!
In!many!state s,!scien tific!exp ert!tes tim on y!is!now!subject!to!this! ?1"=/,2!
standard.!!But!some!states!still!use!a!modification!of!the!B,</!standard.!
W36!5+1!<4/B4!+<!+1!4Z,4/-!M6/41<05!<504154!N0-14<<!+-!
56./-]!!!
Over!the!years,!evidence!presented!at!trial!has!grown!increasingly!difficult!
for!the!ave ra g e!ju ro r!to !un d e rsta n d .!!By !ca lling !o n!a n !ex p ert !w itn e ss!who!can !
discuss!complex!evidence!or!testing!in!an!easy`to`understand!manner,!trial!
lawyers !ca n!b et ter!p re se nt !the ir!ca se s!an d !jur or s!ca n !be !be tte r!eq u ipp e d!to !
weigh!the!evidence.!But!this!brings!up!additional!difficult!questions.!How!
does!the!court!define!whether!a!person!is!an!expert?!What!qualifications!
must!they!meet!to!provide!their!opinion!in!a!court!of!law ?!
These!questions,!too,!are!addressed!in!b4C>!K>!AB0C>!Ja@.!!It!only!allo ws!
experts!“qualified!…!by!knowledge,!skill,!experience,!training,!or!education.“!!
To!be!considered!a!true!expert!in!any!field!generally!requires!a!significant!
level!of!trainin g !an d !ex pe rien c e.!Th e !va rio us !fore n sic!d iscip lin es!fo llo w !
different!training!plans,!but!most!include!in`house!training,!assessments!and!
practical!exams,!and!continuing!education.!Oral!presentation!practice,!
includin g!moot!co u rt !ex p erience!(simulated!courtroom!proceeding),!is!very!
helpful!in!preparing!examiners!for!questioning!in!a!trial.!!
Normally,!the!individual!that!issued!the!laboratory!report!would!serve!as!the!
expert!at!court.!By!issuing!a!report,!that!individual!takes!responsibility!for!
the!analysis.!This!perso n!co uld!b e!a!su perv isor!or!tec hn ical!lead er,!but!
doesn’t!necessarily!need!to!be!the!one!who!did!the!analysis.!The!opposition!
may!also!call!in!experts!to!refute!this!testimony,!and!both!witnesses!are!
subject!to!the!standard!in!use!by!that!court!(B,</A%?1"=/,2,!Fed.!R.!Ev id!702) !
regarding!their!expertise.!!!
Each!court!can!accept!any!person!as!an!expert,!and!there!have!been!
instance s!where!in d iv idu a ls !w h o !la ck !p ro p e r!tra in in g!a n d !ba c kg ro u n d !h av e !
been!declared!experts.!When!necessary,!the!opponent!can!question!potential!
witnesses!in!an!attempt!to!show!that!they!do!not!have!applicable!expertise!
and!are!not!qualified!to!testify!on!the!topic.!!The!admissibility!decision!is!left!
to!the!judge.!
PCC0-061+7!K4<6./54<!
F.S705+-061<?!
Saferstein,!Richard.!$K("()P8('\($'?!!P)!()\K%:&$\(%)!\%!b%KA)'($!
'$(A)$A,!Pear s o n !Educa t io n ,!I n c .,!U pper!S a d d l e !River,!N J!( 2 0 07).!
McClure,!David.!Report:!Focus!Group!on!Scientific!and!Forensic!Evidence!in!
the!Courtroom !(o nline),!20 07,!