Page
52
Myanmar Climate Change Strategy (2018-2030)
Myanmar Climate Change Strategy (2018-2030)
10 Key Findings of Township Level Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments by 2050
In 2016 and 2017 three detailed vulnerability assessments were conducted in townships of the
Delta, Dry Zone and Mountain regions, respectively Labutta (Ayeyawaddy Region); Pakokku
(Magway Division) and Hakha (Chin State). Though largely different between them, the following
key highlights are interesting case-studies that describe the current and projected impact of
climate change on Townships, and call for urgent action at sub-national level (
Horton
et al.,
2017).
1. Climate change in the last decades has already had an impact on productive sectors,
especially agriculture, and increased the risks of disasters, affecting societies and accelerating
migration patterns in Labutta, Pakokku and Hakha.
2. Township administrations will need to plan for projected changes that include a significant
increase in both mean temperature and more hot days, shortening of the rainy season,
likelihood of intensified rain during the wet season. These factors may result in heightened
intensity of tropical storms and cyclones, and increased likelihood of floods. Sea is expected to
raise up to 41cm by 2050 in Labutta, thus increasing salinization effects and risks of inundation.
3. Social and economic conditions in general unveil an insufficiently diverse economy, very
climate-sensitive. Agriculture em
ploys many people yet it is highly exposed to loss of
productivity due to climate change. Migrations trends are observed, fuelled by reduced
productivity. Because of lack of vocational trainings and technical skills, people migrating may
struggle to secure adequate employment abroad or in larger Myanmar cities.
4. Eco-system services largely benefit communities. However, trends of degradation from over-
exploitation and the combined effects of changes in climate result in the progressive loss of
these services, and increased risks of hazards. In Labutta, the degradation of mangroves exposes
people to storm-surges, erosion because of sea-level rise. Deforestation effects coupled with
more intense rains now and in the future in Hakha, for instance, include a very high risk of
landslides.
5. Infrastructure and connectivity are not sufficiently resilient to strong storms, heavy rains,
cyclones and floods, and spatial planning is not climate-risk adequate. As a result more people
will be at risk and assets could be lost.
6. The spatial structure, services and functions of the townships studied will be deeply altered by
changes in climate. This will impact local development.
7. In this context women are, and further will be, disproportionately affected by climate change
as they already suffer from lower wages and lack of opportunities.
8. In a business as usual scenario, assuming no or little adaptation, by 2050 the townships
studied will seriously struggle to provide for their inhabitants and protect them from increased
risks of disasters. This is particularly the case of Labutta.
9. Townships must strive to achieve a scenario in which resilience is built and development is
enabled before 2050. This may be possible by achieving the following outcomes: 1) Healthy eco-
systems that continue to provide for people; 2) A diversified economy with smart agriculture and
new opportunities; 3) A resilient infrastructure that protect people, and enable development.
10. Townships will need to plan ahead for this to happen, and obtain the support of District,
Regional, National and International actors to achieve the resilience scenario.
The case-studies demonstrate that action is required, urgently, at sub-national level.