Application
News
www.shimadzu.com/an/
Shimadzu Corporation
© Shimadzu Corporation, 2023
For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
This publication may contain references to products that are not available in your country. Please contact us to check the availability of these
products in your country.
The content of this publication shall not be reproduced, altered or sold for any commercial purpose without the written approval of Shimadzu.
See http://www.shimadzu.com/about/trademarks/index.html
for details.
Third party trademarks and trade names may be used in this publication to refer to either the entities or their products/services, whether or not
they are used with trademark symbol “TM” or “”.
Shimadzu disclaims any proprietary interest in trademarks and trade names other than its own.
The information contained herein is provided to you "as is" without warranty of any kind including without limitation warranties as to its
accuracy or completeness. Shimadzu does not assume any responsibility or liability for any damage, whether direct or indirect, relating to the
use of this publication. This publication is based upon the information available to Shimadzu on or before the date of publication, and subject
to change without notice.
First Edition: Mar. 202301-00202-EN
Ti profile
Measurement c
onditions
Samples A-C and uncoated sample were measured using the
newly installed primary filter (#5). For comparison, we also
performed measurements using a conventional filter (#2), which
is also effective for analyzing trace amounts of Ti. Overlapped
profiles are shown in Fig. 3 (a) and (b). It is evident that the
signal to noise ratio of trace Ti is significantly higher on filter (#5)
compared to filter (#2).
Sample A Sample B
Sample C Uncoated sample
(a) New filter (#5) (b) Conventional Filter (#2)
Fig. 3 Ti Kα Profile Overlapping
Detection Lower Limit
Table 2 shows the results of the coated sample measured 10
times using both the new filter (#5) and the conventional filter
(#2). The titanium dioxide (TiO
2
) coating amount was
determined using the film FP method. From the standard
deviations obtained, the detection limits for each filter are
0.0045 μg/cm
2
for the newly installed filter (#5) and 0.0132
μg/cm
2
for the conventional filter (#2). These results indicate
that the newly installed filter (#5) is effective for measuring trace
amounts of Ti.
Table 2 Repeatability of the uncoated sample
n
New filter
(#5)
Conventional Filter
(#2)
1 0.032 0.030
2 0.031 0.033
3 0.033 0.028
4 0.033 0.024
5 0.030 0.025
6 0.033 0.035
7 0.035 0.027
8 0.032 0.031
9 0.033 0.021
10 0.031 0.031
Mean 0.032 0.029
Standard deviation (σ) 0.0015 0.0044
Lower detection limit (3σ) 0.0045 0.0132
[μg/cm
2
]
Quantitative analysis results
Quantitative analysis results of TiO
2
coating on samples A-C are
shown in Table 3. The uncoated sample also contained trace
amounts of Ti and therefore blank correction was performed to
subtract the contribution from the uncoated sample. The results
are shown in Table 3.
Sample name Adhesion amount of TiO
2
Sample A 0.121
Sample B 0.033
Sample C 0.005
Table 3 Quantitative Analysis Results
[μg/cm
2
]
Conclusion
Titanium dioxide photocatalytic coatings applied to PP sheets
were evaluated by EDX for TiO
2
adhesion before and after
wiping. From the results, it is clear that most of the coating
material was removed by wiping.
Primary filters are effective for trace element analysis. The use of
a new filter on the EDX-7200 allowed sensitive analysis of trace
Ti before and after wiping.
Equipment : EDX-7200
Element :
22
Ti
Analysis group : Quantitative
Analytical
method
: Thin film FP method
Detector : SDD
X-ray tube ball : Rh target
Tube voltage : 30 [kV]
Tube current : Auto [μA]
Collimator : 10 [mmφ]
Primary filter : #5 (#2)
Atmosphere : Air
Integration time : 300 sec
Deadtime : Up to 30 (%)
Table 4 Quantitative Analysis Results