan commitments, the aggregate fair value, adjusted for the pull-through
rate, is approximately ($2,000)
[E], which is also a liability. The fair value of the floating
derivative loan commitments approximates zero.
ABC also estimates the fair value of its forward loan sales commitments outstanding at the end
of the month using a similar methodology as that described above. Based upon this information,
ABC determines that the estimated fair value of the forward loan sales commitments related to
its derivative loan commitments and warehouse loans with above market rates is approximately
($45,000)
[F], which represents a liability, because current market interest rates for comparable
mortgage loans are lower than the rates in effect when the derivative loan commitments were
initiated. (Consequently, current offered delivery prices for similar commitments are greater
than the delivery prices of ABC’s existing forward loan sales commitments. Therefore, the
change in the fair value of ABC’s forward loan sales commitments since they were entered into
represents a loss.) The fair value of ABC’s forward loan sales commitments related to its
derivative loan commitments and warehouse loans with at or below market rates is estimated to
be $50,000
[G], which is an asset.
24
24
The absolute value of the fair value of the forward loan sales commitments is greater than the absolute value of
the fair value of the related derivative loan commitments because the forward loan sales commitments also apply to,
and act as an economic hedge of, ABC’s warehouse loans. ABC accounts for its warehouse loans at the lower of
cost or fair value in accordance with FAS 65. In this example, ABC does not apply hedge accounting to its
warehouse loans.
Date: May 3, 2005
Page 14