2016 Mississippi College- and Career-Readiness Standards for English Language Arts
199
richness and complexity to communicate effectively with mature readers. An AP English
Language and Composition course should help students move beyond such programmatic
responses as the five-paragraph essay that provides an introduction with a thesis and three
reasons, body paragraphs on each reason, and a conclusion that restates the thesis. Although
such formulaic approaches may provide minimal organization, they often encourage
unnecessary repetition and fail to engage the reader. Students should be encouraged to place
their emphasis on content, purpose and audience and to allow this focus to guide the
organization of their writing.
College writing programs recognize that skill in writing proceeds from students’ awareness of
their own composing processes: the way they explore ideas and draft and revise their work.
This experience of the process of composing is the essence of the first-year writing course, and
the AP English Language and Composition course should emphasize this process, asking
students to write essays that proceed through several stages or drafts, with revision aided by
teacher and peers. Although these extended, revised essays are not part of the AP Exam, the
experience of writing them will help make students more self-aware and flexible writers and
thus may help their performance on the exam itself. The various AP English Language Released
Exams and AP Central® (www.apcentral.collegeboard.com) provide sample student essay
responses to exercises that can be useful as timed writing assignments and as the basis for
extended writing projects.
An AP English Language and Composition course may be organized in a variety of ways. It might
be organized thematically around a group of ideas or issues, using a variety of works and
examining rhetorical strategies and stylistic choices. A course focusing on the theme of liberty,
for example, might use such writers as John Stuart Mill, Frederick Douglass, Toni Morrison,
Susan B. Anthony, Joseph Sobran, Elie Wiesel, Emile Zola and Mary Wollstonecraft to examine
the wealth of approaches to subject and audience that these writers display. Another possibility
is to organize a course around sequences of assignments devoted to writing in particular forms
(argumentative, narrative, expository) or to group readings and writing assignments by form,
theme or voice, asking students to identify writers’ strategies and then practice them
themselves. Still another alternative is to use genre as an organizing principle for a course,
studying how the novel, compared to the autobiography, offers different possibilities for
writers, and how classical debate or argument influences us in ways that are not the same as
those used in consensus building. The study of language itself — differences between oral and
written discourse, formal and informal language, historical changes in speech and writing — is
often a productive organizing strategy for teachers.
Whatever form the course takes, students write in both informal and formal contexts to gain
authority and learn to take risks in writing. Imitation exercises, journal keeping, collaborative
writing and in-class responses are all good ways of helping students become increasingly aware
of themselves as writers and of the techniques employed by the writers they read. As well as
engaging in varied writing tasks, students become acquainted with a wide variety of prose
styles from many disciplines and historical periods and gain understanding of the connections
between writing and interpretive skill in reading (see the AP English Language and Composition
Teacher’s Guide for ideas on readings and sample curricula). Concurrently, to reflect the