1) Removes the minor consent requirement in FC §6924 that in order to be able to
consent, the minor must be either the alleged victim of incest or child abuse, or
would present a danger of serious physical or mental harm to self or others without
the mental health treatment or residential shelter services. (FC §6924(b))
2) Removes the requirement that the parent or guardian must be included in the mental
health treatment of a minor unless, in the opinion of the professional person treating
the minor, involvement would be inappropriate. Instead, requires the parent or
guardian must be included in the mental health treatment of a minor unless the
professional person treating the minor, after consulting with the minor, determines
that involvement would be inappropriate. (FC §6924(d))
Comment:
1) Author’s Intent. The sponsor notes that roughly half of children in California are on
Medi-Cal, and states the following in their fact sheet for the bill:
“Existing law in both the Health and Safety Code (HSC § 124260) and the Family
Code (FC § 6924) establishes that young people 12 and older may consent to
outpatient mental health treatment or counseling in certain circumstances without
a parent or guardian’s consent. However, language in the Family Code creates a
higher standard for young people on Medi-Cal by only allowing the young person
to consent if they are in serious danger of physical or mental harm or are the
alleged victims of incest or child abuse. In practice, the standard in the Family
Code functions as the equivalent of the “5150” legal standard that results in a
person immediately being taken into custody by police or designated mental
health professionals for involuntary evaluation and inpatient treatment, or to be
reported to child protective services. Therefore, outpatient counseling is no
longer a choice for a young person who must wait until they’re in severe distress
under this exceptionally high bar.
This fundamentally inequitable policy is ultimately at odds with the state’s
commitment to racial, ethnic, and health equity as demonstrated through ongoing
efforts of the CYBHI and CalAIM, which are state efforts to advance the goal of
greater early intervention to address the mental health needs of
youth. Requiring young people from low-income families to delay sensitive
treatment until they are in serious distress places low-income youth at
unnecessary risk of not seeking care, increasing the likelihood of suicide, self-
harm, or substance overdose.”
2) Background. The state’s two statutes regulating minor consent to mental health
treatment, FC §6924 and HSC §124260, are similar but not identical. As noted by
the sponsor in their fact sheet for the bill, FC §6924 sets the standard for consent to
mental health treatment higher than it is set in HSC §124260. FC §6924 is the
statute that must be used if a minor is covered under Medi-Cal, leading to
unequitable higher consent requirements for Medi-Cal recipients.