Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
JA NUARY 2017
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
Table of Contents
Glossary .......................................................................................................................................... ii
I. Introduction and Summary of Findings .............................................................................. 1
II. Why Personal Auto Insurance?........................................................................................... 3
III. Auto Insurance and State Requirements – the Basics......................................................... 4
IV. Auto Insurance Availability and Uninsured Drivers .......................................................... 6
Figure 1: Number of Personal Auto Insurers in Each State.................................................... 6
Figure 2: Percentage of Uninsured Drivers by State .............................................................. 7
V. Factors Affecting Affordability .......................................................................................... 7
VI. Calculating the Affordability Index .................................................................................... 8
A. Who Are Affected Persons?................................................................................................ 8
Figure 3: Concentration of Affected Persons as Percentage of U.S. Population .................... 9
B. Defining Affordability ........................................................................................................ 9
C. How to Calculate the Affordability Index ........................................................................ 10
D. Data Sources and Limitations ........................................................................................... 10
VII. The Affordability of Personal Auto Insurance for Affected Persons:
Findings and Observations................................................................................................ 11
A. Findings and Summary of Analysis .................................................................................. 11
Figure 4: AP ZIP Codes and Affordability Index Values Above Two Percent by State ...... 12
Figure 5: Financial Responsibility Limits, Based on Median Family Income ..................... 13
Figure 6: Financial Responsibility Limits, Based on Minority Concentration ..................... 14
B. Illustrations ....................................................................................................................... 14
1. California .................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 7: California ZIP Code Analysis ............................................................................... 15
2. Florida......................................................................................................................... 15
Figure 8: Florida ZIP Code Analysis .................................................................................... 16
3. Illinois ......................................................................................................................... 16
Figure 9: Illinois ZIP Code Analysis .................................................................................... 17
4. New York ................................................................................................................... 17
Figure 10: New York ZIP Code Analysis ............................................................................. 18
VIII. Next Steps ......................................................................................................................... 19
IX. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 19
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
i
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
Glossary
Affected Persons
Affordability Index
AP ZIP Codes
BI
..........
..........
..........
..........
Traditionally underserved communities and
consumers, minorities, and low- and moderate-
income persons
Personal automobile insurance affordability index
as described in this Study
ZIP Codes in which Affected Persons are the
majority
Bodily injury liability insurance coverage
FIO
..........
Federal Insurance Office
FR Limits
..........
Financial Responsibility Limits, i.e., state
mandatory minimum requirements for personal
auto insurance
LMI
..........
Low- and moderate- income
MFI
..........
Median family income
MSA
..........
Metropolitan Statistical Area
NAIC
..........
National Association of Insurance Commissioners
PD
..........
Property damage liability insurance coverage
PIP
Study
..........
..........
Medical payments and personal injury protection
insurance coverage
This Study on the Affordability of Personal
Automobile Insurance
UM
..........
Uninsured Motorist insurance coverage
UIM
..........
Underinsured Motorist insurance coverage
ZIP Code
.........
U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
ii
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
I. Introduction and Summary of Findings
When establishing the Federal Insurance Office (FIO) within the U.S. Department of the
Treasury, Congress tasked FIO with, among other things, monitoring the extent to which
traditionally underserved communities and consumers, minorities, and low- and moderate-
income (LMI) persons have access to affordable insurance products for all lines of insurance
(except health insurance).
1
Congress recognized that minorities and LMI persons and
communities could be at a higher risk from financial downturns than other groups within the
United States, and designed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of
2010 to ensure federal monitoring of consumers’ access to affordable insurance products.
2
With
this awareness, and in recognition of the importance of affordable, accessible insurance products
to individuals and families in the United States, FIO previously has written about access to
insurance and other consumer protection concerns.
3
This Report constitutes FIO’s first insurance affordability study, focusing on automobile
insurance for individual consumers. This first annual Study on the Affordability of Personal
Automobile Insurance (Study) provides an objective, quantifiable, national perspective on auto
insurance affordability for traditionally underserved communities and consumers, minorities, and
LMI persons (collectively, Affected Persons).
Section II explains why affordable auto insurance is critically important to consumers, and
describes the public notice and comment process used to help determine the Study’s definitions
and metrics. After outlining some basic insurance terms and concepts, Section III summarizes
state personal auto insurance requirements since, of course, the business of insurance in the
United States – including auto insurance – is regulated primarily at the state level.
4
Section IV
discusses auto insurance availability, as well as how the numbers of uninsured drivers can affect
auto insurance affordability. Section V discusses other factors that can affect affordability.
Section VI explains how the Affordability Index is calculated; discusses Affected Persons and
affordability; outlines how to calculate the Affordability Index; and describes the underlying data
and its limitations. Section VII provides the Study’s findings, including a state-by-state
summary of results and illustrative state examples. Section VIII concludes with additional
observations and next steps.
1
See 31 U.S.C. § 313(c)(1)(B).
2
See Press Release: Waters Wins Big for Consumers, Homeowners, Minorities and Shareholders in Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Legislation (June 30, 2010), available at https://waters.house.gov/media-
center/press-releases/waters-wins-big-consumers-homeowners-minorities-and-shareholders-wall . See also
156 CONG. REC. H5242 (June 30, 2010) (The Federal Insurance Office, we will be asking them to gather
information about the ability of minorities and low income persons to access affordable insurance products.”)
(statement of Maxine Waters).
3
These FIO reports are available at https://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/fio/reports-and-notices and include: How to
Modernize and Improve the System of Insurance Regulation in the United States (December 2013); Annual Report
on the Insurance Industry (September 2014); Report Providing an Assessment of the Current State of the Market for
Natural Catastrophe Insurance in the United States (September 2015); Annual Report on the Insurance Industry
(September 2015), and Report on Protection of Insurance Consumers and Access to Insurance (November 2016)
(Consumer Report).
4
See, e.g., the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1011; the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6711.
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
1
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
In brief, this Study calculates and reports the results of an Affordability Index which, following
extensive consultation and analysis, FIO has defined as the ratio of the average annual written
personal automobile liability premium in the voluntary market to the median household income
(based on U.S. Census Bureau data) for U.S. Postal Service ZIP Codes in which Affected
Persons are 50 percent or more of the population (AP ZIP Codes). For the purposes of this
analysis, personal auto insurance is presumed unaffordable within an AP ZIP Code if its
Affordability Index is above two percent.
5
As described in more detail in Section VII, the
United States has 9,172 AP ZIP Codes in which Affected Persons are the majority population, or
approximately 28 percent of all of the ZIP Codes nationwide. Auto insurance has Affordability
Index values above two percent in 845 AP ZIP Codes nationwide; those 845 AP ZIP Codes have
an aggregate population of over 18.6 million. Affordability Index results for each AP ZIP Code
are available at www.treasury.gov/initiatives/fio/reports-and-notices.
Using the information provided in this Study, consumers and policymakers will be able to assess
the affordability of personal auto insurance for Affected Persons within each state and the
District of Columbia, at the ZIP Code level. Given the wide variations among states, any
interstate comparisons should be made with great caution: the Affordability Index allows for
comparison of ZIP Codes within the same state, but should not be considered for interstate
analysis. Also, the Study is limited to auto insurance affordability for Affected Persons.
Importantly, however, even for Affected Persons the Affordability Index is not intended to
provide guidance for individual insurance budgeting or affordability for specific individuals.
Due to the range of unique personal characteristic and variance among state laws and
regulations, the Affordability Index is not appropriate for measuring the affordability of an auto
insurance premium paid by any one person. Rather, the Affordability Index is designed for the
purpose of gaining a better understanding of auto insurance affordability for Affected Persons,
collectively, at the ZIP Code level.
This Study is based on premium and related data that is publicly available and/or that was
voluntarily provided by states and statistical agents.
6
The underlying data, therefore, does not
include all U.S. auto insurance policies. More data will be available for the next study, when all
large auto insurers will be asked to voluntarily produce premium data through the appropriate
statistical agent.
7
As more data is analyzed and year-to-year trends become visible, annual study
results are likely to provide more insights into industry trends and developments.
5
Monitoring Availability and Affordability of Auto Insurance, 81 Fed. Reg. 45,372 (July 13, 2016) (July 2016
Notice). See also Monitoring Availability and Affordability of Auto Insurance, 79 Fed. Reg. 19,969 (Apr. 10, 2014)
(April 2014 Notice), and Monitoring Availability and Affordability of Auto Insurance, 80 Fed. Reg. 38,277 (Jul. 2,
2015) (July 2015 Notice).
6
With some state-specific exceptions, property and casualty insurers generally are required by state law to send
premium and claims/loss data to statistical agents, who then compile the data for state insurance departments; the
states, in turn, use the reported information to ensure that insurance rates meet statutory standards and to monitor the
insurance market. See, e.g., Independent Statistical Service, Statistical reporting made simple, available at
http://www.iss-statistical.net/subscriber-home/home
; National Independent Statistical Service, About Statistical
Reporting, available at https://www.niss-stat.org/HTML/AboutStatisticalReporting.aspx; Verisk Analytics,
Statistical Service, available at http://www.verisk.com/capabilities/data-and-statistical-services/statistical-service-
reporting-insurance-data-to-iso.html.
7
See Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 81 Fed. Reg. 45,381 (July 13, 2016) (Collection Request).
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
2
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
II. Why Personal Auto Insurance?
This Study focuses on personal auto insurance because affordable auto insurance can promote
financial security for individuals and families. Auto ownership is associated with greater
opportunity for economic well-being, such as better access to employment opportunities.
8
For
example, one researcher found that “transit only enables [low-income] commuters to reach less
than one-third of metro-wide jobs within 90 minutes while the automobile enables them to reach
all jobs in the 51 largest metropolitan areas within 60 minutes.”
9
Furthermore, nearly all states require a driver or owner of a motor vehicle to have automobile
liability insurance or financial security that may be satisfied by auto liability insurance while
operating a motor vehicle, or at the time of registering a motor vehicle.
10
(Section III provides
additional information about states’ auto insurance requirements). Commentators have observed
that “[u]naffordable auto insurance leaves many Americans in the predicament of either not
driving, which dramatically restricts their economic opportunities, or driving without insurance,
which not only is illegal but puts them and other drivers at risk.”
11
Finally, insurance stakeholders often disagree about whether auto insurance has become more or
less affordable for Affected Persons over time.
12
In light of the above factors, FIO published a request for information regarding: (1) a reasonable
and meaningful definition of affordability for personal auto insurance; (2) appropriate metrics
and data for monitoring the extent to which Affected Persons have access to affordable auto
insurance; and (3) sources to use for data monitoring auto insurance affordability for Affected
Persons.
13
After reviewing the responses to the initial information request, FIO published for
comment a proposed framework for measuring the affordability of personal auto insurance for
Affected Persons.
14
After carefully considering all of the comments received, and in conjunction
with additional research and consultation, FIO published a notice advising of the adoption of a
8
See Clifford Winston, “On the Performance of the U.S. Transportation System: Caution Ahead,” Journal of
Economic Literature, Vol. 51, No. 3, at 805 (2013), available at https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/
jel.51.3.773.
9
Id.
10
See, e.g., Insurance Information Institute, Compulsory Auto/ Uninsured Motorists (July 2016), available at
http://www.iii.org/issue-update/compulsory-auto-uninsured-motorists.
11
Consumer Federation of America et al. Comment, at 1 (August 31, 2015), available at
http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=TREAS-DO-2015-0005-0014.
12
See, e.g., Insurance Research Council, Trends Indicate Auto Insurance is Becoming More Affordable for All
Income Groups (Aug. 25, 2015), available at http://www.insurance-
research.org/sites/default/files/downloads/Trends%20in%20Auto%20Insurance%20Affordability%20NR_FINAL.p
df, and compare with Stephen Brobeck and J. Robert Hunter, “No Increase in Affordability of Auto Insurance for
Low- and Moderate-Income Households,” Consumer Federation of America (Sept. 2, 2015), available at
http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/150921_CES_affordability_brobeckhunter.pdf. See also July 2016 Notice, supra
note 5, 81 Fed. Reg. at 45,373.
13
April 2014 Notice, supra note 5, 79 Fed. Reg. at 19,969-19,970.
14
July 2015 Notice, supra note 5, 80 Fed. Reg. at 38,277 et seq.
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
3
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
methodology to monitor the affordability of personal auto insurance for Affected Persons,
15
which is summarized in Section VI.
III. Auto Insurance and State Requirements the Basics
Auto insurance provides protection against loss arising from the operation, maintenance, or use
of automobiles covered by the insurance, for the potential benefit of insured car owners,
passengers, drivers, and others.
16
Personal automobile insurance covers private passenger vehicles (as distinct from commercial
vehicles). Private passenger autos generally are four-wheel motor vehicles (other than trucks)
that are either owned or leased under contract for six months or more, including cars and
SUVs.
17
Personal auto insurance can consist of one or more types of coverage to pay specified
types of loss, subject to the insurance policy’s terms, conditions and exclusions, including the
following:
Personal Liability insurance covers bodily injury (BI) costs associated with injuries and
death, and property damage (PD) such as damage to structures or another car caused by
the insured owner or other driver of the insured car.
Uninsured Motorist (UM) coverage reimburses the insured car owner when an auto
accident is caused by an uninsured motorist, or for hit-and-run accidents.
Underinsured Motorist (UIM) coverage pays an insured car owner’s costs when another
driver has insufficient insurance to pay all accident costs.
Collision insurance coverage reimburses the insured car owner for damages to the car
that results from a collision with another vehicle or other object (such as a tree or
guardrail) when the owner is at fault for the accident.
Comprehensive coverage insures against theft as well as damage caused to an insured car
by an incident other than a collision such as flood, vandalism, hail, falling trees, or other
hazards.
15
July 2016 Notice, supra note 5, 81 Fed. Reg. at 45,372 et seq.
16
See, e.g., Florida Division of Consumer Services, Personal Automobile Insurance Overview, available at
http://www.myfloridacfo.com/Division/Consumers/UnderstandingCoverage/PersonalAutoInsuranceOverview.htm.
17
See, e.g., Rosalie L. Donlon & Christine G. Barlow, “Personal auto policies: 5 questions agents should ask
buyers,” PropertyCasualty360 (Nov. 30, 2016), available at
http://www.propertycasualty360.com/2016/11/30/personal-auto-policies-5-questions-agents-should-
a?eNL=583f2aab160ba0a472aeecc5&utm_source=PC360_Daily&utm_medium=EMC-
Email_editorial&utm_campaign=11302016&page_all=1.
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
4
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
Medical Payments or Personal Injury Protection (PIP) provides reimbursement for the
insured driver’s and passengers’ medical expenses from injuries caused by an accident,
regardless of who is at fault.
18
Except for New Hampshire, all states require consumers to maintain personal liability
automobile insurance as a condition for registering and driving a car. Currently 17 states also
have mandatory PIP requirements, and 20 states require UM and/or UIM coverage.
Comprehensive and collision insurance usually are optional. Statesminimum requirements for
personal liability coverage are generally known as financial responsibility limits (FR Limits).
FR Limits requirements vary considerably by state.
19
The personal auto insurance marketplace, broadly speaking, has three segments based on risk
profile categories: (1) the standard market, which consists of all drivers except those in the non-
standard market and the residual market; (2) the non-standard market, which usually includes
high risk drivers such as new drivers, drivers with moving violations, drivers with rare or
unusual cars, or drivers with more frequent incidences of insurance policy cancellation or non-
renewal; and (3) the residual market, which generally includes drivers with the highest risk of
submitting a claim. Generally, premiums are highest in the residual market, followed by the
non-standard market, and of course the lowest premiums are in the standard market.
20
Standard
and non-standard markets together comprise the “voluntary” market, as distinct from the residual
market.
21
The Affordability Index assesses personal liability auto insurance and personal injury protection
coverage, at FR Limits, in the voluntary market, for Affected Persons, as described in greater
detail in Section VI.
18
See, e.g., Insurance Information Institute, Auto Insurance BasicsUnderstanding Your Coverage, available at
http://www.iii.org/article/auto-insurance-basics-understanding-your-coverage.
19
See, e.g., Insurance Information Institute, Compulsory Auto/ Uninsured Motorists, supra note 10.
20
See, e.g., July 2015 Notice, supra note 5, 80 Fed. Reg. at 38,820 & fn. 38. Insurers do not have a universal
method for determining market placement: different insurers may offer the same driver standard and non-standard
market rates. See, e.g., July 2016 Notice, supra note 5, 81 Fed. Reg. at 45,373.
21
See July 2016 Notice, supra note 5, 81 Fed. Reg. at 45,377.
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
5
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
-
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
IV. Auto Insurance Availability and Uninsured Drivers
The personal auto insurance market generated $199.9 billion in total direct premiums in 2015,
representing about 38.4 percent of all property and casualty insurance net premiums.
22
Nearly
900 personal auto insurers conduct business in part or all of the United States.
23
No state has
fewer than 50 auto insurers, and 45 states have at least 100 insurers offering coverage for private
vehicles (see Figure 1).
24
Figure 1: Number of Personal Auto Insurers in Each State
50-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200 250
Source: SNL Financial
Despite the existence of a competitive marketplace, nearly 30 million uninsured drivers drove on
U.S. roads in 2012.
25
The percentage of uninsured drivers in the total U.S. population generally
has declined over the last five years for which data is available.
26
Notably, lower-income drivers
are more likely to be uninsured, which could indicate a correlation with affordability.
27
Figure 2
shows the percentage of uninsured drivers by state as of 2012.
28
22
See SNL, P&C Industry: U.S. P&C Business Overview, available at
https://www.snl.com/web/client?auth=inherit#statIndustry/pcIndustry?KeyStatEntity=E61858CD-F1F9-42BD-
8848-8CB6B42ED2FE.
23
See SNL Financial. See also Property Casualty Insurers Association of America Comment, at 10 (August 13,
2015) (PCI Comment) (citations omitted), available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=TREAS-
DO-2015-0005-0006.
24
See SNL Financial. See also PCI Comment, supra note 23, at 10.
25
See Insurance Research Council, New Study Reveals a Declining Trend in the Percentage of Uninsured Motorists
(August 5, 2014), available at http://www.insurance-
research.org/sites/default/files/downloads/IRC%20UM_NewsRelease_1.pdf.
26
See id.
27
See Consumer Federation of America, Uninsured Drivers: A Societal Dilemma in Need of a Solution, at 5 (March
2013) (citing own analysis and collecting sources), available at
http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/140310_uninsureddriversasocialdilemma_cfa.pdf
.
28
Insurance Information Institute, Uninsured Motorists, available at http://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/uninsured-
motorists (citing Insurance Research Council). See also Cecile Holton, “How the States Rank on Uninsured
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
6
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
Figure 2: Percentage of Uninsured Drivers by State
0-5%
5-10%
10-15%
15-20%
20-25%
25%+
Source: Insurance Information Institute
The reasons for the numbers of uninsured drivers – and the widely varying percentages by state –
are beyond the scope of this Study. However, Uninsured Motorist (UM) claimsi.e., claims
paid by an insurer even though the insured was not at fault – are one of the many factors that can
affect premium pricing and, thereby, affect the affordability of personal auto insurance.
Additional factors affecting affordability are discussed in Section V.
V. Factors Affecting Affordability
Numerous activities, trends, and pricing factors at both the macro (state/national) and micro
(individual consumer) levels may affect personal auto insurance affordability.
At the state and national levels, factors affecting the price of an auto insurance premium include:
state law and regulation such as required FR Limits and whether the state mandates PIP
coverage;
29
state programs which offer low-cost auto liability insurance or help low-income and
other drivers obtain more affordable auto insurance;
30
accidents involving uninsured drivers
which can contribute to higher premium costs for insured drivers;
31
health and safety measures
Drivers,” carinsurance.org, available at http://www.carinsurance.org/2011/04/how-the-50-states-rank-on-
uninsured-drivers_408.
29
See, e.g., Insurance Information Institute, No-Fault Auto Insurance in Florida: Trends, Challenges and Costs
(January 2011), available at http://www.insuringflorida.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/No-Fault-
Paper_0125111.pdf.
30
See e.g., California Dep’t of Insurance, California’s Low Cost Auto Insurance, available at
https://mylowcostauto.com/; State of New Jersey Dep’t of Banking & Insurance, Special Automobile Insurance
Policy (SAIP), available at http://www.state.nj.us/dobi/division_consumers/insurance/saip.htm; Haw. Rev. Stat. §
431:10C-407, available at http://law.justia.com/codes/hawaii/2010/division2/ title24/chapter431/431-10c-407/;
Michigan Dept of Insurance and Financial Services, Your Guide to Automobile Insurance, available at
https://www.michigan.gov/documents/difs/Auto_Insurance_ Guide_448003_7.pdf.
31
See, e.g., “Why Auto Insurance in Detroit is So Damn High, Explained,” Daily Detroit (Oct. 19, 2015), available
at http://www.dailydetroit.com/2015/10/19/why-car-insurance-detroit-so-high-explained/.
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
7
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
such as highway safety initiatives, the increasing use of collision avoidance technology in motor
vehicles, and health care reform which can promote cost-savings and reduce insurance
premiums; medical utilization rates;
32
and the prevalence of crime such as auto theft and
insurance fraud.
33
For individual consumers, numerous additional pricing factors can affect affordability. Pricing
factors may include the amount of coverage purchased and premium bundling discounts, such as
discounts offered when purchasing auto and home insurance from the same insurer. In addition,
depending on the state, insurers typically consider numerous additional factors in determining
personal auto insurance premiums, including: driving record; age; gender; marital status;
education; occupation; type of car insured; and location of residence which may affect the
probability of accidents (often higher in more densely populated areas with more cars on the
road), as well as the likelihood of damage from natural hazards (such as when a region is prone
to hail or flooding).
34
Academics have highlighted how state insurance anti-discrimination laws
vary significantly, and that many states’ insurance laws do not explicitly restrict insurers’ ability
to discriminate on the basis of race, national origin or religion.
35
VI. Calculating the Affordability Index
A. Who Are Affected Persons?
Affected Persons are defined by LMI and majority-minority ZIP Codes which serve as proxies
for capturing both rural and urban traditionally underserved communities.
36
For the purpose of
calculating the Affordability Index, a ZIP Code is deemed majority-minorityif the minority
population within that ZIP Code – including “Black American, Native American, Hispanic
American, or Asian American”
37
– exceeds 50 percent of the total population of that ZIP Code.
Similarly, a low-income ZIP Code has a median family income (MFI) less than 50 percent of the
32
See Insurance Research Council, Auto Insurance Affordability Problems Linked to Underlying Cost Drivers (June
21, 2016), available at http://www.insurance-research.org/sites/default/files/downloads/NRcostdrivers2016.pdf
(finding medical utilization rates above national norms in 8 of the 12 least affordable auto insurance systems).
33
See, e.g., Insurance Information Institute, Insurance Fraud (January 2016), available at http://www.iii.org/issue-
update/insurance-fraud; Insurance Research Council, Insurance Research Council Finds that Fraud and Buildup
Add Up to $7.7 Billion in Excess Payments for Auto Injury Claims (Feb. 3, 2015), available at
http://www.insurancefraud.org/downloads/ InsuranceResearchCouncil02-15.pdf. By some measures, auto insurance
fraud costs the average family $400-$700 in additional premiums every year. See, e.g., EMC Corp., Making Sense
of Today’s Insurance Market: Bringing Business and IT Together to Drive Growth, Boost Revenue, and Reduce
Costs, at 9 (March 2013), available at
https://www.emc.com/collateral/white-papers/making-sense-of-todays-
insurance-market-wp.pdf.
34
For more on insurance pricing and risk classification, see, e.g., FIO, Consumer Report, supra note 3.
35
See, e.g., Ronen Avraham, Kyle D. Logue, and Daniel Schwarcz, “Understanding Insurance Antidiscrimination
Laws,” 87 S. C
AL. L. REV. 195 (2013-2014); Ronen Avraham, Kyle D. Logue and Daniel Schwarcz, “Towards a
Universal Framework for Insurance Anti-Discrimination Laws,21 C
ONN. L.J. 1 (2014-2015).
36
For more on defining Affected Persons, see the July 2016 Notice, supra note 5, 81 Fed. Reg. at 45,377 et seq.
37
31 U.S.C. § 313(c)(1)(B) (incorporating by reference the definition established in 12 U.S.C. § 1811, note).
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
8
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
median income for the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) for that ZIP Code, while a moderate-
income ZIP Code has an MFI of at least 50 percent of the MSA median income but less than 80
percent of the MSA median income.
38
Figure 3 shows the concentration of Affected Persons
within each state.
Figure 3: Concentration of Affected Persons as Percentage of U.S. Population
0-10%
10-20%
20-30%
30-40%
40-50%
50%+
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey
B. Defining Affordability
The average U.S. household spends approximately two percent of its annual income on personal
automobile insurance,
39
a ratio critical to the definition of affordability as used in FIO’s
Affordability Index.
The Affordability Index was developed to provide a single number representing affordability
within a geographic area based on ZIP Codes, thereby simplifying the effort to compare
affordability. Specifically, the Affordability Index is a ratio defined as the average annual
written personal automobile liability premium in the voluntary market divided by the median
household income for ZIP Codes identified as being majority-minority or majority-LMI.
40
Personal auto liability insurance is presumed to be affordable within a particular ZIP Code if the
Affordability Index is equal to or less than the (approximate) national average of two percent.
41
38
See July 2015 Notice, supra note 5, 80 Fed. Reg. at 38,280; Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA) Performance Ratings, available at https://www5.fdic.gov/crapes/peterms.asp; July 2016
Notice, supra note 5, 81 Fed. Reg. at 45,378 et seq.
39
Specifically, the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Expenditure Survey found that, in 2013 and 2015,
consumers spent about 1.8 percent of average income (after taxes) on vehicle insurance. See Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Consumer Expenditure Survey, available at http://www.bls.gov/cex/
.
40
July 2016 Notice, supra note 5, 81 Fed. Reg. at 45,375.
41
Id.
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
9
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
Of course, national averages can mask wide variations. A recent report showed that the average
state premium for a full-coverage auto insurance policy varied from a low of $808 per year in
Maine to a high of $2,738 in Michigan.
42
Insurance premiums unsurprisingly span a wide range
of price points given the state-by-state variability in affordability factors (discussed in Section
V). For this reason, among others, the Affordability Index and its results are best used only for
intrastate comparisons, rather than to compare one state with another, and are not intended to
provide insight on the affordability (or not) for any individual consumer.
C. How to Calculate the Affordability Index
In essence, the Affordability Index measures personal auto insurance expenditures relative to
income. Specifically, the Affordability Index assesses personal liability auto insurance and
personal injury protection coverage, at FR Limits, in the voluntary market, for Affected Persons,
as compared to median household income.
Calculating the Affordability Index requires multiple steps and data sets. Data from the Census
Bureau, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, and the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development was used to identify the 9,172 ZIP Codes in which Affected
Persons are the majority population (AP ZIP Codes) (i.e., the majority-minority and the majority-
LMI ZIP Codes) and for which the Affordability Index would be calculated. Then, using the
available data, the average premium for policies at the FR Limits in the voluntary market in each
AP ZIP Code was calculated. Next, using Census Bureau data, the median household income in
each AP ZIP Code was identified. Finally, for each AP ZIP Code, the average annual written
personal automobile liability insurance premium in the voluntary market was divided by the
median household income.
43
D. Data Sources and Limitations
This is the first use of the FIO Affordability Index, and conclusions drawn from this study should
be limited because FIO was unable to analyze comprehensive premium data for all auto
insurance policies issued in the fifty states and the District of Columbia. Subject to
confidentiality protections and the use of aggregated data, the Study relied upon data with ZIP
Code level vehicle counts and premium data for most states for many (but not all) policies in the
voluntary market written at the applicable state FR Limits, with policy inception dates between
July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015. Available premium data included BI and PD coverage, and PIP
coverage for states where it is mandatory, but excluded UM and UIM coverage. The California
Department of Insurance provided data (BI and PD basic limit premium and exposure data for
calendar year 2012 for the entire state), as did the Texas Department of Insurance (ZIP Code
level premium data for its top reporting groups for the policy year ending December 31, 2015).
However, because the California and Texas regulator data covered a different time period than
42
Mark Vallett, “Car insurance rates by state, 2016 edition,” insure.com (last updated Mar. 2, 2016), available at
http://www.insure.com/car-insurance/car-insurance-rates.html.
43
The Affordability Index components are discussed in more detail in the July 2016 Notice, supra note 5, 81 Fed.
Reg. 45,372.
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
10
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
the rest of the data, the tabulated results are premised only upon the premium data from 2014-
2015.
Developing a single number index to represent a topic as complicated as personal auto insurance
affordability is a challenging endeavor. Some of the challenges include: (1) ZIP Code level
premium data for every ZIP Code in the United States are unavailable; (2) using ZIP Codes
rather than census tracts
44
which generally better identify specific communities, but for which
the premium data is unavailable; (3) ZIP Codes with low populations have a greater possibility
of skewing results (which the Study addressed by omitting ZIP Codes with fewer than 100
residents); (4) ZIP Codes with low vehicle counts, which also have a greater possibility of
skewing results (which the Study addressed by excluding ZIP Codes with fewer than 20 reported
vehicles with insurance policies at the FR Limit); (5) atypical ZIP Codes, such as military bases,
transportation facilities, and others (which the Study addressed through vehicle-to-population
analysis); and (6) newly-created ZIP Codes, which could not be evaluated due to lack of detailed
demographic data.
45
VII. The Affordability of Personal Auto Insurance for Affected Persons:
Findings and Observations
A. Findings and Summary of Analysis
Subject to the definitions and data limitations described above, 9,172 ZIP Codes were identified
as AP ZIP Codes (i.e., majority LMI and/or majority-minority ZIP Codes), representing
approximately 28 percent of the 32,452 ZIP Codes analyzed nationwide.
All states have AP ZIP Codes, and most states have one or more AP ZIP Codes with an
Affordability Index above two percent. The cost of auto insurance exceeds the Affordability
Index in 845 AP ZIP Codes, with over 18.6 million residents (over 9 percent of all AP ZIP Codes
nationwide). Given varying state laws, insurance requirements, and insurance markets, these
results are best interpreted only on an intrastate basis. A detailed summary of the Study’s
findings and non-confidential data, listing each AP ZIP Code and whether the Affordability
Index is above or below two percent (or data was insufficient), is available at
www.treasury.gov/initiatives/fio/reports-and-notices.
Figure 4 provides an overview of the Affordability Index results for each state. The table first
shows the total number of ZIP Codes within each state. Then, for each state’s AP ZIP Codes, it
44
A “census tract” is an area, roughly equivalent to a neighborhood, which the Census Bureau uses for analyzing
population data. See U.S. Census Bureau, Geographic Terms and Concepts Census Tract, available at
http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/gtc/gtc_ct.html
.
45
The Auto Insurance C/D Working Group of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is
considering asking state insurance regulators to collect and examine more “granular” data on auto insurance
affordability and availability. See, e.g., NAIC, 2016 Fall National Meeting: Auto Insurance (C/D) Working Group
(for December 10, 2016), available at
http://naic.org/meetings1612/cmte_c_d_auto_insurance_wg_2016_fall_nm_materials.pdf?1480986907413
.
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
11
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
lists the number of AP ZIP Codes within that state, the percentage of the state’s ZIP Codes that
are AP ZIP Codes, the total population of AP ZIP Codes within the state, and the percentage of
the state’s population within the AP ZIP Codes. Finally, the table shows the total number and
percentage of the state’s AP ZIP Codes with an Affordability Index above two percent, the
state’s population within those AP ZIP Codes, and that population’s percentage of the total
number of Affected Persons within the state.
Figure 4: AP ZIP Codes and Affordability Index Values Above Two Percent by State
State
# All
ZIP
Codes
Total
#
AP ZIP Codes Generally
% State
ZIP
Codes
Total
Population
% State
Pop.
AP ZIP Codes Affordability Index > 2%
Total
#
% State
AP ZIP
Codes
Total
Population
% State
Pop.
AK
238
160
67.2%
157,014
21.6%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
AL
642
229
35.7%
1,478,597
30.7%
11
4.8%
52,273
3.5%
AR
591
170
28.8%
569,706
19.3%
7
4.1%
17,125
3.0%
AZ
405
166
41.0%
2,456,770
37.4%
13
7.8%
198,707
8.1%
CA
1,763
893
50.7%
24,915,144
65.5%
6
0.7%
98,417
0.4%
CO
525
123
23.4%
1,292,051
24.9%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
CT
282
51
18.1%
1,049,902
29.2%
19
37.3%
434,518
41.4%
DC
53
12
22.6%
408,414
64.4%
3
25.0%
143,984
35.3%
DE
67
7
10.4%
146,590
16.0%
3
42.9%
82,333
56.2%
FL
983
323
32.9%
7,921,414
40.9%
95
29.4%
2,856,314
36.1%
GA
735
294
40.0%
4,518,269
45.6%
10
3.4%
188,235
4.2%
HI
94
81
86.2%
1,340,036
96.2%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
IA
934
118
12.6%
393,351
12.8%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
ID
278
54
19.4%
113,121
7.1%
1
1.9%
913
0.8%
IL
1,383
286
20.7%
4,226,070
32.8%
10
3.5%
78,455
1.9%
IN
775
142
18.3%
1,412,167
21.6%
4
2.8%
38,460
2.7%
KS
698
111
15.9%
536,093
18.6%
4
3.6%
32,417
6.0%
KY
768
231
30.1%
890,428
20.4%
99
42.9%
429,806
48.3%
LA
515
183
35.5%
1,539,121
33.5%
44
24.0%
604,509
39.3%
MA
537
94
17.5%
1,862,527
28.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
MD
468
146
31.2%
2,701,458
45.9%
10
6.8%
334,269
12.4%
ME
432
55
12.7%
120,135
9.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
MI
987
195
19.8%
2,369,870
24.0%
77
39.5%
1,706,039
72.0%
MN
885
137
15.5%
829,108
15.4%
5
3.6%
95,275
11.5%
MO
1,024
268
26.2%
1,512,925
25.1%
24
9.0%
349,448
23.1%
MS
423
203
48.0%
1,108,069
37.1%
4
2.0%
9,546
0.9%
MT
361
103
28.5%
93,051
9.2%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
NC
808
277
34.3%
3,233,072
33.2%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
ND
383
47
12.3%
60,908
8.7%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
NE
581
90
15.5%
295,529
15.9%
3
3.3%
46,694
15.8%
NH
248
47
19.0%
261,362
19.8%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
NJ
595
143
24.0%
3,438,632
38.7%
82
57.3%
2,309,120
67.2%
NM
368
228
62.0%
1,354,026
65.2%
5
2.2%
2,845
0.2%
NV
175
64
36.6%
1,395,364
50.5%
6
9.4%
223,268
16.0%
NY
1,794
403
22.5%
8,657,611
44.2%
115
28.5%
5,233,053
60.4%
OH
1,197
277
23.1%
2,650,639
22.9%
41
14.8%
503,008
19.0%
OK
648
166
25.6%
850,198
22.3%
4
2.4%
34,350
4.0%
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
12
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
State
# All
ZIP
Codes
AP ZIP Codes Generally
Total
#
% State
ZIP
Codes
Total
Population
% State
Pop.
AP ZIP Codes Affordability Index > 2%
Total
#
% State
AP ZIP
Codes
Total
Population
% State
Pop.
OR
417
68
16.3%
537,993
13.8%
4
5.9%
76,739
14.3%
PA
1,798
354
19.7%
2,585,456
20.3%
35
9.9%
1,067,469
41.3%
RI
77
11
14.3%
274,741
26.1%
6
54.5%
171,402
62.4%
SC
424
192
45.3%
1,594,317
33.7%
7
3.6%
9,720
0.6%
SD
371
89
24.0%
105,274
12.6%
1
1.1%
1,349
1.3%
TN
629
172
27.3%
1,735,983
26.9%
12
7.0%
167,167
9.6%
TX
1,935
801
41.4%
14,512,014
55.6%
32
4.0%
873,405
6.0%
UT
288
58
20.1%
356,561
12.5%
3
5.2%
14,943
4.2%
VA
896
298
33.3%
2,728,933
33.3%
7
2.3%
7,908
0.3%
VT
255
45
17.6%
102,499
16.4%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
WA
598
164
27.4%
1,488,096
21.6%
5
3.0%
29,378
2.0%
WI
774
117
15.1%
921,005
16.1%
4
3.4%
93,626
10.2%
WV
706
191
27.1%
247,597
13.4%
24
12.6%
18,725
7.6%
WY
178
35
19.7%
46,074
8.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
Total
32,989
9,172
27.8%
115,395,285
36.7%
845
9.2%
18,635,212
16.1%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, and premium data
While the Affordability Index considers premium price for FR Limits, it appears that many, if
not most, consumers purchased auto insurance policies with coverage limits above the mandated
minimum requirements. The data reveals generally that the lower a family’s median income, the
more likely the family purchases auto insurance at FR Limits (Figure 5). A similar relationship
appears between the purchase at FR Limits and majority-minority ZIP Codes (Figure 6).
Figure 5: Financial Responsibility Limits, Based on Median Family Income
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, and premium data
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Policies at FR Limit
Market Share
Lower Income Concentration
Higher Income Concentration
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
13
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
Figure 6: Financial Responsibility Limits, Based on Minority Concentration
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Policies at FR Limit
Market Share
Higher Minority Concentration
Lower Minority Concentration
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, and premium data
States with a higher number of AP ZIP Codes with an Affordability Index above two percent
also appeared to correlate with states having mandatory PIP coverage requirements and states
having higher percentages of uninsured drivers. Although other factors are also relevant, the
characteristics of the state-required insurance coverage (such as the presence or absence of PIP)
and the number of uninsured drivers may both contribute to AP ZIP Codes having a higher ratio
of insurance costs to income.
B. Illustrations
For illustration purposes, the following paragraphs describe results from the four states with the
largest populations in each census region: California (West), Florida (South), Illinois (Midwest),
and New York (Northeast).
46
1. California
California has over 38 million residents, of whom approximately 66 percent (about 24.9 million
residents) live in 893 AP ZIP Codes. Less than one percent of all AP ZIP Codes in the state (6
AP ZIP Codes) have an Affordability Index value above two percent. Fewer than one hundred
thousand Californians reside in AP ZIP Codes with Affordability Index values greater than two
percent.
California insurance requirements apply to all vehicles operated or parked on California
roadways. The minimum liability insurance requirements are $15,000 for BI per person and
$30,000 per occurrence, as well as $5,000 for PD coverage.
47
The percentage of uninsured drivers in California was approximately 14.7 percent as of 2012.
48
California ranked 13 out of the 50 states plus the District of Columbia with respect to the
percentage of uninsured drivers.
49
46
In these examples, Florida replaced Texas, the largest population state in the South, because of data limitations.
47
See California Insurance Code § 115801.1b. See also State of California Department of Motor Vehicles,
Financial Responsibility (Insurance) Requirements for Vehicle Registration (FFVR 18), available at
https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/pubs/brochures/fast_facts/ffvr18
.
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
14
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
On average, according to one survey, a 40-year old man with a clean driving record and good
credit would pay $1,752 per year for car insurance in California, 32 percent above the national
average.
50
Notably, as discussed above (in Section V), California has a low-cost auto insurance
program designed to provide liability car insurance at affordable rates to income-eligible
drivers.
51
In addition, among other related laws and regulations, California prohibits
consideration of ZIP Codes in setting auto insurance rates.
52
Figure 7 summarizes the analysis of California ZIP Codes: the first chart shows all California
ZIP Codes (including the approximately 50 percent that are AP ZIP Codes); the second chart
focuses on AP ZIP Codes alone to show that less than one percent have an Affordability Index
greater than two percent. For the AP ZIP Codes for which sufficient premium data was
available, the Affordability Index results in California range from a low of 0.12 percent to a high
of 3.00 percent; the median result is 0.66 percent and the average is 0.58 percent.
Figure 7: California ZIP Code Analysis
50%
0%
45%
5%
AP
AP with
Index>2%
Non-AP
Unknown
99%
1%
All California ZIP Codes
AP ZIP Codes Only
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, and premium data
2. Florida
Florida has over 19 million residents, of whom nearly 41 percent (7.9 million residents) live in
323 AP ZIP Codes. Nearly 30 percent of all AP ZIP Codes in Florida (95 AP ZIP Codes) have
an Affordability Index value above two percent. Over 2.8 million Floridians reside in AP ZIP
Codes with Affordability Index values above two percent.
The state of Florida requires every vehicle with four or more wheels to maintain Florida auto
insurance coverage. Florida requires at least $10,000 PIP and $10,000 PD coverage. Drivers
48
Insurance Information Institute, Uninsured Motorists, supra note 28.
49
Id.
50
Vallett, supra note 42 (emphasizing that actual premiums would vary depending on individual driving factors).
51
California Dep’t of Insurance, California’s Low Cost Auto Insurance, supra note 30.
52
See 10 Cal. Code Regs. tit. 10, § 2632.5 (enumerating mandatory and optional rating factors which do not include
ZIP codes except with respect to relative claims frequency which may be measured based on grouping zip codes or
census tracts in the state).
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
15
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
with previous accidents or violations may be required to also carry at least $10,000 BI per person
and $20,000 BI per occurrence.
53
The percentage of uninsured drivers in Florida was approximately 23.8 percent in 2012, the
second highest uninsured driver rate in the nation (ranked 2 out of 50 states plus the District of
Columbia with respect to the percentage of uninsured drivers).
54
On average, according to one survey, a 40-year old man with a clean driving record and good
credit would pay $1,654 per year for car insurance in Florida, 25 percent above the national
55
average.
Figure 8 summarizes the analysis of Florida ZIP Codes: the first chart shows all Florida ZIP
Codes (including the approximately 32 percent that are AP ZIP Codes); the second chart focuses
on AP ZIP Codes alone to show that approximately 29 percent have an Affordability Index
greater than two percent. For the AP ZIP Codes for which sufficient premium data was
available, the Affordability Index results in Florida range from a low of 0.42 percent to a high of
5.15 percent; the median result is 1.69 percent and the average is 1.81 percent.
Figure 8: Florida ZIP Code Analysis
All Florida ZIP Codes
AP ZIP Codes Only
23%
9%
65%
2%
AP
AP with
Index>2%
Non-AP
Unknown
71%
29%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, and premium data
3. Illinois
Illinois has nearly 13 million residents, of whom approximately one-third (over 4.2 million
residents) live in 286 AP ZIP Codes. Based on an analysis of approximately 25 percent of
Illinois premium data, fewer than four percent of the state’s total AP ZIP Codes (10 AP ZIP
Codes) have an Affordability Index value above two percent. Based on the available data, fewer
53
DMV Florida, Florida Car Insurance Information, available at http://www.dmvflorida.org/auto-insurance.shtml.
See also Fla. Stat. §§ 324.022, 627.736.
54
Insurance Information Institute, Uninsured Motorists, supra note 28 (citing Insurance Research Council). See
also Steve Bousquet, “Car insurance rates skyrocket as Floridians drive more and crash more,” Miami Herald (May
20, 2016), available at http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article78819742.html
.
55
Vallett, supra note 42 (emphasizing that actual premiums would vary depending on individual driving factors).
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
16
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
than 80,000 Illinois residents live in AP ZIP Codes with an Affordability Index value above two
percent.
Illinois requires all motor vehicle owners to have insurance limits of at least $25,000 BI per
person and $50,000 per occurrence, as well as $20,000 in PD coverage. UM coverage is also
mandatory.
56
The percentage of uninsured drivers in Illinois is approximately 13.3 percent as of 2012. Illinois
ranked 20 out of 50 states and the District of Columbia with respect to the percentage of
uninsured drivers.
57
On average, according to one survey, a 40-year old man with a clean driving record and good
credit would pay $1,035 per year for car insurance in Illinois, 22 percent below the national
58
average.
Figure 9 summarizes the analysis of Illinois ZIP Codes: the first chart shows all Illinois ZIP
Codes (including the approximately 21 percent that are AP ZIP Codes); the second chart focuses
on AP ZIP Codes alone to show that approximately 3 percent have an Affordability Index greater
than two percent. For the AP ZIP Codes for which sufficient premium data was available, the
Affordability Index results in Illinois range from a low of 0.38 percent to a high of 3.50 percent;
the median result is 1.00 percent and the average is 1.11 percent.
Figure 9: Illinois ZIP Code Analysis
20%
1%
78%
1%
AP
AP with
Index>2%
Non-AP
Unknown
97%
3%
All Illinois ZIP Codes
AP ZIP Codes Only
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, and premium data
4. New York
New York has nearly 20 million residents, of whom approximately 44 percent (over 8.6 million)
live in 403 AP ZIP Codes. About 28 percent of the state’s total AP ZIP Codes (115 AP ZIP
56
See Illinois Dep’t of Insurance, Shopping for Automobile Insurance (Jan. 2015) (citing 625 ILCS 5/7601; 625
ILCS 5/7-203), available at http://insurance.illinois.gov/autoinsurance/shopping_auto_ins.asp.
57
Insurance Information Institute, Uninsured Motorists, supra note 28.
58
Vallett, supra note 42 (emphasizing that actual premiums would vary depending on individual driving factors).
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
17
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
Codes), have an Affordability Index value above two percent. Approximately 5.2 million New
York state residents live in AP ZIP Codes with an Affordability Index value above two percent.
In order to satisfy state financial responsibility requirements and register a car, consumers must
purchase PIP coverage, as well as limits of at least $25,000 BI per person, $50,000 for BI to two
or more persons, and $100,000 for injuries resulting in the death of two or more persons. The
minimum limit of coverage for PD liability protection in New York is $10,000 per accident. All
auto insurance policies must provide UM coverage for bodily injury.
59
The percentage of uninsured drivers in New York was approximately 5.3 percent as of 2012, the
third-lowest uninsured driver rate in the country (ranked 49 out of the 50 states plus the District
of Columbia with respect to the percentage of uninsured drivers).
60
On average, according to one survey, a 40-year old man with a clean driving record and good
credit would pay $1,050 per year for car insurance in New York, 21 percent below the national
61
average.
Figure 10 summarizes the analysis of New York ZIP Codes: the first chart shows all New York
ZIP Codes (including the approximately 22 percent that are AP ZIP Codes); the second chart
focuses on AP ZIP Codes alone to show that approximately 28 percent have an Affordability
Index greater than two percent. For the AP ZIP Codes for which sufficient premium data was
available, the Affordability Index results in New York range from a low of 0.46 percent to a high
of 8.83 percent; the median result is 1.49 percent and the average is 1.95 percent.
Figure 10: New York ZIP Code Analysis
All New York ZIP Codes
AP ZIP Codes Only
16%
6%
72%
6%
AP
AP with
Index>2%
Non-AP
Unknown
72%
28%
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, and premium data
59
New York State Dep’t of Financial Services, Shopping for Auto Insurance: Minimum Auto Insurance
Requirements, available at http://www.dfs.ny.gov/consumer/auto/auto1202.htm.
60
Insurance Information Institute, Uninsured Motorists, supra note 28.
61
Vallett, supra note 42 (emphasizing that actual premiums would vary depending on individual driving factors).
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
18
________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Study on the Affordability of Personal Automobile Insurance (January 2017)
VIII. Next Steps
Numerous related and complex factors can affect personal auto premium pricing and
affordability. By providing a numeric index that will be readily comparable over time, this
Study intends to provide an objective basis for measuring the affordability of personal auto
insurance for Affected Persons. This first analysis provides an initial indication that
approximately 18.6 million Americans live where auto insurance costs more than the
Affordability Index ratio of two percent of median household income.
This Study analyzed thousands of population and premium data points nationwide to provide a
national ZIP Code-level analysis of personal auto insurance affordability for Affected Persons
using the Affordability Index. The Study thereby provides baseline measurements that
policymakers, regulators, and consumers can use for future national, objective, quantifiable
comparisons of changes in auto insurance affordability over time.
IX. Conclusion
FIO previously published notice of a proposed collection of data documents from the largest auto
insurers nationwide.
62
FIO currently is reviewing comments in response to that notice, and
anticipates that, in 2017, it will collect more data from larger auto insurers. FIO will not collect
this data directly, but looks forward to working with insurers through statistical agents to
perform the aggregation exercise. Data from these large insurers would permit a more
comprehensive affordability analysis that would be more meaningful to stakeholders.
Specifically, the additional data will be used to supplement and update this Study; refine the
calculation of the Affordability Index; and allow for evaluation of trends and changes in personal
auto insurance affordability for Affected Persons.
FIO will continue to monitor auto insurance affordability and report its findings. The Study is
necessarily qualified in its analysis because this is a first-ever exercise. As more data is
gathered, and more feedback is provided, results will be refined in future studies with the
objective of providing improved insight.
62
Collection Request, 81 Fed. Reg. 45,381, supra note 7.
FEDERAL INSURANCE OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
19