301Deschamps et al. Perspectives on Medical Education DOI: 10.5334/pme.1198
BACKGROUND AND THE NEED FOR
INNOVATION
If building a house is a metaphor for instructional design
of education, most methods would advise aspiring
homeowners to acquire land, plan carefully with an
architect, select materials and craftsmen, and start
building a new house from scratch regardless of their
current living situation. In reality, families often find
themselves renovating their home while still living on site
due to budget constraints. The latter scenario of gradual
co-design may very well be a metaphor for the flexible
(re)design of courses as part of a postgraduate medical
training, during the flow of training programs in dynamic
professional fields.
This paper reports a flexible instructional (re)design
method for theoretical courses in post graduate medical
training, which we applied within the medical sub-specialty
of child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) in the Netherlands.
Recent changes in postgraduate medical training,
including CAP [1], demand more personalized and flexible
training to cultivate adaptable professionals [2, 3]. Evolving
evidence on brain development and on the importance
of mental health resilience and vulnerability for disorders
across the life span needs to be integrated into (child and
adolescent) psychiatry training. Societal workforce shifts
require accommodating part-time schedules of trainees.
Additionally, CAP trainees are encouraged to tailor their
learning, fostering a lifelong learning attitude, while
postgraduate training converges with continuous medical
education, offering, at least in the Netherlands, adjusted
tracks for general psychiatrists entering CAP later in their
careers [4]. Together, these changes in the field and context
of CAP pose challenges to clinical educators to re-design
training in CAP, including theoretical courses.
As clinician educators in CAP hold clinical responsibilities
in an already overwhelmed mental health care system,
they have little time and resources for teaching and
re-design of their theoretical courses. Most traditional
instructional design (ID) models include five or six steps
of design activities that overlap with the overarching
acronym ADDIE [5], referring to: analyze, design, develop,
implement and evaluate. A common example can be
found in Kern et al.’s [6] model for ID including: 1. Problem
identification and general needs assessment; 2. Targeted
needs assessment; 3. Goals and Objectives; 4. Educational
Strategies; 5. Implementation; 6. Evaluation and Feedback.
Such an approach provides a structured process for
developing comprehensive curricula in medical education,
focusing on achieving specific learning objectives through
systematic planning and implementation. However, these
redesign methods do not always fit clinician educator’s
practice. Other ID models are more flexible, iterative,
based on co-design with stakeholders and increasingly
embedding technology. Such is Salmon et al’s [7, 8] Carpe
Diem instructional design model, which emphasizes active
learning, technology integration, flexibility, collaboration,
and continuous feedback. Carpe Diem emphasizes seizing
the moment and allows a straightforward and efficient
approach for re-design that can be weaved into ongoing
training programs.
GOAL OF INNOVATION
The dual goal of the innovation was to align the content
and form of theoretical courses with the changing needs in
the field of CAP and workplace within the limits of feasibility
in the Netherlands.
PHASES TAKEN FOR DEVELOPMENT AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF INNOVATION
THE STAKEHOLDERS PANEL
According to the Carpe Diem method, a small panel
of stakeholders, representing the four regions of the
Netherlands where CAP theoretical training was offered
(n = 10), was brought together, consisting of training program
directors/teachers, trainees, an administrative support
assistant and an educational specialist. Throughout the re-
design process, the panel communicated every phase with
the national assembly of CAP training program directors to
assure co-construction with a larger stakeholder’s group.
CARPE DIEM DESIGN METHOD
This contribution shows a flexible instructional design
procedure based on the Carpe Diem method [7] that applies
principles of flexibility, technology and co-design [9].
Typically, in one rather concise session a common ground
of vision (step 1) and learning goals (step 2) are agreed
upon by all stakeholders and prototypes are designed that
can readily be integrated into daily practice (step 3). The
last three steps refine the prototypes in brief iterative cycles
with evaluation (step 4), adaptation (step 5) and further
implementation (step 6) merging daily practice with re-
design. The current project applied these steps in 4 phases
as depicted in Figure 1.
FIRST PHASE: AGREEMENT ON LEARNING
OBJECTIVES BASED ON A COMMON VISION
A request for information was sent out to CAP training
institutes in the Netherlands requesting their current CAP
learning objectives and training practices. Responses