By Norman C. Gysbers, Ph.D., Curators’ Professor, University of Missouri – Columbia
S
chool counseling is 100-plus years old. It evolved shaped by various
economic, social and educational forces guided by the work of many
individuals. The ASCA National Model, first published in 2003
and now in its fourth edition, is a product of this evolution. By embracing
knowledge from the past, we can learn how school counseling evolved
from a position, to a service, to a program, the organizational concept
embedded in the ASCA National Model. By welcoming the future we can
combine the insights gained from the past with new knowledge, enabling
us to continue to develop and fully implement comprehensive school coun-
seling programs in every school district in the country.
School counseling as we know it today
began as vocational guidance in the early
1900s. It was established in schools as a
position occupied by administrators and
teachers. No organizational structure was
provided other than a list of duties. In the
1920s school counseling began to change,
shaped by the mental hygiene, psycho-
metric and child study movements. As a
result, a more clinically oriented approach
to school counseling emerged. This sig-
naled a shift away from economic issues
to psychological issues with an emphasis
on counseling for personal adjustment.
During the 1930s, discussion took place
concerning the various personnel respon-
sible for school counseling, the duties
they performed, and their selection and
training. A major mile-stone occurred
with the creation of a new organizational
structure called pupil personnel services.
Within that structure, the concept of
guidance services emerged. The field of
school counseling had moved from a
position with a list of duties to a position
with a list of duties organized by guidance
services all under the overall structure of
pupil personnel services.
The 1940s and 1950s saw the expan-
sion and extension of counseling in the
schools. The literature during years
1941–1945 focused on contributions
to the war effort. After 1945, attention
returned to the need for counseling in
the schools and on ways to improve
the services provided. The selection and
training of school counselors also received
attention and support with the passage
of the Vocational Education Act of 1946
and the National Defense Education Act
(NDEA) of 1958. In addition, the Amer-
ican School Counselor Association was
established in 1952.
A major issue being debated in the 1960s
and 1970s concerned the nature of school
counseling. Was it more psychological in
nature featuring counseling as a major
intervention? Was it more educational
in nature featuring a broader array of
interventions including counseling but
also information, assessment, place-
ment and follow-up activities? Although
school counseling at the elementary level
had been discussed previously, it wasn’t
until the 1960s that it became a reality.
NDEA, amended in the 1960s, stimulated
training practices and procedures that set
elementary school counseling apart from
secondary school counseling. The 1960s
and 1970s also witnessed increasing con-
cern about the services model of school
Early 1900s
Vocational guidance begins in
secondary schools as a position without
an organizational structure
1920s
School counseling shifts from
vocational guidance to counseling for
personal adjustment
1930s
The concept of guidance services
emerges as part of pupil personnel
services
1940s/1950s
Federal legislation in 1946 and
1958 significantly increases school
counseling training and the number of
positions
1952
American School Counselor
Association formed
1960s
School counseling takes root in
elementary schools
1960s/1970s
Concept of a program for school
counseling begins to take shape
TIMELINE
EMBRACE THE PAST, WELCOME
THE FUTURE: A BRIEF HISTORY
OF SCHOOL COUNSELING
counseling. Calls for change came from
a variety of sources ending up in the be-
ginning development of a comprehensive
program approach to school counseling.
The concept of a program for school
counseling began to take form in the
1960s and 1970s and then became a
major way to organize and manage
school counseling in the schools in the
1980s, 1990s and into the 21st century.
During this time many states developed
state models. Training programs to help
personnel in school districts plan, design
and implement comprehensive school
counseling programs also were initiated.
The role and functions of school counsel-
ors was of concern during the 1980s and
1990s. Some writers advocated the role
of human development specialist; others
recommended the role of change agent.
Predominating roles were coordinating,
counseling and consulting. Tied to the
role and function issue was the issue of
terminology. Is it guidance, guidance and
counseling or school counseling?
Although progress was made in develop-
ing, implementing and evaluating compre-
hensive school counseling programs in the
first decade of the 21st century, discussion
continued about program purposes and
the work of school counselors. Should the
focus be educational (academic), voca-
tional (career) or social/emotional (mental
health)? Some writers focused on academ-
ic achievement and career but not social/
emotional or mental health. Other writers
urged the opposite with mental health
issues needing more attention. Still other
writers urged the adoption of a holistic
approach emphasizing attention to all
three areas.
During this same decade discussion about
program purposes and school counselors’
roles continued with some writers empha-
sizing an advocacy change agent focus.
Others talked about the need to emphasize
collaboration. Still others recommend-
ed school counselors do more indirect
work and less direct work with students.
Finally there was a movement for school
counselors to become more data-oriented,
using data to identify school concerns and
student needs.
The development and implementation of
school counseling programs across the
country grew in the first decade of the
21st century. This growth was stimulated
by the publication of the ASCA National
Model in 2003 and its adoption by many
states and school districts. A second
edition was published in 2005, followed
by a third edition in 2013 and the fourth
edition in 2019.
As the second decade of the 21st cen-
tury began, an ongoing issue for school
counseling was accountability. Although
this has been part of professional dis-
cussion since the 1920s, and much work
was done over the ensuing years, there
is a renewed sense of urgency today
concerning accountability. The literature
makes it clear that evaluation is here to
stay and needs to be designed and carried
out to not only demonstrate effectiveness
but also to improve the work of school
counselors.
What will the next 100 years be like? No
one knows for sure, but if the next 100
years are like the first 100 years, school
counseling will continue to evolve. The
forces that shaped school counseling so
far will continue to do so, and discus-
sion about purposes and organization
will continue. So, while no one knows
what the future holds, current literature
suggests that at least for the near future
students and their parents in school
districts across the country will continue
to benefit from having fully implemented
school counseling programs. Embrace the
past, welcome the future.
This article was adapted from material in
Gysbers, N. C. (2010), Remembering the Past,
Shaping the Future: A History of School Counsel-
ing. Alexandria, VA: American School Counselor
Association.
1980s/1990s
The role and functions of school
counselors is of concern; many
states adopt state models for school
counseling programs
2001
Federal legislation acknowledges the
terminology switch from guidance
counselor to school counselor and
the importance of the role of the
elementary school counselor
2003
ASCA releases a national school
counseling program model, the ASCA
National Model, providing consistency
to standardize school counseling
programs across the country
2003–Present
Many states and districts adopt the
ASCA National Model as their model
for school counseling programs
2005
ASCA National Model, second edition,
adds the theory behind the ASCA
National Model
2013
ASCA National Model, third edition,
is the first major revision to the ASCA
National Model
2019
ASCA National
Model, fourth
edition, streamlines
and clarifies
language to reflect
the current state of
education