World Language Common Assessments
Common assessments are a powerful tool for improving the quality of learning for all students. Common
assessments align curriculum and assessment and provide teachers with shared outcomes for instruction
and shared knowledge and understanding of what it means to meet a standard. The most powerful impact of
common assessments, however, comes from the sharing of student results and determining the
effectiveness of instruction. By examining student responses, teachers determine if any student was more or
less successful than other students. Probing further, teachers seek to find what they can learn from student
successes and what changes, if any, they want to make in their instruction. Through such collaboration,
teachers share information, create knowledge, share that knowledge, shape that knowledge into best
practices, and pass along the practices to others.
Superior completion of the
task;
Ideas well developed and well
organized
Clear awareness of audience
and purpose
Above average word count
Text readily comprehensible,
requiring no interpretation on the part
of the reader
Easily understood by a native
speaker
Paragraph length
discourse
variety of cohesive devices
Successfully uses more
sophisticated, varied sentence
patterns
Correct in their usage
Rich use of
vocabulary
Some idiomatic
expressions
Vivid language
May use figurative
language and imagery
Control of basic
language structures
occasional correct
use of advanced
language structures
Very few or no
mechanical errors
relative to the length or
complexity
Advanced completion of the
task
Clear awareness of audience
and purpose
Above average word count
Text comprehensible
Logical order (sequenced)
Subtle transitions
Provides closure
Understood by a native speaker
Few errors in structure or
usage
Moderately successful in
using more sophisticated
sentence patterns
Effective
vocabulary
Generally
successful in using rich
language
Control of basic
language structures
attempts at use of
advanced language
structures
Few mechanical
errors relative to length
or complexity
Completion of the task
ideas adequately developed
Awareness of audience and
purpose
average word count
Text comprehensible, requiring
minimal interpretation on the part of
the reader
Minor lapses in order or
structure (some breaks in
sequencing)
Contrived transitions
Provides closure
Understood by a native speaker
Emerging paragraph
length discourse; variety of
cohesive devices
Attempts to use more
sophisticated sentence patterns
Acceptable and
accurate
use of vocabulary
for this level
Attempts to use rich
language
Control of basic
language structures
Some mechanical
errors that do not
interfere with
communication
Partial completion of the task
ideas somewhat developed
Some awareness of audience
and purpose
Repetitive or too general
below average word count
Text mostly comprehensible,
requiring interpretation on the part of
the reader
Poor transitions
Random sequencing
Attempts closure
Shift in focus
Understood by a sympathetic
native speaker
Variety of discreet
sentences
some cohesive devices
Errors in structure or
usage interfere with meaning
Over-reliance on simple or
repetitive constructions
Somewhat
inadequate and/or
inaccurate use of
vocabulary
Vocabulary too
basic for this level
Emerging control of
basic language
structures
Some mechanical
errors that do interfere
with communication
Minimal completion of the task
Content underdeveloped
Poor awareness of audience
or purpose
Ideas and details are not clear
below average word count
Text barely comprehensible
Thought patterns are difficult to
follow
Ideas are not clear or
sequenced
Resembles free-writing,
rambling
No closure attempts
Barely understood by a
sympathetic native speaker
lists of discrete sentences
some repetition
few cohesive devices
No sentence variety
Serious errors in structure
or usage
Too brief to demonstrate
variety
Simplistic
vocabulary with
inappropriate and/or
incorrect word choice
Emerging use of
basic language
structures
Noticeable
mechanical errors that
interfere with
communication.
Not developed
Restates topic
No awareness of audience or
purpose
Inappropriate response
Too brief to show development
Text incomprehensible
So short or muddled that it lacks
organization or focus
too brief to evaluate
extremely repetitive
no cohesive devices
too brief to evaluate
Riddled with errors in
sentence structure at the
sentence level
Extremely limited
vocabulary
Inadequate and
or/inaccurate use of
vocabulary
Riddled with errors
in word choice
Too brief to
evaluate
Complete lack of
basic language
structures
Mechanical errors
that seriously interfere
with communication
too brief to evaluate
Indian Hill Exempted Village School District World Languages Curriculum Framework-Spanish