SHOW AND TELL
ABSTRACT
Background: Developing theoretical courses for post-graduate medical training that are
aligned to current workplace-based learning practices and adaptive to change in the field
is challenging, especially in (sub) specialties where time for re-design is limited and needs
to be performed while education continues.
Approach: An instructional design method was applied based on flexible co-design to
improve post-graduate theoretical courses in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) in the
Netherlands. In four phases over a period of three years, courses were re-designed at a
national level.
Evaluation: Once common vision and learning goals were agreed upon and the prototype
was developed (phases 1 and 2), the first courses could be tested in daily practice (phase
3). Phase 4 refined these courses in brief iterative cycles and allowed for designing
additional courses building on and adding to previous experiences in brief iterative cycles.
The resulting national theoretical courses re-allocated resources previously spent on a
local level using easily accessible online tools. This allowed trainees to align content with
their clinical rotations, personal preferences and training schedules.
Reflection: The development of theoretical courses for post-graduate medical training
in smaller medical (sub-)specialties with limited resources may profit from a flexible
instructional design method. We consider the potential merit of such a method to other
medical specialties and other (inter-)national efforts to develop theoretical teaching
courses. A longer-term implementation evaluation is needed to show to what extent the
investment made in the re-design proves to be future-proof and enables rapid adaptation
to changes in the field.
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR:
Peter K. H. Deschamps
Child and Adolescent
Psychiatrist, Training Program
Director Psychiatry at Karakter,
Academic Centre for Child
and Adolescent Psychiatry
and Educational Researcher
Associated with the Radboud
Health Academy, Nijmegen,
The Netherlands
p.deschamps@karakter.com
TO CITE THIS ARTICLE:
Deschamps PKH, Beugels GMJ,
Dudink J, Frenkel J, Hennus
MP, Hofstra MB, Rutten AX,
van der Schaaf M. Living on
Site While Renovating; Flexible
Instructional Design of Post-
Graduate Medical Training.
Perspectives on Medical
Education. 2024; 13(1): 300–306.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/
pme.1198
PETER K. H. DESCHAMPS
GEKE M. J. BEUGELS
J. DUDINK
JOOST FRENKEL
MARIJE P. HENNUS
MARIJKE B. HOFSTRA
ALEXA X. RUTTEN
MARIEKE VAN DER SCHAAF
*Author affiliations can be found in the back matter of this article
Living on Site While
Renovating; Flexible
Instructional Design of
Post-Graduate Medical
Training
301Deschamps et al. Perspectives on Medical Education DOI: 10.5334/pme.1198
BACKGROUND AND THE NEED FOR
INNOVATION
If building a house is a metaphor for instructional design
of education, most methods would advise aspiring
homeowners to acquire land, plan carefully with an
architect, select materials and craftsmen, and start
building a new house from scratch regardless of their
current living situation. In reality, families often find
themselves renovating their home while still living on site
due to budget constraints. The latter scenario of gradual
co-design may very well be a metaphor for the flexible
(re)design of courses as part of a postgraduate medical
training, during the flow of training programs in dynamic
professional fields.
This paper reports a flexible instructional (re)design
method for theoretical courses in post graduate medical
training, which we applied within the medical sub-specialty
of child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) in the Netherlands.
Recent changes in postgraduate medical training,
including CAP [1], demand more personalized and flexible
training to cultivate adaptable professionals [2, 3]. Evolving
evidence on brain development and on the importance
of mental health resilience and vulnerability for disorders
across the life span needs to be integrated into (child and
adolescent) psychiatry training. Societal workforce shifts
require accommodating part-time schedules of trainees.
Additionally, CAP trainees are encouraged to tailor their
learning, fostering a lifelong learning attitude, while
postgraduate training converges with continuous medical
education, offering, at least in the Netherlands, adjusted
tracks for general psychiatrists entering CAP later in their
careers [4]. Together, these changes in the field and context
of CAP pose challenges to clinical educators to re-design
training in CAP, including theoretical courses.
As clinician educators in CAP hold clinical responsibilities
in an already overwhelmed mental health care system,
they have little time and resources for teaching and
re-design of their theoretical courses. Most traditional
instructional design (ID) models include five or six steps
of design activities that overlap with the overarching
acronym ADDIE [5], referring to: analyze, design, develop,
implement and evaluate. A common example can be
found in Kern et al.’s [6] model for ID including: 1. Problem
identification and general needs assessment; 2. Targeted
needs assessment; 3. Goals and Objectives; 4. Educational
Strategies; 5. Implementation; 6. Evaluation and Feedback.
Such an approach provides a structured process for
developing comprehensive curricula in medical education,
focusing on achieving specific learning objectives through
systematic planning and implementation. However, these
redesign methods do not always fit clinician educator’s
practice. Other ID models are more flexible, iterative,
based on co-design with stakeholders and increasingly
embedding technology. Such is Salmon et al’s [7, 8] Carpe
Diem instructional design model, which emphasizes active
learning, technology integration, flexibility, collaboration,
and continuous feedback. Carpe Diem emphasizes seizing
the moment and allows a straightforward and efficient
approach for re-design that can be weaved into ongoing
training programs.
GOAL OF INNOVATION
The dual goal of the innovation was to align the content
and form of theoretical courses with the changing needs in
the field of CAP and workplace within the limits of feasibility
in the Netherlands.
PHASES TAKEN FOR DEVELOPMENT AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF INNOVATION
THE STAKEHOLDERS PANEL
According to the Carpe Diem method, a small panel
of stakeholders, representing the four regions of the
Netherlands where CAP theoretical training was offered
(n = 10), was brought together, consisting of training program
directors/teachers, trainees, an administrative support
assistant and an educational specialist. Throughout the re-
design process, the panel communicated every phase with
the national assembly of CAP training program directors to
assure co-construction with a larger stakeholder’s group.
CARPE DIEM DESIGN METHOD
This contribution shows a flexible instructional design
procedure based on the Carpe Diem method [7] that applies
principles of flexibility, technology and co-design [9].
Typically, in one rather concise session a common ground
of vision (step 1) and learning goals (step 2) are agreed
upon by all stakeholders and prototypes are designed that
can readily be integrated into daily practice (step 3). The
last three steps refine the prototypes in brief iterative cycles
with evaluation (step 4), adaptation (step 5) and further
implementation (step 6) merging daily practice with re-
design. The current project applied these steps in 4 phases
as depicted in Figure 1.
FIRST PHASE: AGREEMENT ON LEARNING
OBJECTIVES BASED ON A COMMON VISION
A request for information was sent out to CAP training
institutes in the Netherlands requesting their current CAP
learning objectives and training practices. Responses
302Deschamps et al. Perspectives on Medical Education DOI: 10.5334/pme.1198
were combined in an inventory of learning objectives by
a CAP trainee and training program director. The recently
updated European Curriculum Framework [10, 11] was
used as an additional source to add objectives to the
inventory. During a first meeting, the stakeholders panel
formulated a common vision for future CAP training around
the central question: What does a child and adolescent
psychiatrist need during training to best prepare them to
deliver optimal care for children and their families in the
future? With this common vision in mind, items from the
inventory of learning objectives were retained, removed,
refined, complemented, and ordered using a storyboard.
At the end of this session, which lasted approximately six
hours, a learning goals inventory was ready to send out
to all training program directors in the Netherlands for
comments and broader agreement.
SECOND PHASE: DEVELOPING A PROTOTYPE OF
COURSES FOR CAP TRAINING
An inventory of teaching methods preferences was
made, combining written evaluation forms filled in by
trainees and teachers after regional theoretical courses
in the prior 2 years with in-depth interviews with 10
CAP trainees (representatives of all four regions). These
forms and interviews enquired about the most inspiring
and least helpful experiences. During a meeting with the
stakeholders panel, based on these teaching methods
preferences and the common vision, several guiding
principles were defined for the prototypes of course
modules (phase 2a). Combined with the learning goals
from step 1, a modular program of theoretical courses
was proposed (phase 2b). At the end of this session, which
lasted approximately four hours, the results were sent out
to all training program directors in the Netherlands for
comments and agreement.
THIRD PHASE: PILOTS OF COURSES
A system with online media walls was introduced as a
tool to help organize the development of teaching courses
and facilitate student and teacher engagement [12].
These allowed multiple people to work on a project and
to share teaching materials easily for redesign as well as
for daily teaching practice. Pilots were conducted with
three teaching courses, constructed at a national level
by a core group including a coordinator, around seven
trainers/teachers and one or two trainees. Feedback
collected each time a course was provided in a region was
used to re-design the next iteration. Ethical approval was
Figure 1 The redesign process: once common vision and learning goals are agreed upon and the prototype is developed (phases 1 and 2),
the first courses can be tested in daily practice (phase 3). Phase 4 refines these courses in brief iterative cycles and allows for designing
additional courses building on and adding to previous experiences in brief iterative cycles.
303Deschamps et al. Perspectives on Medical Education DOI: 10.5334/pme.1198
not applicable as the evaluations were collected in light
of standard practice quality assurance of courses in CAP
training in the Netherlands.
FOURTH PHASE: EVALUATION, REDESIGN, AND
FURTHER IMPLEMENTATION
Feedback from the first three courses was used to start up
new core groups for consecutive courses. This led to full
coverage of learning goals in a total of 16 courses. When
a course was offered in a region, evaluation was used for
further redesign at a national level. This facilitated the
implementation and the start of a full cycle across regions
with national coordination.
OUTCOMES OF THE INNOVATION
FIRST PHASE: AGREEMENT ON LEARNING
OBJECTIVES BASED ON A COMMON VISION
The vision included two central notions: a developmental
mindset in the assessment and treatment of mental health
problems in children; and a systems approach, including
circular effects of the environment on child mental health,
societal and cultural effects. A list of learning objectives was
build based on this vision. The summary is listed in Table 1.
SECOND PHASE: DEVELOPING A PROTOTYPE OF
COURSES FOR CAP TRAINING
The vision was translated into guiding principles that
could be used for theoretical course development (see
Table 1, phase 2a). Next, a decision was made to develop a
program of courses covering the list of learning objectives
(see Table 1 for titles and content, phase 2b) at a national
level and to organize them at a regional level with access
for all. Overall teaching time of these 16 modules was
about 30% less compared to previous theoretical courses
to allow time for more personal projects towards the end
of training.
THIRD PHASE: PILOTS OF COURSES
A core group led by a course-coordinator set out to develop
a course prototype. They started with a preliminary
online wall based on the learning goals from phase 1 and
teaching methods guided by principles from phase 2. It
contained sections with previously used materials, learning
objectives, a preliminary program for the new module and
literature, assignments, presentations, video lectures, and
podcasts.
This first version was provided to a regional group of
trainees within their regular training course program. Most
core group members participated actively in the teaching,
PHASE 1: AGREEMENT ON LEARNING OBJECTIVES BASED ON A COMMON VISION
Category Example of learning goal
General etiology Knowledge on development of vulnerability and resilience in children
General assessment Knowledge on stages of typical and abnormal child development.
General treatment Specific CAP treatment skills, including creating working alliance with children and parents/care givers.
Specific conditions Knowledge and skills to assess and treat specific child psychiatric conditions.
Financial, legal, and societal
aspects
Knowledge of specific CAP related aspects of financial, legal and organization of social and educational
system.
Attitudes Attitudes related to vulnerability of children and parents, safeguarding and stigma.
Phase 2a: Developing a prototype of courses for CAP training: guiding principles
Workplace learning the content of cursory education is in line with practice and workplace learning as much as possible
In-depth learning the curriculum allows for gradually more specialization within CAP with more abstract and overarching
themes
Group learning balance between exchange and cross-pollination between trainees within and between different
training groups and regions with an eye for emotional safety and group formation
Faculty development involvement of teachers and experts in the development of modules at a national level to assure
sufficient level of expertise; increase the exchange of teaching methods and content between teachers
Embrace regional and local diversity define national chalk lines so that every psychiatrist registering as CAP has the same basis; leave
enough room for autonomy of regions and teachers (balance around 80/20)
Active and blended learning trainees prepare themselves to use principles of problem-based learning before following the modules;
modules contain as many active learning methods as possible; they can be followed on site as well as
online
(Contd.)
304Deschamps et al. Perspectives on Medical Education DOI: 10.5334/pme.1198
even when it was provided in another region, making use of
blended methods (e.g., pre-recorded videos or live sessions
with online teachers). The input from these trainers was
used for evaluation purposes. Experiences from trainees
(around n = 10 each time a course was provided) and
trainers about the strengths and weaknesses of the course
were collected at the end of the course by the course-
coordinator. The online walls were open source for trainees
and teachers allowing a consecutive number of pilots with
direct feedback from all stakeholders and simultaneous
use for teaching.
FOURTH PHASE: EVALUATION, REDESIGN, AND
FURTHER IMPLEMENTATION
Every three months, national CAP trainers convened to
update and engage additional teaching staff, aligning
with their interests to motivate participation and time
reallocation. When a course was provided in one of the
regions, feedback was collected via the online media wall,
facilitating iterative cycles and alignment with common
training goals.
Considering the actual start of a full cycle at a national
level in the Netherlands, the day of the week teaching was
provided needed to be aligned. Although this may seem
mundane, it required substantial changes in local hospitals
and training centers. In line with what has been described in
the Carpe Diem methodology, alignment of common goals
and learning objectives helped reallocate and re-organize
regional resources in favor of cooperation at a national level.
The online media-walls for all modules were continuously
and simultaneously available for all teachers and trainees
at a national level throughout the process. Thus, courses
were accessible for online participants and experts could
participate as guest-speakers across regions. Teacher
and trainee online feedback on the media-wall helped
to improve courses in the short term and throughout the
next iterative cycles. An exception to blended learning
was made for the 6 day-long national modules that were
organized at a central location for all trainees to allow for
group formation and networking.
All in all, this cyclical national program integrated
knowledge from national experts in the field of CAP into
theoretical courses, offered personalized training schedules
and allowed general psychiatrists to sub-specialize in
CAP aligned with their continuous medical educational
learning needs.
CRITICAL REFLECTION
The four phases of the flexible instructional design method
took place in a flexible manner ‘while living on site’, together
PHASE 2B: DEVELOPING A PROTOTYPE OF COURSES FOR CAP TRAINING: LAY-OUT OF MODULES
Module characteristics Module title example and covered DSM-classification(s)
Specific conditions
10 modules
16 hours (4 half days) each
Blended learning.
Organized at regional level.
Online participation of trainees from
other regions allows alignment
with workplace learning, flexible
personal schedules.
Online participation of experts from
other regions.
Controlling behavior and focusing attention (Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorders)
A healthy mind in a healthy body (Sleeping disorders, eating disorders, neurological conditions)
Too much of a good thing (Addiction and substance abuse disorders)
General skills
6 modules
8 hours (1 day) each
In person learning.
Organized at national level.
Live participation allows for group
building and network activities for
future CAP workforce.
Interaction with national experts
serves professional development.
Roles of CAP in specialist mental health care and advocacy
Laws, regulations, and social aspects of CAP
Genetics of CAP conditions and phenotypical traits
Neurobiology and new treatments
Cooperation in networks with other professionals
Lifelong learning and development and teaching as a CAP
Table 1 Summary of results from phase 1 Agreement on learning objectives based on a common vision and phase 2 Developing a prototype
of courses for CAP training.
305Deschamps et al. Perspectives on Medical Education DOI: 10.5334/pme.1198
with a wide stakeholder’s group, supported by technology,
and within the reality of CAP as a smaller medical sub-
specialty with limited resources. Once common vision and
learning goals were aligned with changes in the field of
CAP and the prototype was developed (phases 1 and 2),
the first courses could be tested in daily practice (phase
3). Phase 4 refined these courses in brief iterative cycles
and allowed for designing additional courses building on
and adding to previous experiences in brief iterative cycles.
Although other methods of educational re-design – with
some adjustment – could also provide flexible re-design,
the lessons learned with the application of the Carpe Diem
method are worth reflecting on to provide insight to others
hoping to adopt a similar process.
1. Starting with a common vision and learning objectives
in line with new insights in the field of a medical
specialty within a broad stakeholder’s group creates
common trust that allows testing prototypes in brief
iterative cycles.
2. Working with online open-source media-walls helps
to support a balanced blended learning approach and
resolves logistical challenges to fit theoretical modules
with personal training and education schedules.
3. Re-designing courses at a national level requires an
initial investment from clinician-educators but when
weaved into daily practice readily saves them time.
4. Setting up a flexible re-design method pays back in the
short term and holds promise to easily adapt courses
to future changes in the field.
5. Specifically for CAP, the flexible growth mindset and
collaborative approach of the Carpe Diem method
resonates well with developmental and systems
notions that are key.
To assess and evaluate the value of our process for other
post-graduate training settings, a commentary perspective
was collected from international CAP educational
specialists and from pediatric post-graduate scholars from
the Netherlands. After implementation, the project was
presented to an international group of 24 educational
experts in CAP. One of the pilot courses was translated
into English using an automatic online translation tool
and presented. The international experts were positive
about the open-source method as it avoids scattering of
materials in folders and e-mails and it is simultaneous
availability for teachers and trainees. The methods were
judged as valuable and with slight adaptions useful in
other (inter-) national settings. Appreciation was expressed
for the interactive and collaborative way of development.
It was expected that trainees would gain from a better fit
with challenging personal schedules and teachers from
workload reduction and inspiration. Points of concern
regarding implementation of the method in their home
countries included safe-guarding intellectual property
rights and reimbursement for module coordinators,
trainees’ privacy, and IT back-ups. Respecting cultural
differences, countries would prefer to copy the module and
modify it for their own country or region.
Three post-graduate experts in pediatrics as a related
medical post-graduate training program expected that
pediatric subspecialties (e.g., pediatric intensive care,
neonatology, neonatal neurology, …) are coping with
similar challenges. Aspects of the presented redesign
deemed relevant included a central and attractive digital
access point, accommodation of highly individualized
learning tracks, and agreement on and adherence to a
national curriculum as a basis for joint theoretical course
development. As challenges, they noted finding a balance
between transferable curriculum items while recognizing
the importance of local context in teaching courses.
CONCLUSIONS
The development of high-quality teaching modules
is feasible, even for (sub-) specialties with relatively
small numbers of trainees and trainers. In other words,
it is possible to rebuild the house while living on site.
Using a flexible iterative re-design model, facilitated by
technology offers additional advantages to the specialty
at a national and international level without an increased
need for additional resources and time. A longer-term
implementation evaluation is needed to show to what
extent the investment made in the re-design proves to be
future-proof and helps adjust to future changes in the field.
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
AUTHOR AFFILIATIONS
Peter K. H. Deschamps orcid.org/0000-0001-5127-2354
Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, Training Program Director
Psychiatry at Karakter, Academic Centre for Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry and Educational Researcher Associated with the
Radboud Health Academy, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Geke M. J. Beugels
Mental Health Professionals Education Manager at Karakter,
Academic Centre for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Ede, the
Netherlands
J. Dudink orcid.org/0000-0003-0446-3646
Neonatologist and Associate Professor Teaching at the
306Deschamps et al. Perspectives on Medical Education DOI: 10.5334/pme.1198
TO CITE THIS ARTICLE:
Deschamps PKH, Beugels GMJ, Dudink J, Frenkel J, Hennus MP, Hofstra MB, Rutten AX, van der Schaaf M. Living on Site While Renovating;
Flexible Instructional Design of Post-Graduate Medical Training. Perspectives on Medical Education. Perspectives on Medical Education.
2024; 13(1): 300–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1198
Submitted: 17 October 2023 Accepted: 11 April 2024 Published: 13 May 2024
COPYRIGHT:
© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source
are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Perspectives on Medical Education is a peer-reviewed open access journal published by Ubiquity Press.
Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht,
Utrecht, the Netherlands
Joost Frenkel orcid.org/0000-0002-0200-5425
Professor of Pediatrics at the Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital,
University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
Marije P. Hennus orcid.org/0000-0003-1508-0456
Pediatric Intensivist and Associate Professor Teaching at the
Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht,
Utrecht, the Netherlands
Marijke B. Hofstra
Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist and Training Program Director
in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at Sophia Children’s Hospital,
Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Alexa X. Rutten orcid.org/0000-0003-0874-5755
Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist at GGzE, Centre for Child and
Adolescent Psychiatry, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Marieke van der Schaaf orcid.org/0000-0001-6555-5320
Professor in and Director of Utrecht Center for Research and
Development of Health Professions Education, University Medical
Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
REFERENCES
1. Deschamps P, Hebebrand J, Jacobs B, Robertson P,
Anagnostopoulos DC, Banaschewski T, et al. Training for
child and adolescent psychiatry in the twenty-first century.
European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2020; 29: 3–9. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01467-6
2. Lajoie SP, Gube M. Adaptive expertise in medical education:
Accelerating learning trajectories by fostering self-regulated
learning. Med Teach. 2018; 40: 809–12. DOI: https://doi.org/1
0.1080/0142159X.2018.1485886
3. Pelgrim E, Hissink E, Bus L, Schaaf M van der,
Nieuwenhuis L, Tartwijk J van, et al. Professionals’
adaptive expertise and adaptive performance in
educational and workplace settings: an overview of
reviews. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2022; 27: 1245–63. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10190-y
4. NvVP. De Psychiater: Medisch expert. Sociaal maatschappelijk
betrokken. Professioneel. Landelijk Opleidingsplan voor de
geneeskundige vervolgopleiding Psychiatrie. 2022. www.
nvvp.net/stream/landelijk-opleidingsplan-de-psychiater.pdf.
2020.
5. Molenda M. In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Perform
Improv. 2003; 42: 34–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/
pfi.4930420508
6. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-step
Approach: Kern, David.
7. Salmon G, Wright P. Transforming Future Teaching through
‘Carpe Diem’ Learning Design. Educ Sci. 2014; 4: 52–63. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci4010052
8. Salmon. E-tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning.
9. Usher J, MacNeill S, Creanor L. Evolutions of Carpe Diem
for learning design. Compass J Learn Teach. 2018; 11. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21100/compass.v11i1.718
10. Deschamps P, Schumann T. A new European Curriculum
Framework for training and education CAP. Eur Child Adoles
Psy. 2022; 31: 1485–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-
022-02017-3
11. UEMS-CAP, Thorsten S, Deschamps P. UEMS-CAP Curriulum
Framework for guidance in CAP training, version 2021.
2022. http://www.uemscap.eu/news/17/193/UEMS-CAP-
Curriculum-Framework-revision.
12. Fuchs B. The Writing is on the Wall: Using Padlet for Whole-
Class Engagement. Library Faculty and Staff Publications.
2014. Available from: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/libraries_
facpub/240.