analysed (themes and frequency tables). On this basis, we then developed the interview questions and,
subsequently, adapted the code system for the qualitative analysis of the interviews (cf. below).
3
The survey questionnaire included a question asking whether the respondent would be willing to be
contacted for a longer interview at some later point. Of the total 8’646 respondents to the national surveys,
27 per cent accepted to be contacted. Of these, 82 people were finally interviews some months after the
survey (8 respondents per country, except for Spain where 10 people were recruited for an interview). The
national research teams were given the instruction to purposefully select a group of respondents that
reflected the diversity of their national sample, namely in terms of gender, age, level of education and the
number of courses that the person had taken in the 12 months preceding the survey
4
. The different national
teams made slightly different choices, however the overall resulting sample of interviewees was overall
quite similar in structure to the national survey samples, especially in terms of gender (about two-thirds
women) and age (c.f. appendix). Compared to the survey sample, the qualitative sample had a higher
proportion of “active” learners (i.e. people who had attended more than one adult learning course over the
12 months preceding the survey) and a somewhat lower proportion of respondents with low professional
qualifications (see below for details).
The final composition of the group of interviewees was not completely under the control of the research
teams, as many of the respondents to the survey who had stated their readiness to be interviewed finally
did not make themselves available after all (some did not respond at all to the e-mail inviting them for an
interview, whereas others declined the invitation). In some countries (Germany for example), finding
enough interviewees was a real challenge. In other countries (Switzerland for example) finding a sufficient
number of respondents was not a problem, but certain categories of potential respondents were particularly
hard to mobilise
5
. Where a purposive sampling strategy was not entirely successful, the national teams
pragmatically resorted to a strategy of opportunistic sampling
6
The interviews were done in the months following the survey, either face-to-face or over the phone, and
lasted between 20 and 45 minutes. All interviews were audio-taped.
The topic guide for the thematic interviews was developed through a collaborative process under the
responsibility of the work package leader: the latter developed a first version of the interview guide, then
discussed it with selected partners first, before submitting a draft version to all national teams for feedback
(via google groups). On the basis of the feedback from all partners, the work package leader then finalised
the definitive topic guide, which each national team translated back to their national language(s). In parallel
with this consultative process, the leader of the qualitative work package also pre-tested a version of the
topic guide (two pilot interviews in Switzerland), which led to some minor adjustments of the guide.
3
The open survey questions, their purpose, and construction as well as the results of this part of the study are treated
in depth in the context of other parts of reports on the BeLL study.
4
Our overall sampling strategy could be described as a purposive sampling (Luborsky & Rubinstein 1995; see also
Elam et al. 2003).
5
In Switzerland for example, young people did not react to our mails.
6
Opportunistic in the sense of taking the opportunities that arise (e.g. interviewing the respondents willing to respond)
(see also Ritchie & Lewis & Elam 2003 and Luborsky & Rubinstein 1995).
Benefits of Lifelong Learning (BeLL)
Agreement n. 2011 - 4075 / 001 – 001
Project number – 519319-LLP-1-2011-1-DE-KA1-KA1SCR
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author,
and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. 7