AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Financial Statements with
Schedule of Passenger Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures
Schedule of Customer Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures
June 30, 2023
(With Independent Auditor’s Report Thereon)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Table of Contents
Page
Independent Auditor’s Report 1
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) 4
Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Position 26
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position 28
Statement of Cash Flows 29
Notes to Financial Statements 31
Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance
and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance
with Government Auditing Standards 99
Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance for Passenger Facility Charge Program and
Report on Internal Control Over Compliance Required by the Passenger Facility Charge
Audit Guide for Public Agencies 101
Schedule of Passenger Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures 104
Notes to Schedule of Passenger Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures 105
Schedule of Findings and Responses 106
Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance for Customer Facility Charge Program and
Report on Internal Control Over Compliance Required by the Customer Facility Charge
Audit Guide for Public Agencies 107
Schedule of Customer Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures 110
Notes to Schedule of Customer Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures 111
Schedule of Findings and Responses 112
Crowe LLP
Independent Member Crowe
Global
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
The Honorable Mayor and Board of Supervisors
City and County of San Francisco
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of the Airport Commission, City and County of San Francisco,
San Francisco International Airport, an enterprise fund of the City and County of San Francisco, California,
(the “Airport”), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2023 and the related notes to the financial statements,
as listed in the table of contents.
In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Airport as of June 30, 2023, and the changes in financial position and
its cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAS) and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing
Standards (Government Auditing Standards), issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our
responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditors Responsibilities for the Audit
of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the Airport, and to
meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our
audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for our audit opinion.
Emphasis of Matters
As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements present only the Airport and do not purport to, and do not,
present fairly the financial position of the City and County of San Francisco, California, as of June 30, 2023,
and the changes in its financial position, or, where applicable, its cash flows for the year then ended in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our opinion is
not modified with respect to this matter.
Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the
design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair
presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
1
Auditors Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are
free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors report that includes
our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore
is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards
will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement
resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery,
intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered
material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the
judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards, we:
Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures
include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Airports internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant
accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the
financial statements.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the
planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters
that we identified during the audit.
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the managements
discussion and analysis be presented to supplement the financial statements. Such information, although
not a part of the financial statements, is required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board who
considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the financial statements in an appropriate
operational, economic or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required
supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States
of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information
and comparing the information for consistency with responses to our inquiries, the financial statements,
and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the financial statements. We do not express an opinion
or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with
sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements that collectively
comprise the Airports financial statements. The accompanying schedule of passenger facility charge
revenues and expenditures and the schedule of customer facility charge revenues and expenditures, are
presented for the purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements. Such
information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying
accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements. The information has been subjected
to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures,
including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other
records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other
additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America. In our opinion, the schedule of passenger facility charge revenues and expenditures and the
schedule of customer facility charge revenues and expenditures are fairly stated in all material respects in
relation to the financial statements as a whole. The information marked unauditedhas not been subjected
to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we do not
express an opinion or provide any assurance on it.
2
Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated December 22,
2023 on our consideration of the Airports internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its
compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters.
The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting
and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Airports internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit
performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the Airports internal control
over financial reporting and compliance.
Crowe LLP
Costa Mesa, California
December 22, 2023
3
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
The management of the Airport Commission (Commission), City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco
International Airport (the Airport or SFO), an enterprise department of City and County of San Francisco (the
City), presents the following narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the Airport for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2023.
The Airport’s financial statements comprise the following components: (1) Financial Statements and (2) Notes
to Financial Statements. The Airport’s financial statements include:
The Statement of Net Position presents information on the Airport’s assets, deferred outflows of resources,
liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources as of the year end, with the difference between the amounts as net
position. Increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position
of the Airport is improving or weakening.
While the statement of net position provides information about the nature and amount of resources and
obligations at the year end, the Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position presents the
results of the Airport’s operations over the course of the fiscal year and information as to how the net position
changed during the fiscal year. The statement can be used as an indicator of the extent to which the Airport has
successfully recovered its costs through user fees and other charges. All changes in net position are reported
during the period in which the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of the
related cash flows.
The Statement of Cash Flows presents changes in cash and cash equivalents resulting from operating,
noncapital financing, capital financing, and investing activities. The statement summarizes the annual flow of
cash receipts and cash payments, without consideration of the timing of the event giving rise to the obligation or
revenue and exclude noncash accounting measures of depreciation or amortization of assets.
The Notes to Financial Statements provide information that is not displayed on the face of the financial
statements but is essential to a full understanding of the financial statements.
Highlights of Airline Operations at the Airport
Fiscal year 2022-23 passenger traffic at SFO concluded with approximately 47.1 million passengers, an
increase of 34.9% compared to the prior fiscal year (FY). Domestic enplaned passengers increased by 20.2%,
and international enplaned passengers increased by 101.0%. The year-over-year recovery was predominately
due to increased travel demand. Total cargo and U.S. mail tonnage decreased by 16.7%.
Published scheduled departing seats for SFO, Oakland (OAK) and Mineta San Jose International (SJC) were
26.1%, 17.4%, and 22.9% higher, respectively, for fiscal year 2022-23 compared to prior fiscal year. Total
scheduled departing seats for the Bay Area were 23.9% higher than the prior fiscal year.
4 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
Passenger and Other Traffic Activity
The number of flight operations (takeoffs and landings) increased by 12.7% fiscal year over year. Aircraft
revenue landed weight, which affects revenue generated by landing fees, increased by 22.1% in comparison to
the prior fiscal year. Total airport passengers, which are comprised of enplaned, deplaned and in transit
passengers (defined as passengers who fly into and out of SFO on the same aircraft), were close to 47.1
million, which was 34.9% above last fiscal year. Overall enplaned passengers increased by 34.6% over the
prior fiscal year to 23.4 million. Domestic enplanements increased by 20.2% to 17.2 million, and international
enplanements increased by 101.0% to 6.2 million passengers. Total cargo and U.S. mail tonnage decreased by
16.7%.
The following table
1
presents a comparative summary of passenger and other traffic at the Airport for fiscal
years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022:
FY 2023 FY 2022
Flight operations (takeoffs and landings) 369,974 328,183
Landed weight (in 000 lbs.) 32,350,429 26,496,685
Total Airport passengers 47,052,180 34,890,102
Enplaned passengers 23,419,568 17,396,249
Domestic enplaned passengers 17,177,004 14,290,034
International enplaned passengers 6,242,564 3,106,215
Cargo and U.S. mail tonnage (in metric tons) 454,121 545,335
Passenger Traffic
Passenger enplanements in fiscal year 2022-23 increased by 34.6% from 17.4 million to 23.4 million. Domestic
passenger enplanements increased by 20.2%, and international enplanements increased by 101.0%. Overall
enplanements increased by 6.0 million passengers, comprised of 2.9 million in domestic and 3.1 million in
international enplanements. Passenger traffic continues to close the gap to pre-pandemic levels, and has
recovered 81.8%, with domestic and international recoveries of 80.6% and 85.3% respectively, compared to
fiscal year 2018-19 (pre-pandemic).
Except for Asia where COVID-19 restrictions were in place for a longer period of time, international sector
passenger traffic recovery was robust following the lifting and relaxation of COVID-19 restrictions worldwide,
with recovery of over 90.0% for all international regions. For fiscal year 2022-23, enplanements to Asia
increased by 199.6%, Europe increased by 84.0%, Latin America increased by 21.7%, Canada increased by
114.2%, Middle East increased by 44.4%, and Australia/Oceania increased by 272.4%, compared to fiscal year
2021-22.
1
Sources: Airport’s Analysis of Airline Traffic, Fiscal Years 2023 and 2022.
5 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
On a quarterly basis, enplanements increased by 55.7%, 35.5%, 39.0%, and 16.6%, relative to the same
quarter in fiscal year 2021-22.
Overall airline seat capacity increased by 26.1% during fiscal year 2022-23 as compared to fiscal year 2021-22,
with a domestic increase of 16.9% and an international increase of 59.7%. The overall load factor (the
percentage of seats filled on flights) increased by 5.3 percentage points to 84.4%. The domestic load factor
increased by 2.3 percentage points to 85.1%, while the international load factor increased by 17.0 percentage
points to 82.8%.
Flight Operations
During fiscal year 2022-23, the number of aircraft operations (takeoffs and landings) increased by 41,791 flights
(12.7%) as compared to fiscal year 2021-22. Scheduled passenger aircraft arrivals and departures increased
by 42,858 flights (13.5%). Civil and military traffic decreased by 1,067 flights (9.0%). The total number of
scheduled airline passenger and cargo landings increased by 14.3%, with an increase in revenue landed weight
of 22.1%. Domestic passenger landings increased by 10.6%, while domestic landed weight increased by
14.4%. International passenger landings increased by 38.7%, while international landed weight increased by
45.1%. Average passenger aircraft size increased from approximately 153 to 167 seats per flight. Domestic
scheduled seats per flight increased from 141 to 149, while international scheduled seats per flight increased
from 227 to 243. The overall balance between mainline passenger aircraft (wide body and narrow body) and
commuter aircraft (regional jets and turbo props) shifted 6.6% towards mainline aircraft, which increased to
78.1% for domestic and international operations combined. Mainline landings increased by 26,213 and
commuter landings decreased by 4,853.
Cargo Tonnage
Fiscal year 2022-23 cargo and mail tonnage decreased by 91,214 metric tons (16.7%). Domestic cargo and
mail decreased by 36,513 metric tons (16.6%), while international cargo and mail decreased by 54,701 metric
tons (16.7%). Tonnage shares of cargo-only carriers decreased by 2.6% to 20.2%. Tonnage on cargo-only
carriers decreased by 26.1%, while tonnage on passenger carriers decreased by 14.0%, due to overall decline
in shipments.
Financial Highlights
Liabilities and deferred inflows of resources exceeded assets and deferred outflows of resources at the
close of the fiscal year by $822.9 million.
Total revenue bonds payable by the Airport decreased by $81.4 million.
Operating revenues were $1.1 billion.
Operating expenses were $902.8 million.
Nonoperating expenses, net of revenues from nonoperating sources were $197.4 million (including
revenues of $92.3 million from Passenger Facility Charges (PFC), $11.4 million from Customer Facility
Charges (CFC), and $23.8 million from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)). Total Federal awards
received were $24.6 million. The Airport has $0.08 million remaining in Coronavirus Response and Relief
6 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA) and $3.9 million in ARPA funds remaining available for use in
fiscal year 2023-24.
Capital contributions consist of grants from the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Airport
Improvement Program (AIP) of $28.7 million.
Transfers to the City and County of San Francisco for the annual service payments were $48.7 million.
Net position decreased by $162.7 million mainly due to the cumulative effect of accounting change from the
implementation of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 91 - Conduit
Debt Obligations and the recognition of capital assets for the SFO Fuel System.
7 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
Overview of the Airport’s Financial Statements
Net Position Summary
A condensed summary of the Airport’s net position for the fiscal years 2023 and 2022 is shown below (in
thousands):
FY 2023
FY 2022
Assets:
Unrestricted current assets $ 1,223,147 1,104,277
Restricted current assets 741,971 591,895
Unrestricted noncurrent assets 831,198 241,871
Restricted noncurrent assets 1,113,454 930,708
Net pension asset 153,872
Capital assets, net 6,934,498 6,977,073
Total assets 10,844,268 9,999,696
Deferred outflows of resources:
Unamortized loss on refunding of debt 30,534 36,158
Deferred outflows on derivative instruments 10,192
Deferred outflows related to OPEB 38,931 35,683
Deferred outflows related to pensions 105,957 82,086
Total deferred outflows of resources 175,422 164,119
Liabilities:
Current liabilities 648,266 527,812
Current liabilities payable from restricted assets 202,883 215,088
Noncurrent liabilities 9,440,484 9,102,113
Net OPEB liability 257,767 251,367
Net pension liability 162,200
Derivat ive ins t rument s 10, 192
Total liabilities 10,711,600 10,106,572
Deferred inflows of resources:
Deferred inflows related to OPEB 50,948 50,638
Deferred inflows related to pensions 37,692 380,803
Deferred inflows related to leases 1,042,367 286,045
Total deferred inflows of resources 1,131,007 717,486
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets (1,603,694) (1,327,327)
Restricted for debt service 75,798 61,899
Restricted for capital projects 653,258 492,914
Restricted for other purposes 4,660 1,978
Unrestricted 47,061 110,293
Total net position $ (822,917) (660,243)
8 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
Total net position serves as an indicator of the Airport’s financial position. The Airport’s liabilities and deferred
inflows of resources exceeded assets and deferred outflows of resources by $822.9 million and $660.2 million
as of June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively, representing a decrease of $162.7 million (24.6%).
Unrestricted current assets consist primarily of cash and investments available to meet the Airport’s current
obligations. Unrestricted current assets increased by $118.9 million (10.8%), primarily due to higher operating
revenues as the Airport begins its recovery from the pandemic. As of June 30, 2023, the Airport has set aside
$156.7 million in a separate fund for purposes of its Other Postemployment Benefit (OPEB) obligations and
such amount is included in unrestricted cash and investments held in the City Treasury in the statement of net
position. The disposition of this fund is under management’s discretion and has not been placed in a trust fund.
Restricted current assets consist of cash and investments held in the City Treasury and outside the City
Treasury. Cash and investments held in the City Treasury consist primarily of PFCs collected, CFCs collected,
debt service funds held by the bond trustee, grants receivable, and PFCs receivable. Restricted current assets
increased by $150.1 million (25.4%). The increase was primarily due to the new CFCs collected, higher
investment earnings, increase of grants receivable and PFCs receivable.
Unrestricted noncurrent assets increased by $589.3 million (243.7%) due to the increase in lease receivable.
Restricted noncurrent assets increased by $182.7 million (19.6%), primarily due to the increase in interest
receivable and less capital project spending which increased the cash and investments held in the City
Treasury.
The net pension asset decreased by $153.9 million (100.0%). The decrease was primarily due to investment
losses that resulted in a net pension liability compared to a net pension asset in fiscal year 2021-22. See
additional information in note 12a.
Capital assets consist of land, buildings, structures, improvements, equipment, and intangible assets. Capital
assets, net of depreciation and amortization, decreased by $42.6 million (0.6%), primarily due to the
depreciation of assets.
Unamortized loss on refunding of debt decreased by $5.6 million (15.6%). The decrease was primarily due to
the amortization of the bond refunding gain/loss.
Deferred outflows on derivative instruments decreased by $10.2 million (100.0%), representing deferred
outflows of resources offsetting interest rate swap liabilities in accordance with GASB Statement No. 53 –
Accounting and Financial Reporting for Derivative Instruments (GASB Statement No. 53) and GASB Statement
No. 72 – Fair Value Measurement and Application (GASB Statement No. 72). The last remaining interest rate
swaps were terminated in fiscal year 2022-23.
Deferred outflows related to OPEB increased by $3.2 million (9.1%) primarily due to investment losses offset by
experience gains. See additional information in note 12b.
Deferred outflows related to pensions increased by $23.9 million (29.1%) primarily due to changes in the
discount rate, the Airport’s proportionate share, and actuarial assumptions. See additional information in note
12a.
9 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
Current liabilities payable from unrestricted assets increased by $120.5 million (22.8%), primarily due to an
increase in unearned aviation revenue and current maturities of long-term debt.
Current liabilities payable from restricted assets decreased by $12.2 million (5.7%), primarily due to the
reclassification from a short-term liability to a long-term liability of commercial paper notes that were refinanced
with the proceeds of the Series 2023C/D bond issued on November 15, 2023. See note 17.
Noncurrent liabilities before net OPEB liability, net pension liability, and derivative instruments increased by
$338.4 million (3.7%), primarily due to the reclassification of commercial paper notes as described in the
preceding paragraph. See note 17.
Net OPEB liability increased by $6.4 million (2.5%) primarily due to investment losses offset by the actual
experience gain. See additional information in note 12b.
Net pension liability (NPL) increased by $162.2 million (100.0%) primarily due to investment losses resulting in a
net pension liability in fiscal year 2022-23. See additional information in note 12a.
Derivative instruments liabilities decreased by $10.2 million (100.0%) due to the termination of interest rate
swaps in fiscal year 2022-23.
Deferred inflows related to OPEB increased by $0.3 million (0.6%) primarily due to investment losses and the
amortization of deferrals. See additional information in note 12b.
Deferred inflows related to pensions decreased by $343.1 million (90.1%) primarily due to investment losses
which caused a reduction in deferred inflow of earnings. See additional information in note 12a.
Deferred inflows related to leases increased by $756.3 million (264.4%) due to the addition of new leases and
the adoption of GASB Statement No. 91 in fiscal year 2022-23.
The Airport’s net investment in capital assets decreased by $276.4 million (20.8%), primarily due to the residual
effect of the Airport depreciating its capital assets faster than repaying its bonded debt.
Net position restricted for debt service increased by $13.9 million (22.5%), primarily due to more cash and
investments held outside City Treasury for debt service.
Net position restricted for capital projects increased by $160.3 million (32.5%), primarily due to higher PFC
generated from the growth in air traffic and new CFC revenue.
Net position restricted for other purposes increased by $2.7 million (135.6%), primarily due to the Hotel's
operating revenues exceeding the Hotel's operating expenses due to higher occupancy levels.
Unrestricted net position decreased by $63.2 million (57.3%), primarily due to the cumulative effect of
accounting change from the implementation of GASB Statement No. 91 and the recognition of capital assets for
the SFO Fuel system. See note 10.
10 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
Highlights of Changes in Net Position
The following table shows a condensed summary of changes in net position for fiscal years 2023 and 2022 (in
thousands):
FY 2023 FY 2022
Operating revenues
O
perating expenses
$ 1,064,104
902,750
821,253
809,830
Operating income 161,354 11,423
Non-Operating Expenses, net 197,389 179,955
Loss before capital
contributions and trans
f
ers
36,035
(
168,532
)
Capital contributions
Trans
f
ers to
C
ity and
C
ounty o
f S
an Francisco
28,679
48,701
40,998
37,906
Changes in net position (deficit) (56,057) (165,440)
Total net position (deficit) – beginning of year (660,243) (494,803)
Cumulative effect of accounting change (106,617)
Total net position (deficit) – end of year $ (822,917) (660,243)
Operating Revenues
The Airport derives its operating revenues from rates, fees, and charges assessed to the airlines; the
operation of public and employee parking facilities; rents and fees assessed to concessionaires and
ground transportation operators; and fees assessed for telecommunication access services. Landing fees
and demised premise rental rates assessed to airlines are set periodically based on formulas and
procedures described in the Lease and Use Agreement (Agreement).
2
In fiscal year 2009-10, the Airport and airlines reached agreement on a new, ten-year 2011
Lease and Use Agreement that became effective on July 1, 2011, that originally expired June
30, 2021, and that was mutually extended to June 30, 2023. The 2011 Lease and Use
Agreement and the 2-Year Extension of said agreement are referred to generally as the “Lease
and Use Agreement,” and the airlines that are parties to those agreements are referred to as
“Signatory Airlines”. See note 2(i) and note 17 for a brief description of the new, ten-year 2023
Lease and Use Agreement.
11 (Continued)
2
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
A brief summary of the underlying rate-setting methodology under this Agreement is presented below:
The Agreement establishes a residual rate-setting methodology for the calculation of the landing fees and
demised premise rental rates using certain cost centers. Using this methodology, Rates and Charges (that
includes landing fees, demised premise rental rates, and other fees) are established each fiscal year to
produce projected revenues from the airlines equal to the difference between the Airport’s estimated nonairline
revenues and the Airport’s budgeted total costs, including operating expenses, debt service expenses and the
Annual Service Payment (ASP) to the City’s General Fund for that year. The Agreement provides for matching
revenues each fiscal year to the Airport’s expenditures by adjusting payments from the airlines. Differences
between actual revenues and expenditures and amounts estimated in the calculation of airline fees and
charges for that fiscal year result in adjustments of demised premise rental rates and landing fees in
subsequent years. Such differences are recorded on the statement of net position in the financial statements of
the Airport in the fiscal year to which such differences pertain. Net overcharges are recorded as liabilities and
net undercharges are recorded as assets.
The overcharge balance of $417.1 million as of June 30, 2022, increased to $461.7 million as of June 30, 2023,
and was recorded as unearned aviation revenue in the statement of net position. See note 2i.
12 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
The following table shows the air carriers that served the Airport in fiscal year 2022-23:
Domestic passenger air carriers Foreign flag carriers Cargo-only carriers
Alaska Airlines Aer Lingus 21 Air, LLC
American Airlines Aeromexico ABX Air
Breeze Airways Air Canada Air Transport International
Delta Air Lines Air France Atlas Air
Frontier Airlines Air India Limited Federal Express
Hawaiian Airlines Air New Zealand Kalitta Air
JetBlue Airways Air Transat
Southwest Airlines All Nippon Airways
Sun Country Airlines Asiana Airlines
United Airlines British Airways
COPA Airlines, Inc.
Cathay Pacific
China Airlines
China Eastern
China Southern
Condor
EVA Airways
Emirates
Commuter air carriers
Fiji Airways
Horizon Air (Alaska Airlines) Flair Airlines
Jazz Aviation (Air Canada) French Bee
SkyWest Airlines (Alaska Airlines) Iberia
SkyWest Airlines (American Airlines) Japan Airlines
SkyWest Airlines (Delta Air Lines) KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
SkyWest Airlines (United Airlines) Korean Air Lines
Lufthansa German Airlines
Philippine Airlines
Qantas Airways
Qatar Airways
SAS Airlines
Singapore Airlines
Swiss International
TACA International Airlines, S.A.
TAP Air Portugal
Turkish Airlines
Vietnam Airline JSC
Virgin Atlantic
WestJet
ZIP AIR Tokyo Inc
13 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
The following table shows a comparison of terminal rental rates and airline landing fees for fiscal years 2022-23
and 2021-22:
FY 2023 FY 2022
Effective average terminal rental rate (per sq. ft.) $ 187.47 196.45
Signatory Airline – landing fee rate (per 1,000 lbs.) 7.73 11.40
Non-Signatory Airline – landing fee rate (per 1,000 lbs.) 9.66 14.25
General aviation and itinerant aircraft – landing fee rate (per 1,000 lbs.) 9.66 14.25
During fiscal years ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, revenues realized from the following source equaled or
exceeded 5.0% of the Airport’s total operating revenues:
FY 2023 FY 2022
United Airlines 26.2 % 28.4 %
14 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
The following shows a comparative summary of operating revenues for fiscal years 2022-23 and 2021-22
(in thousands):
FY 2023 FY 2022
Aviation
Concession
Hotel
Parking and transportation
Sales and se
$ 630,250
128,019
37,377
183,520
rvices 84,938
468,840
113,261
29,251
132,253
77,648
Total operating revenues $ 1,064,104 821,253
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
FY 2023 FY 2022
Aviation
Concession
Hotel
Parking and transportation
Sales and services
$
Operating revenues increased by 29.6%, from $821.3 million in fiscal year 2021-22 to $1.1 billion primarily due
to increased passenger traffic.
Aviation revenues increased from $468.8 million in fiscal year 2021-22 to $630.3 million primarily due to
rebounding passenger traffic.
15 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
As determined by the calculation method in the Agreement, scheduled airline landing fees per thousand
pounds decreased from $11.40 in fiscal year 2021-22 to $7.73 in fiscal year 2022-23. The airline average
annual terminal rent per square foot decreased from $196.45 in fiscal year 2021-22 to $187.47 in fiscal year
2022-23, due to a 6.2% decrease in residual terminal rental revenue requirement combined with a 1.7%
decrease in airline leased space to 1.72 million square feet.
Before the unearned aviation revenue adjustment of $44.7 million, revenues from landing fees decreased by
$51.7 million (17.3%) due to a landing fee rate decrease partly offset by landed weight increase. Terminal
rentals decreased by $8.4 million (2.6%), due to decreases in terminal rental rates combined with changes in
airline leased space. In aggregate, all other aviation revenues increased by $9.3 million (9.2%), from $101.2
million in fiscal year 2021-22 to $110.5 million in fiscal year 2022-23, with net aviation rental revenue and
activity-based fees including aircraft parking, parking employees, common use gate fees and fixed base
operations (FBO) all showing increases.
Concession revenues, consisting of rentals and fees derived from food and beverage concessions, duty free,
retail merchandise (gifts, candy, tobacco, and news), rental car concessions, and other concession revenue
increased by 13.0%, from $113.3 million in fiscal year 2021-22 to $128.0 million in fiscal year 2022-23. The
higher revenues resulted mainly from a 44.9% increase in airport food & beverage and retail sales. Food and
beverage revenues increased by $4.3 million (26.1%) due to higher passenger volumes and the average spend
rate per passenger. The passenger food and beverage spend rate increased by 8.3% from $10.40 in fiscal year
2021-22 to $11.26 in fiscal year 2022-23. Retail merchandise revenues excluding duty free revenues increased
by $4.2 million (49.8%) for the same reasons. The Airport-wide per passenger spend rate for such merchandise
increased by 6.2% from $4.02 in fiscal year 2021-22 to $4.27 in fiscal year 2022-23. As of June 2023, all Duty
Free and Luxury Stores (DFS) locations have reopened, including the newly renovated DFS Duty Free Galleria
in boarding Areas A and G, and this, combined with the recovery of international passenger volumes, resulted
in a $0.9 million (6.6%) increase in revenues from duty free merchandise sales. On- and off-Airport rental car
revenues increased by $12.3 million (28.8%) as a result of increased passenger volumes. Other concession
revenues decreased by $1.5 million (4.6%), primarily due to lower rental revenue from an on-Airport COVID
testing site. During the pandemic, the Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG) rent had been suspended due to
severe decline in enplanements. Through June 2023, MAG rent has been reinstated for approximately 63.0%
of all concession leases.
The on-Airport hotel operating revenues increased by 27.8% from $29.3 million in fiscal year 2021-22 to $37.4
million primarily due to the increase in high-end leisure travelers, individual business travelers, and the return of
group meetings.
Public parking and transportation revenues, consisting of rentals and fees derived from parking facilities and
ground transportation operations, increased by 38.8%, from $132.3 million in fiscal year 2021-22 to $183.5
million in fiscal year 2022-23. The combined net effect of a 13.2% increase in the average revenue per ticket,
from $37.48 in fiscal year 2021-22 to $42.43 in fiscal year 2022-23, and a 19.4% increase in parking
transactions resulted in a parking revenue increase of $33.6 million (35.7%). Ground transportation revenues,
including taxi trip fee revenue, increased by $17.7 million (46.5%) primarily due to increased passenger levels.
Transportation Network Company (TNC) operations at the Airport (including Uber Technologies Inc., Lyft, Inc.,
and Tickengo, Inc., d/b/a/ Wingz) increased by 50.4%. TNC Airport pick-ups/drop-offs totaled nearly 8.2 million
resulting in $45.1 million in trip fee revenue. Other modes of transportation also experienced increased activity
16 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
levels compared to fiscal year 2021-22, including hotel shuttles (up 12.1%), door to door pre-arranged vans (up
94.0%), limousines (up 35.6%), taxis (up 33.6%), scheduled buses (up 27.3%), charter buses (up 100.9%) and
off-airport parking vans (up 8.4%). The Airport continues to see a shift in passenger behavior where parking is
preferred over single or high occupancy mode transportation (such as taxis, TNCs, and buses), as compared to
relative market share of ground transportation options prior to the pandemic.
Sales and service revenues consist of revenue derived from utility services, telecommunication access fees,
badge and permit fees, rental car facility fees, and cost-based reimbursement of various services. Revenues
from sales and services increased by 9.4%, from $77.6 million in fiscal year 2021-22 to $84.9 million in fiscal
year 2022-23. Revenue from the sale of water sewage disposal increased by $1.5 million (29.3%).
Telecommunication fees were lower by $0.2 million (3.0%) due to decreased demand for telecommunication
access services. Licenses and permit fees increased by $0.4 million (19.2%) as a result of higher badging
activity by tenant employees and contractors. The transportation and facility fee (AirTrain fee charged on rental
car contracts) increased by $4.2 million (27.0%) due to a 26.6% increase in the number of rental car contracts.
Fees collected for the cost of the Rental Car Center increased by $2.3 million (14.7%) primarily due to lower
fiscal year 2021-22 fees resulting from credits provided through the Federal CRRSAA concession relief grant
and the Rental Car Center structure and surface rent annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustments.
Revenue from penalties from the enforcement of airfield safety rules and regulations decreased by $0.5 million
(22.8%) due to the lower level of activity. Miscellaneous terminal fees increased by $1.1 million (11.7%),
reflecting billings per lease and permit terms. Governmental agency rent revenue decreased by $1.4 million
(22.3%) primarily due to the expiration of the U.S. Postal Service ground lease. Miscellaneous Airport
Revenues decreased by $0.1 million (32.0%) reflecting billings per lease and permit terms. Net revenue from all
other sales and services including sale of electricity, sale of natural gas, food court infrastructure/cleaning fees,
refuse disposal, collection charges and settlements decreased by $0.7 million (4.0%).
17 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
Operating Expenses
The following table shows a comparative summary of operating expenses for fiscal years 2023 and 2022 (in
thousands):
FY 2023 FY 2022
Personnel
Depreciation and amortization
Contractual services
Hotel
Light, heat and power
S
ervices provided by other
C
it
y
departments
Repairs and maintenance
Materials and supplies
General and administrative
Environmental remediation
$ 283,669
355,475
97,718
32,161
28,771
27,247
59,081
13,384
3,883
1,361
216,842
356,649
81,424
24,969
27,554
26,949
56,189
12,560
4,567
2,127
Total operating expenses $ 902,750 809,830
Operating expenses increased from $809.8 million to $902.8 million primarily due to increases in expenses for
personnel, contractual services, hotel, light, heat and power, services provided by other City departments,
repairs and maintenance, and materials and supplies. In fiscal year 2022-23, the Airport capitalized $16.9
million of indirect costs related to construction of capital projects as overhead, compared to $14.0 million in
fiscal year 2021-22. The variances in the different categories are discussed below.
Personnel expenses increased by $66.9 million (30.8%), from $216.8 million to $283.7 million. The increase
was primarily due to an increase in pension expenses as a result of investment losses.
Depreciation and amortization decreased by $1.1 million (0.3%), from $356.6 million to $355.5 million. The
decrease was primarily due to assets becoming fully depreciated.
Contractual services increased by $16.3 million (20.0%), from $81.4 million to $97.7 million. The increase was
primarily due to increased expenses for various professional services contracts, such as parking, shuttle buses,
and technology services.
The on-Airport hotel operating expenses increased by $7.2 million (28.8%), from $25.0 million to $32.2 million.
The increase was primarily due to a rise in departmental expenses and undistributed operating expenses.
Light, heat and power expenses increased by $1.2 million (4.4%), from $27.6 million to $28.8 million. The
increase was primarily due to an increase in consumption and rates.
18 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
Expenses of services provided by other City departments increased by $0.3 million (1.1%), from $26.9 million
to $27.2 million. The increase was primarily due to higher water usage and an increase in San Francisco Public
Utilities Commission (SFPUC) water rates.
Repairs and maintenance expenses increased by $2.9 million (5.1%), from $56.2 million to $59.1 million. The
increase was primarily due to the return of pre-pandemic service levels in maintenance contracts such as from
Airport-wide Emergency, SFO Checkpoint and Screening Room Sanitary, and Superbay Hose Reel.
Materials and supplies expenses increased by $0.8 million (6.6%), from $12.6 million to $13.4 million. The
increase was a result of inflation as well as increased spending on cleaning supplies due to higher passenger
traffic that occurred during fiscal year 2022-23.
General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.7 million (15.0%), from $4.6 million to $3.9 million. The
decrease was primarily due to a decrease in estimated bad debts expense related to the Airport COVID-19
Emergency Rent Relief Program for concession tenants and judgment claims.
Environmental remediation expenses decreased by $0.7 million (36.0%), from $2.1 million to $1.4 million. The
decrease was primarily due to fewer new capital projects.
19 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
Nonoperating Revenues and Expenses
The following summary shows a comparison of nonoperating revenues and expenses in fiscal years 2023 and
2022 (in thousands):
FY 2023 FY 2022
Nonoperating revenues:
Passenger
f
acility charges
(
PF
C)
$
92,341 72,804
Customer facility charges (CFC)
Investment income
(
loss
)
11,441
42,540
(
64,113
)
Other 32,056 176,955
Total nonoperating revenues 178,378 185,646
Nonoperating expenses:
Interest expense 350,349 321,132
Write-o
ff
s and gain
(
loss
)
on disposal 70 11,672
Other 25,348 32,797
Total nonoperating expenses 375,767 365,601
Total nonoperating expenses, net (197,389) (179,955)
Capital contributions
Trans
f
ers to
C
ity and
C
ounty o
f
28,679 40,998
San Francisco (48,701) (37,906)
Total $ (217,411) (176,863)
Nonoperating revenues consist primarily of PFC, CFC, and investment income, while nonoperating expenses
consist of interest expense, and write-offs and gain (loss) on the disposal of capital assets. Write-offs include
capital improvement costs that did not meet capitalization requirements. PFCs, which became effective in
October 2001, generated $92.3 million during fiscal year 2022-23, an increase of 26.8% compared to the $72.8
million received in fiscal year 2021-22. The increase in PFC revenues was primarily due to an increase in
passenger traffic and the easing of the COVID-19 restriction. CFCs, which became effective in July 2022,
generated $11.4 million during fiscal year 2022-23.
Investment income (loss) increased by $106.6 million (166.4%), from $(64.1) million to $42.5 million primarily
due to the investment fair value adjustments. Excluding the fair value adjustments, the actual investment
income (loss) increased by $40.4 million, from $22.7 million to $63.1 million.
Other nonoperating revenues decreased by $144.9 million (81.9%), from $177.0 million to $32.1 million
primarily due to the Federal CRRSAA grant award of $5.9 million and the Federal ARPA grant award of $169.0
million. The Federal ARPA grant was fully expended in fiscal year 2021-22.
20 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
Interest expense increased by $29.2 million (9.1%), from $321.1 million to $350.3 million primarily due to an
increase in debt issued to fund capital improvement projects.
Write-offs and gain (loss) on disposal decreased by $11.6 million (99.4%), from $11.7 million to $0.1 million
primarily due to the sale of equipment.
Other nonoperating expenses decreased by $7.5 million (22.7%), from $32.8 million to $25.3 million primarily
due to a reduction in capital improvement projects costs under the capitalization threshold.
Capital contributions received from federal grants and other sources decreased by $12.3 million (30.0%), from
$41.0 million to $28.7 million. The decrease in capital contributions was primarily due to assets transferred from
SFO Fuel to the Airport in the prior year, which did not occur in fiscal year 2022-23. Capital contributions
received from federal grants and other grants increased by $11.7 million (68.8%), from $17.0 million to $28.7
million. The increase was primarily due to the increase in the Airport Improvement Program grant-funded
expenditures attributed to the rehabilitation of one of the airport runways.
The annual service payments transferred to the City increased by $10.8 million (28.5%), from $37.9 million to
$48.7 million. The increase was due to higher concession, hotel, and parking and transportation revenues
attributable to an increase in passenger traffic.
Capital Acquisitions and Construction
Under the Lease and Use Agreement, the Airport Commission is obligated to use commercially reasonable
efforts to finance all capital improvements (above certain de minimis amounts) through the issuance of Airport
revenue bonds, grants, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) funding, and Passenger Facility Charges
(PFCs). The Agreement also provides for airline review of capital projects that exceed the dollar thresholds
established within the Agreement.
The Airport maintains a Capital Improvement Plan to build new facilities, improve existing facilities, renovate
buildings, repair or replace infrastructure, preserve assets, enhance safety and security, develop systems
functionality, and perform needed maintenance.
21 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
Expenses incurred during fiscal year 2022-23 with respect to major capital projects are listed below. The figures
below do not reflect the total project budget. Most major capital projects at the Airport are implemented over
multiple fiscal years (in thousands).
Amount
Terminal 1 Redevelopment $ 131,756
Runway Improvements 43,708
Terminal 3 Renovation 27,096
International Terminal Refresh Program 19,163
Waste Water System Improvements 18,859
Net Zero Energy Program 9,843
Courtyard 3 Connector 9,746
Energy and Efficency Improvements 7,268
Miscellaneous Terminal Improvements 6,250
Capital Improvement Plan Support 4,995
AirTrain Improvements 4,335
Technology Improvement 4,286
Parking and Garage Improvements 3,930
Taxiway Improvements 3,764
Capital Equipment 3,657
Support Facility Improvements 3,341
International Terminal Improvements 3,190
Power & Lighting Improvements 2,465
Storm Drain Improvements 2,380
Noise Insulation Program 2,256
Miscellaneous Airfield Improvements 1,923
Shoreline Protection 1,840
Airport Support Miscellaneous Improvements 1,773
Utility Improvements 1,749
Wayfinding 1,233
All Other Projects 1,536
COVID (5,428)
Total
$
316,914
22 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
Due to COVID-19 pandemic and the reduction in travel demand, the Airport initially reprioritized its Capital
Improvement Plan to focus on projects that were essential to Airport operations and resiliency priorities given
the present-day recovery landscape. Passenger enplanements and deplanements at the Airport were
approximately 57.4 million in fiscal year 2018-19, before dropping to 40.5 million in fiscal year 2019-20 and 13.7
million in fiscal year 2020-21, then recovering to 34.8 million in fiscal year 2021-22 and 46.9 million in fiscal
year 2022-23. This recovery has allowed construction activity to continue on major projects such as the
Terminal 1 (T1) Redevelopment Program, the Courtyard 3 Connector project, and the International Terminal
Phase 2 project, which will make improvements to the building and expand both departures level security
checkpoints.
The T1 Redevelopment Program completed the Harvey Milk Boarding Area B, for a total of 22 operational
gates, in May 2021. Construction activity continues in the Terminal 1 North area, and this work is forecasted to
complete in fiscal year 2023-24.
Notable projects that were completed in fiscal year 2022-23 included the completion of the Noise Insulation
Program 2019-2023 Phase and the 12KV Cable Replacement and System Upgrade.
Additional information about the Airport’s capital acquisitions and construction is presented in note 5 to the
financial statements.
Debt Administration
Refunding Bonds: On March 1, 2023, the Airport issued its fixed rate Second Series Revenue Bonds,
Series 2023A (AMT) and Second Series Revenue Bonds, Series 2023B (Non-AMT/Governmental
Purpose (collectively, the “2023A/B Bonds”), in aggregate principal amount of $241.9 million to refund a
combined $261.5 million of its Series 2010A Bonds, Series 2013A Bonds, and Series 2013B Bonds, to
fund the termination payment of an interest rate swap, and to pay costs of issuance.
Cash Defeasance: On June 28, 2023, the Airport legally defeased $28.8 million of its Series 2019D
Bonds, using monies previously deposited by the Commission in the Debt Service Fund.
Subordinate Commercial Paper Notes: During fiscal year 2022-23, the Airport issued $417.3 million in
commercial paper notes to fund capital improvement projects. As of June 30, 2023, the Airport had
$503.2 million in outstanding commercial paper notes including $497.8 million that was refunded by the
Series 2023C/D bonds that were issued on November 15, 2023. The $497.8 million has been reclassed
to long-term commercial paper notes on the financial statements as of June 30, 2023. See note 17.
Interest Rate Swaps: The Airport terminated interest rate swaps in fiscal year 2022-23.
More detailed information about the Airport’s subordinate commercial paper notes, long-term debt, and
interest rate swaps is presented in notes 6 and 7 to the financial statements.
23 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
1991 Master Bond Resolution Covenant Compliance: During fiscal year 2022-23, the Airport’s operating
revenues, together with the permitted transfers from the Airport’s Contingency Account, were sufficient to
meet the rate covenant requirements under the Airport’s 1991 Master Bond Resolution. See “Debt
Service Reserve and Covenants; Contingency Account” in note 7.
Credit Ratings and Bond Insurance
Credit Ratings: During fiscal year 2022-23, Moody’s Investors Service Inc. (Moody’s) and Fitch Ratings Inc.
(Fitch) affirmed their underlying long-term credit ratings on the outstanding debt of the Airport of “A1” and “A+”,
respectively. S&P Global Ratings (S&P) raised its underlying long-term credit ratings on the outstanding debt of
the Airport to “A+”. Refer to the notes below.
Ratings on each subseries of the Airport’s commercial paper notes reflect the short-term credit ratings of the
bank whose letter of credit supports that subseries.
On January 12, 2023, Moody’s affirmed the “A1” rating with a stable outlook and Fitch affirmed the “A+” rating
with a stable outlook for the outstanding fixed rate bonds and assigned these ratings to the Series 2023A/B
Bonds, which were issued on March 1, 2023. S&P did not provide a rating for the Series 2023A/B Bonds.
On July 20, 2022, S&P raised the rating for outstanding fixed rate bonds to “A+” with a stable outlook except for
those bonds that do not carry an S&P rating. Each individual bond’s rating is accessible through the Electronic
Municipal Market Access (EMMA) website.
Bond Insurance: There were no insured Airport bonds outstanding at the end of fiscal year 2022-23.
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Airline Rates and Charges
Terminal rental rates and airline landing fees for fiscal year 2023-24 have been developed as part of the annual
budget process that started in October 2022. The Lease and Use Agreement between the Airport and the
Signatory Airlines provides the rate-setting methodology for calculating the terminal rental rates and airline
landing fees. Not less than 60 days prior to the start of the fiscal year, the Signatory Airlines are notified of the
proposed rates and fees. These fees are subject to review by, but not the approval of, the Signatory Airlines.
The terminal rental rates and airline landing fees for fiscal year 2023-24, which became effective on July 1,
2023, are as follows:
Effective average terminal rental rate (per sq. ft) $ 225.62
Signatory Airline – landing fee rate (per 1,000 lbs.) 5.98
Non-Signatory Airline – landing fee rate (per 1,000 lbs.) 7.48
General aviation – landing fee rate (per 1,000 lbs.) 7.48
24 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2023
The effecti
ve average terminal rental rate increased from $187.47 per sq. ft. in fiscal year 2022-23 to $225.62
per sq. ft. in fiscal year 2023-24. The fiscal year 2023-24 landing fee rate for Signatory Airlines decreased by
22.6%, from $7.73 per 1,000 pounds in fiscal year 2022-23 to $5.98 per 1,000 pounds in fiscal year 2023-24,
and the Non-Signatory Airline landing fee rate decreased by 22.6%, from $9.66 per 1,000 pounds in fiscal year
2022-23 to $7.48 per 1,000 pounds in fiscal year 2023-24. The fiscal year 2023-24 landing fee rate for general
aviation aircraft decreased by 22.6%, from $9.66 per 1,000 pounds in fiscal year 2022-23 to $7.48 per 1,000
pounds in fiscal year 2023-24.
Requests for Information
This report is designed to provide a general overview of the San Francisco International Airport’s finances.
Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional information should
be addressed to the Chief Financial Officer, San Francisco International Airport, P.O. Box 8097, San Francisco,
California 94128.
25
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Statement of Net Position
June 30, 2023
(In thousands)
Amount
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and investments held in City Treasury
Cash and investments outside City Treasury
Cash – Revolving Fund
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,446)
Lease receivable
Lease interest receivable
Accrued interest – City Treasury
Accrued interest – outside City Treasury
Inventories
Other current assets
Restricted assets:
$ 998,115
23,732
41
67,438
114,523
2,423
6,506
2,275
3,232
4,862
Cash and investments held in City Treasury
Cash and investments outside City Treasury
Accounts receivable
Accrued interest – City Treasury
Accrued interest – Other
Grants receivable
Passenger facility charges receivable
Other current assets
575,751
111,574
3,706
3,441
(161)
30,343
16,231
1,086
Total current assets 1,965,118
Noncurrent assets:
Lease receivable
Restricted assets:
831,198
Cash and investments held in City Treasury
Cash and investments outside City Treasury
Accrued interest – City Treasury
Capital assets, net
Land and other assets not being depreciated/amortized
Facilities, infrastructure and equipment, net of
depreciation/amortization
545,745
565,059
2,650
1,036,900
5,897,598
Total noncurrent assets 8,879,150
Total assets 10,844,268
Deferred outflows of resources:
Unamortized loss on refunding of debt
Deferred outflows related to OPEB
Deferred outflows related to pensions
30,534
38,931
105,957
Total deferred outflows of resources $ 175,422
(Continued)
26
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Statement of Net Position
June 30, 2023
(In thousands)
Amount
Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
Accrued payroll
Compensated absences
Accrued workers’ compensation
Estimated claims payable
Unearned aviation revenue
Current maturities of long-term debt
Payable from restricted assets:
Accounts payable
Accrued payroll
Accrued bond interest payable
Commercial paper notes
Current maturities of long-term debt
$ 78,870
19,383
12,326
2,710
122
461,730
73,125
117,998
748
64,062
5,450
14,625
Total current liabilities 851,149
Noncurrent liabilities:
Compensated absences, net of current portion
Accrued workers’ compensation, net of current portion
Estimated claims payable, net of current portion
Other liabilities
11,861
9,857
4,150
370
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
Commercial paper notes - long term
Net OPEB liability
Net pension liability
8,916,471
497,775
257,767
162,200
Total noncurrent liabilities 9,860,451
Total liabilities 10,711,600
Deferred inflows of resources:
Deferred inflows related to OPEB
Deferred inflows related to pensions
Deferred inflows related to leases
50,948
37,692
1,042,367
Total deferred inflows of resources 1,131,007
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets
Restricted for debt service
Restricted for capital projects
Restricted for other purposes
Unrestricted
(1,603,694)
75,798
653,258
4,660
47,061
Total net position (deficit) $ (822,917)
27
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position
Year ended June 30, 2023
(In thousands)
Amount
Operating revenues:
Aviation
Concession
Hotel
Parking and transportation
Sales and services
$ 630,250
128,019
37,377
183,520
84,938
Total operating revenues 1,064,104
Operating expenses:
Personnel
Depreciation and amortization
Contractual services
Hotel
Light, heat and power
Services provided by other City departments
Repairs and maintenance
Materials and supplies
General and administrative
Environmental remediation
283,669
355,475
97,718
32,161
28,771
27,247
59,081
13,384
3,883
1,361
Total operating expenses 902,750
Operating income 161,354
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Investment income (loss)
Interest expense
Passenger facility charges
Customer facility charges
Write-offs and loss on disposal
Other nonoperating revenues
Other nonoperating expenses
42,540
(350,349)
92,341
11,441
(70)
32,056
(25,348)
Total nonoperating revenues (expenses), net (197,389)
Loss before contributions and transfers (36,035)
Capital contributions:
Grants
Transfers to City and County of San Francisco
28,679
(48,701)
Changes in net position (deficit) (56,057)
Total net position (deficit) – beginning of year (660,243)
Cumulative effect of accounting change (106,617)
Total net position (deficit) – end of year $ (822,917)
28
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended June 30, 2023
(In thousands)
Amount
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash received from airline carriers, concessionaires, and others
Cash paid for employees’ services
Cash paid to suppliers of goods and services
$ 1,136,744
(328,397)
(280,170)
Net cash provided by operating activities 528,177
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:
Transfers to City and County of San Francisco
Other noncapital financing revenues
Other noncapital financing expenses
(48,701)
31,692
(25,348)
Net cash used in noncapital financing activities (42,357)
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Principal paid on revenue bonds and commercial paper notes
Interest paid on revenue bonds and commercial paper notes
Acquisition and construction of capital assets
Revenues from passenger facility charges
Revenues from customer facility charges
Proceeds from sale of revenue bonds
Proceeds from commercial paper notes
Lease payable
Capital contributed by federal agencies and others
(30,060)
(387,197)
(259,793)
84,458
11,398
1,064
417,250
752
8,713
Net cash used in capital and related financing activities (153,415)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sales of investments with Trustee
Purchases of investments with Trustee
Interest received on investments
628,083
(659,908)
36,369
Net cash provided by investing activities 4,544
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 336,949
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 1,810,483
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 2,147,432
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents to the statement of
net position:
Cash and cash equivalents held in City Treasury – unrestricted
Cash and cash equivalents held in City Treasury – restricted
Cash and cash equivalents outside City Treasury – unrestricted
Cash and cash equivalents outside City Treasury – restricted
Cash – Revolving Fund
$ 998,115
1,121,496
23,732
4,048
41
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 2,147,432
29 (Continued)
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended June 30, 2023
(In thousands)
Reconciliation of operating income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Operating income
Adjustments for noncash and other activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Cost of issuance paid from bond proceeds
Hotel expense
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (net of change in allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,502)
Leases
Inventories
Other current assets
Net OPEB liability and OPEB related
deferred outflows and inflows of resources
Net pension liability/asset and pension related
deferred outflows and inflows of resources
Accounts payable and other liabilities
Accrued payroll
Compensated absences
Accrued workers’ compensation
Unearned aviation revenue
Net cash provided by operating activities
Noncash transactions:
Accrued capital asset costs
Bond refunding through fiscal agent
$
$
Amount
161,354
355,475
477
55
8,026
(4,325)
92
(1,053)
3,460
(50,910)
8,127
2,245
3
474
44,677
528,177
110,362
263,976
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
30
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(1) Definition of Reporting Entity
The accompanying financial statements reflect the net position and changes in net position of the Airport
Commission (the Commission), City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International Airport (the
Airport or SFO), a commercial service airport owned and operated as an enterprise department of the City
and County of San Francisco (the City). The Airport is a major origin and destination point and one of the
nation’s principal gateways for Pacific traffic. A five-member Airport Commission is responsible for its
operation, development, and maintenance. Airport Commission members are appointed by the City’s
Mayor for terms of four years.
The Airport is an integral part of the City and is reported as a major enterprise fund in the City’s
Annual
Comprehensive Financial Report. There are no component units considered for inclusion in the Airport’s
financial reporting entity. The accompanying financial statements present only the financial operations of
the Airport and do not purport to, and do not, present the financial position of the City, or the results of its
operations and the cash flows of its other proprietary fund types.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
(a)
Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting
The Airport’s financial activities are accounted for on a flow of economic resources measurement
focus, using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP).
The Airport distinguishes operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating revenues and
expenses. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing
and delivering goods in connection with an organization’s principal ongoing operations. The principal
operating revenues of the Airport are charges to airlines, concessionaires, and parking and
transportation charges. Operating expenses of the Airport include personnel costs, administrative
expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting these definitions
are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses.
As prescribed under the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 68 –
Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions – an amendment of GASB Statement No. 27, net
pension asset/liability, deferred outflows/inflows of resources related to pensions, pension expense,
information about the fiduciary net position of the San Francisco Employees Retirement System
(SFERS) plan and additions to/deductions from the plan’s fiduciary net position have been determined
on the same basis as they are reported by the plan. For this purpose, benefit payments (including
refunds of employee contributions) are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the
benefit terms. Contributions are recognized in the period in which they are due pursuant to legal
requirements. Benefit payments (including refunds of employee contributions) are recognized when
currently due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value.
As prescribed under GASB Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment
Benefits Other than Pensions (OPEB), Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment
Benefits Other than Pensions (OPEB), net OPEB liability, deferred outflows/inflows of resources related
to OPEB, and OPEB expense are actuarially determined on a citywide basis. For purposes of
measuring the net OPEB liability and deferred outflows/inflows of resources related to OPEB, and
31
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
OPEB expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Retiree Health Care Trust Fund
(RHCTF) and additions to/deductions from the plans’ fiduciary net position have been determined on
the same basis as they are reported by the plans. For this purpose, benefit payments are recognized
when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Plan member contributions are recognized
in the period in which the contributions are due. Investments are reported at fair value.
As prescribed under GASB Statement No. 87 – Leases, a lessor is required to recognize, for each
lease, a lease receivable and a deferred inflow of resources. The lease receivable is measured at the
present value of lease payments expected to be received during the term of the lease. The deferred
inflow of resources is measured at the value of the lease receivable plus any payments received at or
before the commencement of the lease term that relates to future periods. Interest revenue is
recognized on the lease receivable and inflow of resources (revenue) is recognized from the deferred
inflows of resources in a systematic and rational manner over the term of the lease.
(b)
Effects of New Accounting Pronouncements
GASB Statement No. 91
In May 2019, the GASB issued Statement No. 91, Conduit Debt Obligations
. GASB Statement No. 91
clarifies the definition of conduit debt and establishes new recognition, measurement, and disclosure
requirements. The new standard is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2021. Prior to
that, the Airport received contributed capital assets including two tanks, pump pad and control
replacements from the SFO Fuel Company LLC. Due to the implementation of GASB Statement No.
91, the Airport reclassified the assets’ net book value of $106.6 million from revenue to the deferred
inflow of resources, and will amortize over the bond term through 2047. See note 10.
GASB Statement No. 94
In March 2020, the GASB issued Statement No. 94, Public-Private and Public-Public Partnerships and
Availability Payment Arrangements. GASB Statement No. 94 establishes standards of accounting and
financial reporting for public-private and public-public partnerships (PPPs) and availability payment
arrangements. A PPP is an arrangement in which a government contracts with an operator to provide
public services by conveying control of the right to operate or use a nonfinancial asset, such as
infrastructure or other capital asset (the underlying PPP asset), for a period of time in an exchange or
exchange-like transaction. An availability payment arrangement is an arrangement in which a
government compensates an operator for services that may include designing, constructing, financi
ng,
maintaining, or operating an underlying nonfinancial asset for a period of time in an exchange or
exchange-like transaction. The new standard requires reporting of related assets and deferred inflows
that currently are not reported and is effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2022. Application of
this statement did not have a significant impact on the Airport for the year ended June 30, 2023.
GASB Statement No. 96
In May 2020, the GASB issued Statement No. 96, Subscription-Based Information Technolog
y
Arrangements. GASB Statement No. 96 defines such arrangements as contracts that convey control of
the right to use another party’s information technology software, alone or in combination with tangible
capital assets, as specified in the contract for a period of time in an exchange or exchange-like
transaction. The standard clarifies measurement and recognition of capitalizable costs, intangible
32
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
assets, and subscription liabilities for such arrangements and also requires additional disclosures
related to such arrangements. The implementation of GASB Statement No. 96 resulted in recognition
of $2.7 million in a right-to-use asset and a corresponding subscription liability in fiscal year 2022-23.
See note 11.
GASB Statement No. 99
In April 2022, the GASB issued Statement No. 99, Omnibus 2022. GASB Statement No. 99 addresses
a variety of topics. The requirements related to extension of the use of the London Interbank Offered
Rate, accounting for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program distributions, disclosures of
nonmonetary transactions, pledges of future revenues by pledging governments, clarification of certain
provisions in Statement No. 34, and terminology updates related to Statement No. 53 and Statement
No. 63 were adopted by the City for the year ended June 30, 2022. The requirements related to leases,
public-public and public-private partnerships, and subscription-based information technology
arrangements are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2022 and did not have a significant
impact on the Airport’s financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2023. The Airport is currently
analyzing its accounting practices to determine the potential impact of the requirements related to
financial guarantees and the classification and reporting of derivative instruments within the scope of
Statement No. 53 which are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2023 and effective for the
Airport’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2024.
GASB Statement No. 100
In June 2022, the GASB issued Statement No. 100, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. GASB
Statement No. 100 defines various types of accounting changes and prescribes accounting, reporting,
and disclosure requirements for accounting changes and error corrections. The new standard is
effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2023. Application of this statement is effective for the
Airport’s year ending June 30, 2024.
GASB Statement No. 101
In June 2022, the GASB issued Statement No. 101, Compensated Absences. GASB Statement No.
101 requires that liabilities for compensated absences be recognized if the leave is attributable to
services already rendered and the leave is more likely than not to be used for time off or otherwise paid
in cash or settled through noncash means and establishes definitions, guidance, and disclosure
requirements related to compensated absences. The new standard is effective for periods beginning
after December 15, 2023. Application of this statement is effective for the Airport’s year ending June
30, 2025.
(c)
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments
The Airport maintains its cash, cash equivalents, investments, and a significant portion of its restricted
cash and investments as part of the City’s pool of cash and investments. The Airport’s portion of this
pool is displayed on the statement of net position as “Cash and investments held in City Treasury.”
Income earned or losses arising from pooled investments are allocated on a monthly basis to
appropriate funds and entities based on their average daily cash balances.
33
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
The City reports certain investments at fair value in the statement of net position and recognizes the
corresponding change in fair value of investments in the year in which the change occurred.
The Airport considers its pooled deposits held with the City Treasurer to be demand deposits and
therefore cash for financial reporting. The City considers highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Restricted cash and investments held by the
bond trustees that meet these criteria are considered to be cash and cash equivalents.
The debt service fund, the debt service reserve fund, the costs of issuance fund, the debt service
holding fund, and the variable rate demand bond fee account for the Airport’s revenue bonds are held
and invested at the Airport’s direction by an independent bond trustee.
Certain accounts relating to the Hotel Special Facility Bonds are held and invested at the Airport’s
direction by an independent bond trustee.
(d)
Capital Assets
Capital assets are stated at historical cost, or if donated, at acquisition value at the date of donation.
The capitalization threshold for real property is $100,000 and $5,000 for personal property with a useful
life greater than one year.
Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the following
estimated useful lives:
Yea rs
Buildings, structures, and improvements 5–50
Equipment 5–20
Leases and SBITA Various
Intangible assets 3–20
Maintenance, repairs, and minor replacements are charged against operations in the year performed.
Major replacements that extend the useful life of the related assets are capitalized. No depreciation is
provided on construction in progress until construction is substantially completed and the asset is
placed in service. The Airport begins depreciation on capital assets the month following the date in
which assets are placed in service. Additionally, the Airport commenced allocating indirect costs on
self-constructed assets starting fiscal year 2006-07. The indirect cost rate applied is based on a cost
allocation plan developed in accordance with the terms of 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance), as
applicable. See note 5.
(e)
Derivative Instruments
The Airport has entered into certain derivative instrument agreements, which it values at fair value, in
accordance with GASB Statement No. 53 – Accounting and Financial Reporting for Derivative
Instruments and GASB Statement No. 72 – Fair Value Measurement and Application. The Airport
applies hedge accounting for changes in the fair value of hedging derivative instruments, in accordance
with GASB Statement No. 64 – Derivative Instruments: Application of Hedge Accounting Termination
34
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Provisions, an amendment of GASB Statement No. 53. Under hedge accounting, if the derivatives are
determined to be effective hedges, the changes in the fair value of hedging derivative instruments are
reported as either deferred inflows or deferred outflows in the statement of net position, otherwise
changes in fair values are recorded within the investment revenue classification. As of June 30, 2023,
the Airport did not have any outstanding derivative instruments. The Airport will implement the
provisions of GASB Statement No. 99 in the future if it is applicable.
(f)
Bond Issuance Costs, Discounts, and Premiums
Bond issuance costs related to prepaid insurance costs are capitalized and amortized using the
effective interest method. Other bond issuance costs are expensed when incurred. Original issue bond
discount or premium are offset against the related debt and are also amortized using the effective
interest method. Deferred outflows/inflows of resources from refunding of debt are recognized as a
component of interest expense using the effective interest method over the remaining life of the old
debt or the life of the new debt, whichever is shorter.
(g)
Compensated Absences
Vested vacation, sick leave, and related benefits are accrued when incurred for all Airport employees.
(h)
Net Position
Net position consists of the following:
Net Investment in Capital Assets – consists of capital assets, including restricted capital asse
ts,
reduced by accumulated depreciation and amortization and by any outstanding debt incurred to
acquire, construct, or improve those assets (including any unamortized original issue discounts or
premiums related to the debt). Deferred outflows of resources that are attributable to the acquisition,
construction, or improvement of those assets or related debt (such as deferred losses on refunding of
debt) are also included in this component of net position.
Restricted for Debt Service and Capital Projects – consists of restricted assets and deferred outflows of
resources reduced by liabilities related to those assets and deferred outflows of resources. Restricted
assets are those assets with restrictions on their use that are externally imposed (by creditors,
grantors, contributors, or the laws or regulations of other governments).
Restricted for Other Purposes – consists of the on-Airport Hotel’s assets and liabilities (including
the
Hotel Trust accounts) except the Hotel Debt Service Fund trust account, the Hotel Revenue
Stabilization Fund trust account, the Hotel Capitalized Interest trust account, and the Hotel’s capital
lease obligations.
Unrestricted Net Position – consists of the net amount of the assets, deferred outflows of resources,
and liabilities, of the Airport that are not restricted for any project or other purposes.
A significant portion of the Airport’s net position is restricted by the 1991 Master Bond Resolution and
1997 Note Resolution (the “Master Bond Resolutions”) and the Lease and Use Agreement with the
airlines for the purpose of capital improvements and contingencies.
35
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(i)
Aviation Revenue, Unearned Revenue and Aviation Revenue Due
Aviation revenue is based on reimbursable expenditures as defined in the Lease and Use Agreement
with the airlines. Under the Lease and Use Agreement, the airlines are required to pay terminal rents
and landing fees in amounts that, when aggregated with certain other Airport revenues, will be equal to
the Airport’s expenditures for: operating expenses other than depreciation and amortization, principal
and interest on outstanding debt, annual service payments to the City’s General Fund, and certain
acquisitions of capital assets. Airline payments are also required to cover expenses treated as
“Operation and Maintenance Expenses” under the Master Bond Resolutions. Airport expenses that are
funded with sources not includable as “Revenues” under the Master Bond Resolutions are not treated
as “Operation and Maintenance Expenses” under the Master Bond Resolutions. Other capital asset
additions are funded with proceeds of revenue bonds for which the airlines are required to fund debt
service. During fiscal year 2022-23, the Airport and airlines reached an agreement on a new, ten-year
2023 Lease and Use Agreement that expires on June 30, 2033. Airlines that are not signatories to this
agreement operate under month-to-month permits. As of July 1, 2023, the signatory airlines to the
Agreement, 42 passenger airlines and 5 cargo airlines, represented over 96.9% of enplaned
passengers in fiscal year 2023-24.
Amounts billed to airlines are based on budgeted revenues and expenditures, including debt service,
pension charges and proportionate payments to such compensation and other insurances or outside
reserve funds as the Commission may establish or the Board of Supervisors may require with respect
to employees of the Commission. Noncash accrued pension obligations other than those actually paid
or budgeted to be paid during the fiscal year are excluded. Noncash accrued Other Postemployment
Benefit obligations are included. Unanticipated sources of Revenues, or unanticipated grant funding
available to apply to offset Airport expenses, can result in aviation revenue collected in advan
ce.
Aviation revenue collected in advance will be applied to reduce future billings and is recorded as a
liability in the financial statements. Aviation revenue due to be collected will be reduced by increases in
future billings and is recorded as an asset in the financial statements. Pursuant to the terms of the
Lease and Use Agreement, the Airport has a net aviation revenue collected in advance of $461.7
million as of June 30, 2023.
(j)
Concession Revenues
Concession revenues consist of rentals and fees derived from food and beverage concessions, duty
free, retail merchandise and rental car concessions. Revenues are based on terms of lease
agreements entered into between the Airport and concessionaires and are the greater of a percentage
of tenant’s gross revenues or, where applicable, MAG amount.
(k)
Hotel Revenues
Hotel revenues consist of rooms, food and beverage, garage, meeting and special event, and parking
services.
36
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(l)
Parking and Transportation Revenues
Parking and transportation revenues consist of fees derived from parking facilities and ground
transportation operations. Parking revenues are parking fees collected from all public parking facilities
at the Airport. Transportation revenues are ground transportation trip fees assessed to commercial
vehicles that service the Airport.
(m)
Sales and Services Revenues
Sales and services revenues are collected for utility, security, and miscellaneous services provided to
the tenants. Utility services are provided by the City. See note 13.
(n)
Environmental Remediation Expenses and Recoveries
The Airport incurs costs associated with environmental remediation activities, which arise during the
normal course of business. These costs are recorded as a liability when the Airport is required to
perform the remediation and if the costs can be reasonably estimated. The Airport records
environmental remediation cost recoveries as nonoperating revenues in the financial statements.
(o)
Capital Contributions
The Airport receives grants for the purpose of acquisition or construction of property and equipment.
These grants are recorded as capital contributions when earned generally upon expenditures of the
funds.
(p)
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(q)
Reclassification
Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.
(3) Cash, Cash Equivalents, and
Investments
Pooled Cash and Investments
The Airport maintains operating cash, cash equivalents, investments, and certain restricted cash and
investments as part of the City’s investment pool. The City’s investment pool is an unrated pool
pursuant to investment policy guidelines established by the City Treasurer and is treated as a cash
equivalent for financial reporting purposes as the Airport is able to withdraw amounts from the pool on
demand without notice or penalty. The objectives of the City Treasurer’s investment policy are, in order
of priority, preservation of capital, liquidity, and yield. The policy addresses soundness of financial
institutions in which the City will deposit funds, types of investment instruments as permitted by the
California Government Code and the City Treasurer policy, and the percentage of the portfolio that may
be invested in certain instruments with longer terms to maturity. The Airport’s unspent bond and
commercial paper note proceeds are also generally invested as part of the City’s investment pool.
37
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
The Airport’s cash and investments, at fair value, held in the City’s pool as of June 30, 2023 (in
thousands):
Amount
Pooled cash and investments:
Cash and investments held in City Treasury – unrestricted $ 998,115
Cash and investments held in City Treasury – restricted
current 575,751
Cash and investments held in City Treasury – restricted
noncurrent 545,745
Total cash and investments held in City Treasury $ 2,119,611
The following table shows the percentage distribution of the City’s pooled investments by maturity:
Investment maturities (in months)
Under 1 1 less than 6 6 less than 12 12 60
21.5% 18.0% 14.5% 46.0%
(b)
Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agent
The restricted assets for revenue bond reserves, debt service and costs of issuance are held by an
independent bond trustee for the Airport’s senior lien bonds (the Senior Trustee) and a separate
independent bond trustee for the Airport’s subordinate lien bonds (the Subordinate Trustee, and
collectively with the Senior Trustee, the Trustees). In addition, restricted assets relating to the Hotel
Special Facility Bonds are held by an independent bond trustee for the Hotel Special Facility Bonds.
The unrestricted assets in the debt service holding fund and the variable rate demand bond fee
account are not pledged to the payment of the Airport Commission’s bonds, but are held by the Senior
Trustee for the convenience of the Airport Commission in the administration and investment of monies
delivered to the Senior Trustee prior to the time the Airport Commission is required to make deposits
into the Debt Service Fund or pay the fees of the remarketing agents for the Airport Commission’s
variable rate bonds, respectively.
Custodial Credit Risk - Deposits
Custodial credit risk for deposits is the risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financ
ial
institution, the Airport will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral
securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The California Government Code and the
City’s investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to
cu
stodial credit risk for deposits.
38
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
The California Government Code requires California banks and savings and loan associations to
secure the Airport’s deposits not covered by FDIC insurance by pledging government and/or local
agency securities as collateral. The fair value of such pledged securities must equal at least 110% and
be of the type authorized in California Government Code, Section 53651 (a) through (i). The collateral
must be held at the pledging bank’s trust department or another bank, acting as the pledging bank’s
agent, in the Airport’s name. At June 30, 2023, all banks with funds deposited by the Treasurer secured
deposits with sufficient collateral or FDIC insurance.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an
investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair
value to changes in interest rates. Information about the sensitivity to the fair values of the Airport’s
investments to interest rate fluctuations is provided by the following tables, which shows the distribution
of the Airport’s investments by maturity.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to pay the holder of the
investment. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating
organization. The S&P Global Ratings (S&P) rating for each of the investment types are provided by
the following tables.
Custodial Credit Risk – Investments
Custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty to a
transaction, the Airport will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities that
are in the possession of another party. The California Government Code and the City’s investment
policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk
for investments; however, it is the practice of the City Treasurer that all investments are insured,
registered or held by the Treasurer’s custodial agent in the Airport’s name. The Airport also has
investments with trustees related to the issuance of bonds that are uninsured, unregistered and held by
the counterparty’s trust departments but not in the Airport’s name. These amounts are included in the
investments outside City Treasury and are provided by the following tables.
39
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Concentration of Credit Risk
The City’s investment policy contains no limitations on the amount that can be invested in any one
issuer beyond that stipulated by the California Government Code and/or its investment policy. U.S.
Treasury and agency securities explicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government are not subject to single
issuer limitation.
The Airport holds investments with trustees that represent 5.0% or more of the Airport’s investments
outside City Treasury as of June 30, 2023:
Federal National Mortgage Association 6.59%
40
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
As of June 30, 2023, the Senior Trustee held investments for the benefit of the Airport with maturities as
follows (in thousands):
Credit ratings
June 30, 2023
(S&P/Moody’s
June 30, 2023
Investments / Fitch) Maturities Fair value
Federal Home Loan Bank Notes AA+/Aaa/NR September 4, 2025 $ 1,029
Federal Home Loan Bank Notes AA+/Aaa/NR September 4, 2025 187
Federal Home Loan Bank Notes AA+/Aaa/NR December 8, 2023 7,215
Federal Home Loan Bank Notes AA+/Aaa/NR December 8, 2023 1,140
Federal National Mortgage
Association Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 17, 2025 9,973
Federal National Mortgage
Association Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 25, 2025 7,064
Federal National Mortgage
Association Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 7, 2025 8,771
Federal National Mortgage
Association Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 7, 2025 8,471
Federal National Mortgage
Association Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 7, 2025 7,869
Federal National Mortgage
Association Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 17, 2025 1,033
Federal National Mortgage
Association Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 25, 2025 741
Federal National Mortgage
Association Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 7, 2025 902
Federal National Mortgage
Association Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 7, 2025 882
Federal National Mortgage
Association Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 7, 2025 474
US Treasury Bill A-1+/P-1/F1+ October 26, 2023 39,335
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ March 31, 2028 13,122
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ March 31, 2026 11,747
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2026 10,803
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2026 9,003
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ September 30, 2026 5,367
41
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Credit ratings
June 30, 2023
(S&P/Moody’s
June 30, 2023
Investments / Fitch) Maturities Fair value
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ September 30, 2026 6,708
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 15, 2024 15,704
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 30, 2026 9,637
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 30, 2027 5,769
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 30, 2027 9,615
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 30, 2027 7,692
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 31, 2027 5,450
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 31, 2027 9,465
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ October 31, 2027 5,469
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ October 31, 2027 14,916
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ December 31, 2027 10,645
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2028 18,454
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ March 31, 2028 700
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ March 31, 2026 1,355
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2026 1,170
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2026 900
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ September 30, 2026 447
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ September 30, 2026 894
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 15, 2024 1,505
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 30, 2026 901
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 30, 2026 1,081
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 30, 2027 769
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 30, 2027 769
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 31, 2027 956
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 31, 2027 526
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ October 31, 2027 646
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ October 31, 2027 1,492
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ December 31, 2027 1,577
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2028 1,894
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ March 31, 2024 215
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2024 215
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ March 31, 2024 54
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2024 54
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ February 15, 2028 13,152
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ May 15, 2028 7,700
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 30, 2024 6,752
42
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Credit ratings
June 30, 2023
(S&P/Moody’s
June 30, 2023
Investments / Fitch) Maturities Fair value
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ December 31, 2023 3,448
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ December 31, 2023 8,078
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2024 12,053
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ May 15, 2027 14,895
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ July 31, 2024 12,838
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 31, 2024 5,025
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 31, 2024 11,633
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ October 31, 2024 6,835
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ October 31, 2024 9,513
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2027 4,528
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2027 6,339
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2027 11,319
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ February 28, 2025 12,371
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2025 11,182
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2025 8,371
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2025 8,896
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 30, 2025 8,674
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ July 31, 2025 16,377
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 30, 2025 4,061
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 30, 2025 3,610
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2026 5,386
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2026 6,284
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2026 14,093
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2026 3,591
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ March 15, 2024 15,531
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ October 31, 2023 6,943
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ October 31, 2023 40,668
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ February 15, 2028 752
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ May 15, 2028 806
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 30, 2024 482
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 30, 2024
482
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ May 15, 2027 1,210
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 31, 2024 95
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ October 31, 2024 709
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ October 31, 2024 381
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2027 906
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2027 815
43
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Credit ratings
June 30, 2023
(S&P/Moody’s
June 30, 2023
Investments / Fitch) Maturities Fair value
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2027 1,268
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ February 28, 2025 1,246
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2025 1,044
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 30, 2025 2,111
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 30, 2025 913
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ July 31, 2025 1,183
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 30, 2025 542
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2026 1,167
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2026 1,526
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2026 269
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 31, 2023 219
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ September 30, 2023 219
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ October 31, 2023 218
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 30, 2023 218
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ December 31, 2023 217
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2024 216
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ February 29, 2024 215
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AAA July 31, 2023 220
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 31, 2023 55
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ September 30, 2023 55
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ October 31, 2023 55
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 30, 2023 54
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ December 31, 2023 54
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 31, 2024 54
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ February 29, 2024 54
US Treasury Notes AA+/Aaa/AAA July 31, 2023 55
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corp Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ July 21, 2025 5,989
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corp Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ July 21, 2025 3,649
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corp Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ September 23, 2025 7,144
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corp Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ December 4, 2023
1,272
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corp Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ July 21, 2025 306
44
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Credit ratings
June 30, 2023
(S&P/Moody’s June 30, 2023
Investments / Fitch) Maturities Fair value
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corp Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ July 21, 2025 182
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corp Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ September 23, 2025 730
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corp Notes AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 1, 2025 4,936
Federal Farm Credit Banks
Funding Corp AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 8, 2024 7,839
Federal Farm Credit Banks
Funding Corp AA+/Aaa/AA+ June 23, 2026 5,082
International Bank for Reconstruction &
Development AAA/Aaa/AAA March 19, 2024 441
International Bank for Reconstruction &
Development AAA/Aaa/AAA January 15, 2025 521
International Bank for Reconstruction &
Development AAA/Aaa/AAA January 15, 2025 379
Inter-American Development Bank AAA/Aaa/AAA September 23, 2024 1,041
State of Oregon Department
of Tranportation AAA/Aa1/AA+ November 15, 2023 222
State of Wisconsin AA+/Aa1/NR May 1, 2024 155
State of Wisconsin NR/Aa2/AA May 1, 2024 228
State of Minnesota AAA/Aaa/AAA August 1, 2025 187
State of Mississippi AA/Aa2/AA November 1, 2023 128
City of San Jose AA+/Aa1/AAA September 1, 2023 487
Long Beach Community College AA/Aa2/NR August 1, 2023 224
Ventura County Community College AA+/Aa1/NR August 1, 2023 533
Los Angeles Community College AA+/Aaa/NR August 1, 2025 200
Los Angeles Unified School District NR/Aa3/AAA July 1, 2025 446
Freddie Mac Multifamily
Structured Pass AA+/Aaa/AAA August 1, 2023 293
Freddie Mac Multifamily
Structured Pass AA+/Aaa/AA+ April 1, 2027 513
Freddie Mac Multifamily
Structured Pass AA+/Aaa/AA+ December 1, 2024 227
45
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Credit ratings
June 30, 2023
(S&P/Moody’s June 30, 2023
Investments / Fitch) Maturities Fair value
Freddie Mac Multifamily
Structured Pass AA+/Aaa/AA+ March 1, 2025 352
Freddie Mac Multifamily
Structured Pass AA+/Aaa/AA+ December 1, 2024 46
Freddie Mac Multifamily
Structured Pass AA+/Aaa/AA+ May 1, 2025 515
Freddie Mac Multifamily
Structured Pass AA+/Aaa/AA+ December 1, 2025 295
Freddie Mac Multifamily
Structured Pass AA+/Aaa/AA+ January 1, 2026 284
Freddie Mac Multifamily
Structured Pass AA+/Aaa/AA+ August 1, 2026 491
Freddie Mac Multifamily
Structured Pass AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 1, 2026 352
Freddie Mac Multifamily
Structured Pass AA+/Aaa/AA+ November 1, 2023 212
Freddie Mac Multifamily
Structured Pass AA+/Aaa/AAA June 1, 2025 33
Walmart Inc AA/Aa2/AA July 8, 2024 780
New York State Urban
Development Corp NR/NR/AA+ March 15, 2025 514
State Board of Administration Finance AA/Aa3/AA July 1, 2025 125
Rabobank Corporate Notes A+/Aa2/AA- August 22, 2024 783
California State Muni Bonds AA-/Aa2/AA March 1, 2027 219
Massachusetts Commonwealth Muni Bon
d
NR/Aa1/AAA July 15, 2025 507
Goldman Sachs Financial Square
Obligations Fund AAAm/Aaa-mf/NR - 21,740
First American Government
Obligation Fund AAAm/Aaa-mf/AAAmmf - 11,283
Cash and Cash Equivalent 15,477
Total $ 700,365
46
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Fair Value Hierarchy
The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by GAAP.
The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure fair value of the assets. The inputs and
techniques used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of risk associated with investing
in those securities.
Level 1 Inputs: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
accessible to the reporting entity at the measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs: Other than quoted prices included in Level 1 inputs that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 Inputs: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability used to measure fair value to the
extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little,
if any, market activity for the asset or liability at measurement date.
The following is a summary of the fair value hierarchy of the Airport’s cash and investments with fiscal
agent as of June 30, 2023 (in thousands):
Fair value measurement using
Quoted prices
in active Significant
markets for other
Investments identical observable Unobservable
Fair value exempt from assets inputs inputs
June 30, 2023 fair value (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Investments outside City Treasury:
State and local agencies
$
4,177 — — 4,177
S
upranationals 2,382 2,382
U.S. agencies 96,493 96,493
U.S. corporate bonds/notes (medium
term notes) 1,563 — — 1,563
U.
S
. treasury securities 547,250 547,250
C
ash and cash equivalents 15,477 15,477
Money market funds* 33,023 33,023
Total $ 700,365 48,500 547,250 104,615
* Investments exempt from fair value
Investments outside the City Treasury pool may consist of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Government
Agency securities, and other investments such as commercial paper, money market funds, negotiable
certificates of deposit, supranational securities, and other investments permitted under the applicable
bond documents. U.S. Treasury securities are valued using quoted prices in active markets and
classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. U.S. Government Agency securities are valued using
mid pricing and classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Investments exempt from fair value
treatment consist of money market mutual funds with investment holdings having maturities of one year
or less at the time of purchase.
47
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
The primary objectives of the Airport’s policy on investment of debt service reserve funds and debt
service funds (including principal and interest accounts) held by the Trustees are, in order of priority,
safety, liquidity, and yield.
Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments undertaken seek to
ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. As one strategy to attain this objective,
investments are diversified.
The term of any investment is based on the cash flow needed to meet the Airport’s debt service
requirements. Consequently, investment of any debt service reserve funds is limited to seven years or
less, and all monies invested in any principal and interest payment accounts are to mature no later than
the dates on which the principal or interest payments are due.
The Airport will maximize the retainable earnings of all bond proceeds after meeting the requirements of
safety and liquidity. After these objectives are met, the Airport’s investment policy will attempt to
achieve net investment yield as close as practicable to each bond fund’s arbitrage yield, if any.
Funds held by the Senior Trustee in funds and accounts established under the Airport Commission’s
Resolution No. 91-0210 adopted on December 3, 1991 (as amended and supplemented, the “1991
Master Bond Resolution”), are invested in “Permitted Investments” as defined in the 1991 Master Bond
Resolution.
Funds held by the Subordinate Trustee in funds and accounts established under the Airport
Commission’s Resolution No. 97-0146 adopted on May 20, 1997, as amended and supplemented (the
1997 Note Resolution) are invested in “Permitted Investments” as defined in the 1997 Note Resolution.
The Airport had approximately $700.4 million in investments held by, and in the name of, the Senior
Trustee and the Subordinate Trustee, collectively, as of June 30, 2023.
All other funds of the Airport are invested in accordance with (1) the City Treasurer’s policy and, if
applicable, (2) the 1991 Master Bond Resolution or the 1997 Note Resolution, as appropriate.
(4) Grants Receivable
The Airport receives federal funding from the FAA, the TSA, and other federal agencies. Grants receivable
of $30.3 million as of June 30, 2023, were based on actual costs incurred, subject to federal reimbursement
limits.
When determining the distribution of discretionary grants, the Secretary of Transportation may consider, as
a militating factor, whether the Airport uses its revenues for purposes other than capital or operating costs,
when those revenues exceed the amount used by the Airport for such costs in the base year ending June
30, 1995, as adjusted for inflation. The Airport Commission pays a portion of the Airport’s revenues to the
City’s General Fund as an annual service payment, in part as compensation for indirect services,
management and facilities provided by the City to the Airport. The annual service payment is considered to
be a noncapital, nonoperating cost for this purpose. With the exception of five fiscal years, the annual
service payment has exceeded the base year payment when adjusted for inflation since fiscal year 1995-
96.
48
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
In the past, the Commission has received a lower amount of FAA discretionary grants than it requested as a
result of the amount of the annual service payments. The FAA militated $6.7 million in discretionary grants
in the federal fiscal year ended September 30, 2023, and the Commission received $39.0 million in FAA
discretionary grants, which included Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Airport Terminal Program funding. The
FAA may reduce discretionary grants in the future. Furthermore, AIP funding may be reduced in the future
as a result of legislation or the failure of the U.S. Congress to pass an annual appropriation bill including
such funding. Reduction in grants awarded to the Commission could result in the delay or cancellation of
projects or the incurrence of additional debt by the Commission.
Grant-funded project costs are subject to audit by the funding agencies to ensure that the costs are
allowable under the grant agreements. If any project costs are disallowed, amounts recorded as grants
receivable will be reduced or refunded to the respective funding agencies.
49
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(5) Capital Assets
Capital assets consist of the following (in thousands):
July 1, 2022 Increases Decreases June 30, 2023
Capital assets not being depreciated/amortized:
Land $ 29,813 $ 29,813
Intangible assets 6,881 6,881
Construction in progress 771,911 310,492 (82,197) 1,000,206
Total capital assets not being
depreciated/amortized 808,605 310,492 (82,197) 1,036,900
Capital assets being depreciated/amortized:
Buildings, structures, and improvements 9,225,038 78,222 (16,503) 9,286,757
Equipment 939,236 3,020 (5,395) 936,861
Right to use asset 671 2,697 3,368
Intangible assets 37,610 740 (479) 37,871
Total capital assets being
depreciated/amortized 10,202,555 84,679 (22,377) 10,264,857
Less accumulated depreciation/amortization:
Buildings, structures, and improvements (3,587,917) (263,191) 16,504 (3,834,604)
Equipment (413,799) (88,100) 5,321 (496,578)
Right to use asset (278) (1,524) (1,802)
Intangible assets (32,093) (2,660) 478 (34,275)
Total accumulated
depreciation/amortization (4,034,087) (355,475) 22,303 (4,367,259)
Total capital assets being
depreciated/amortized, net 6,168,468 (270,796) (74) 5,897,598
Total capital assets, net $ 6,977,073 39,696 (82,271) $ 6,934,498
In fiscal year 2006-07, the Airport adopted a cost allocation plan to capture indirect costs as a component of
a building or other capital asset to reflect the full and true cost of a capital asset. In accordance with the
Uniform Guidance, the indirect costs capitalized for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, were $16.9
million.
For details on leases for Airport as lessee, see note 9.
50
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(6) Subordinate Commercial Paper Notes
On May 20, 1997, the Airport Commission adopted Resolution No. 97-0146 (as amended and
supplemented, the 1997 Note Resolution). The 1997 Note Resolution authorizes the issuance of
subordinate commercial paper (CP) notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed the lesser of
$600.0 million or the stated amount of the letter(s) of credit securing the CP notes.
The Airport issues CP notes in series based on tax status that are divided into subseries according to the
bank providing the applicable direct-pay letter of credit. In addition to the applicable letter of credit, the CP
notes are further secured by a pledge of the Net Revenues of the Airport, subject to the prior payment of
the Commission’s San Francisco International Airport Second Series Revenue Bonds (the Senior Bonds)
outstanding from time to time under Resolution No. 91-0210, adopted by the Commission on December 3,
1991 (as amended and supplemented, the 1991 Master Bond Resolution).
Net Revenues are generally defined in the 1997 Note Resolution as all revenues earned by the
Commission from or with respect to its construction, possession, management, supervision, maintenance,
extension, operation, use and control of the Airport (not including certain amounts specified in the 1997
Note Resolution), less Operation and Maintenance Expenses (as defined in the 1997 Note Resolution).
See note 8.
The CP notes are special, limited obligations of the Commission, and the payment of the principal of and
interest on the CP notes is secured by a pledge of, lien on and security interest in the Net Revenues and
amounts in the funds and accounts as provided in the 1997 Note Resolution, subject to the prior payment
of principal of and interest on the Senior Bonds. The CP notes are secured on a parity with any other bonds
or other obligations from time to time outstanding under the 1997 Note Resolution.
Events of default for the CP notes include nonpayment events, bankruptcy events, noncompliance with
covenants, and default under the 1991 Master Bond Resolution. The CP notes are not subject to
acceleration.
Events of default with respect to the letters of credit supporting the CP notes include nonpayment events
(both on CP notes and Senior Bonds), bankruptcy events, noncompliance with covenants, default on debt
in excess of a specified threshold amount, default under the 1997 Note Resolution, or a determination of
taxability of interest on the tax-exempt CP notes. A downgrade of the Commission’s Senior Bonds to below
“Baa1” by Moody’s or “BBB+” by S&P or Fitch is an event of termination with respect to all of the letters of
credit supporting the CP notes. In addition, the State Street Bank and Trust letter of credit supporting
$100.0 million of CP notes includes certain changes in law affecting the Commission’s payment obligations
to the bank as events of termination. Remedies include the letter of credit bank’s ability to stop issuance of
the CP notes it supports and to require a final drawing on the letter of credit. If not repaid when due,
drawings under the respective letters of credit supporting the CP notes are amortized over a three-, four-,
or five-year period.
51
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
As of June 30, 2023, the CP program was supported by six direct-pay letters of credit with a combined
maximum stated principal amount of $600.0 million, from State Street Bank and Trust Company ($100.0
million, expires May 2, 2024), Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, acting through its New York Branch
($100.0 million, expires April 7, 2027), Barclays Bank PLC ($100.0 million, expires May 24, 2024), Sumitomo
Mitsui Banking Corporation, acting through its New York Branch ($100.0 million, expires June 6, 2028),
Barclays Bank PLC ($125.0 million, expires April 23, 2027), and Bank of America, N.A. ($75.0 million,
expires May 4, 2026). Each of the letters of credit supports a separate subseries of CP notes.
As of June 30, 2023, there were no obligations other than the CP notes outstanding under the 1997 Note
Resolution.
During fiscal year 2022-23, the Airport issued new money CP notes in the aggregate principal amount of
$392.0 million (AMT), $22.5 million (Non-AMT), and $2.8 million (Taxable) to fund capital improvement
projects.
The following table summarizes CP activity during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 (in thousands):
Interest rate July 1, 2022 Increases Decreases June 30, 2023
Commercial paper (Taxable) - short term 3.50%-5.45% $ 2,700 2,750 5,450
Commercial paper (AMT) - long term 2.32%-3.42% 65,225 392,000 457,225
Commercial paper (Non-AMT) - long term 2.42%-3.35% 18,050 22,500 40,550
Total $ 85,975 417,250 503,225
The table presents the commercial paper notes' net increase and decrease activities during fiscal year FY2022-23. This
excludes the issuance of commercial paper notes to repay maturing commercial paper notes.
As of June 30, 2023, the Airport had $503.2 million in outstanding commercial paper notes including $497.8 million that was
refunded by the Series 2023C/D bonds issued on November 15, 2023. The $497.8 million has been reclassed to long-term
commercial paper notes on the financial statements as of June 30, 2023. See note 17.
52
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(7) Long-Term Obligations
Long-term obligation activity for the year ended June 30, 2023, is as follows (in thousands):
D
ue w
i
t
hi
n
J
u
ly 1
,
2022
I
ncreases
D
ecrease
s
J
une
30
,
2023
one
y
ear
Revenue bonds payable $ 8,099,275 241,915 (291,525) 8,049,665 87,750
Add unamortized premiums 986,339 21,584 (53,367) 954,556
Total revenue bonds
payable 9,085,614 263,499 (344,892) 9,004,221 87,750
Commercial paper notes - long term 497,775 497,775
Compensated absences 24,184 11,474 (11,471) 24,187 12,326
Accrued workers compensation 12,093 5,929 (5,455) 12,567 2,710
Estimated claims payable 2,158 2,136 (22) 4,272 122
Other liabilities and leases payable 469 2,697 (1,980) 1,186 816
Net OPEB liability (see note 12b) 251,367 6,400 257,767
Net pension liability (asset) (see note 12a) (153,872) 316,072 162,200
Derivative instruments 10,192 (10,192)
Total $ 9,232,205 789,910 (57,940) 9,964,175 103,724
Bond Transactions and Balances
On December 3, 1991, the Commission adopted Resolution No. 91-0210 (as amended and supplemented,
the 1991 Master Bond Resolution). The 1991 Master Bond Resolution authorizes the issuance from time to
time of San Francisco International Airport Second Series Revenue Bonds to finance and refinance capital
projects at the Airport. The maximum principal amount of such bonds is not limited by the 1991 Master
Bond Resolution, but the Commission must satisfy an additional bonds test prior to the issuance of any
such bonds. The 1991 Master Bond Resolution constitutes a contract between the Commission and the
registered owners of the bonds under which the Commission has irrevocably pledged the Net Revenues of
the Airport to the payment of the principal of and interest on the bonds.
Net Revenues are generally defined in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution as all revenues earned by the
Commission from or with respect to its possession, management, supervision, operation, and control of the
Airport (not including certain amounts specified in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution), less Operation and
Maintenance Expenses (as defined in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution). See note 8. Net Revenues
generally exclude revenues from Airport facilities that have been designated by the Commission as
“Special Facilities” and expenses of Special Facilities payable from such excluded revenues.
The bonds are special, limited obligations of the Commission, and the principal of and interest on the bonds
are payable solely from and secured by a pledge of, lien on and security interest in the Net Revenues and
amounts in the funds and accounts provided in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution. The payment of the
53
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
principal of and interest on all previously issued bonds under the 1991 Master Bond Resolution is secured
by a pledge of, lien on and security interest in Net Revenues on a parity with the pledge, lien and security
interest securing any additional bonds issued thereunder.
Events of default for the bonds include nonpayment events, bankruptcy events, and noncompliance with
covenants, including the rate covenant described below. The bonds are not subject to acceleration.
Payment of principal, interest and purchase price of bonds that bear interest at variable interest rates are
supported by letters of credit. Events of default with respect to the letters of credit supporting the bonds
include nonpayment events, bankruptcy events, noncompliance with covenants, default on debt in excess
of a specified threshold amount, default under the 1991 Master Bond Resolution, or a determination of
taxability of interest on tax-exempt bonds supported by the letter of credit. A downgrade of the
Commission’s Senior Bonds to below “Baa1” or “BBB+” or withdrawal or suspension of a bond rating for
credit-related reasons by any rating agency is an event of termination under the letters of credit supporting
the bonds. Remedies include the letter of credit bank’s ability to cause a mandatory tender of the supported
bonds or to accelerate amounts due and payable to the bank; provided that payments made on a parity
with the bonds are capped based on provisions in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution. If there are no default
events pending, drawings under the respective letters of credit supporting the bonds are amortized over a
three- or five-year period; provided that payments made on a parity with the bonds are capped based on
provisions in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution.
54
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
As of June 30, 2023, long-term revenue bonds consisted of the following (in thousands):
Description Date of issue Interest rate June 30, 2023
Second Series Revenue Bonds:
Issue 2009D 11/04/09 3.00%-3.50% $ 51,615
Issue 2013A 07/31/13 5.00%-5.50% 241,790
Issue 2014A 09/24/14 5.00% 376,310
Issue 2014B 09/24/14 5.00% 97,290
Issue 2016A 02/25/16 4.00%-5.00% 139,020
Issue 2016B 09/29/16 5.00% 574,970
Issue 2016C 09/29/16 5.00% 165,155
Issue 2016D 09/29/16 5.00% 100,280
Issue 2017A 10/31/17 5.00% 339,580
Issue 2017B 10/31/17 5.00% 231,985
Issue 2017D 10/31/17 5.00% 72,015
Issue 2018D 05/30/18 5.00%-5.25% 722,800
Issue 2018E 05/30/18 5.00% 116,275
Issue 2018F 05/30/18 3.80% 7,025
Issue 2018G 05/30/18 5.00% 35,660
Issue 2018B** 06/06/18 Variable rate 138,170
Issue 2018C** 06/06/18 Variable rate 138,170
Issue 2019A 02/07/19 4.00%-5.00% 1,176,215
Issue 2019B 02/07/19 5.00% 91,280
Issue 2019C 02/07/19 3.51% 8,010
Issue 2019D 02/07/19 5.00% 373,295
Issue 2019E 09/10/19 4.00%-5.00% 773,475
Issue 2019F 09/10/19 5.00% 106,925
Issue 2019G 09/10/19 1.98%-2.39% 12,285
Issue 2019H 09/10/19 5.00% 148,195
Issue 2020A 08/20/20 4.00%-5.00% 109,520
Issue 2020B 08/20/20 4.00% 51,575
Issue 2020C 08/20/20 2.96% 130,180
Issue 2021A 04/21/21 5.00% 195,225
Issue 2021B 04/21/21 5.00% 129,070
Issue 2021C 04/21/21 3.35% 222,810
Issue 2022A 02/08/22 4.00%-5.00% 301,530
Issue 2022B 02/08/22 4.00%-5.00% 236,475
Issue 2022C 02/08/22 2.58%-3.33% 194,815
Issue 2023A 03/01/23 5.00% 161,165
Issue 2023B 03/01/23 5.00% 79,510
8,049,665
Unamortized premium 954,556
Total revenue bonds payable 9,004,221
Less current portion (87,750)
Total long-term revenue bonds payable $ 8,916,471
** The Commission used the proceeds of the Series 2018B/C Bonds to purchase $260.0 million of San Francisco
International Airport Hotel Special Facility Revenue Bonds; to finance the development and construction of an AirTrain
station adjacent to the on-Airport Hotel; and to pay costs of issuance of the Series 2018B/C Bonds.
55
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Interest Rate Swaps
The Airport entered into forward starting interest rate swaps in connection with the anticipated issuance of
its Second Series Variable Rate Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A, on February 10, 2010. The
swap structure was intended as a means to increase the Airport’s debt service savings by setting a low
synthetic fixed rate in advance of the first date that tax-exempt variable rate refunding bonds could be
issued in the future to refinance callable bonds.
The Airport terminated these interest rate swaps on August 9, 2019 and March 1, 2023.
As of June 30, 2023, all swaps had been terminated.
Debt Service Reserve and Covenants; Contingency Account
The Airport Commission issues its senior lien San Francisco International Airport Second Series Revenue
Bonds under the 1991 Master Bond Resolution, which provides, among other things, the general terms and
conditions of the bonds, the funds and accounts relating to the bonds, and certain covenants made by the
Airport Commission for the benefit of bondholders. Such covenants include not creating or allowing
creation of liens on the Revenues or disposing of any property necessary to maintaining revenues or
operating the Airport and maintaining specified levels of insurance or self-insurance. The Airport
Commission may establish one or more reserve accounts with different reserve requirements to secure one
or more series of bonds. Accordingly, the Airport Commission has established three reserve accounts in
the Reserve Fund: the Issue 1 Reserve Account, the 2009 Reserve Account, and the 2017 Reserve
Account, all of which are held by the Senior Trustee. In conjunction with the defeasance of the Series
2010D Bonds on August 20, 2020, the 2009 Reserve Account was closed. As permitted under the 1991
Master Bond Resolution, the Airport Commission may establish separate reserve accounts for individual
series of bonds or may issue bonds without a reserve account.
Issue 1 Reserve Account – The Issue 1 Reserve Account is the Airport’s original parity reserve account
established in connection with the first issuance of bonds under the 1991 Master Bond Resolution and
which now secures most of the Airport Commission’s outstanding bonds. Specifically, as of June 30, 2023,
the Issue 1 Reserve Account secures all outstanding bonds except the series listed below as being
secured by the 2017 Reserve Account, and except for Series 2018B and Series 2018C. The Airport
Commission may designate any series of bonds as a “participating series” secured by the Issue 1 Reserve
Account. The reserve requirement is equal to the maximum annual debt service on the outstanding bonds
secured by the Issue 1 Reserve Account accruing in any year during the life of all participating series of
bonds secured by the Issue 1 Reserve Account.
2017 Reserve Account – The Airport Commission has established an additional pooled reserve account
identified as the 2017 Reserve Account in the Reserve Fund, as security for each series of bonds (a 2017
Reserve Series) that is designated as being secured by the 2017 Reserve Account. As of June 30, 2023,
only the Series 2017D, 2019B, and 2019D Bonds are secured by the 2017 Reserve Account. The reserve
requirement for the 2017 Reserve Account is equal to the lesser of: (i) the maximum amount of aggregate
annual debt service for all 2017 Reserve Series Bonds in any fiscal year during the period from the date of
calculation to the final scheduled maturity of the 2017 Reserve Series Bonds, (ii) 10.0% of the outstanding
aggregate principal amount of all 2017 Reserve Series Bonds (provided that the issue price of a Series of
2017 Reserve Series Bonds will be used in this calculation if such Series was sold with an original issue
56
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
discount that exceeded 2% of the principal of such Series on its original date of sale), and (iii) 125% of the
average aggregate annual debt service for all 2017 Reserve Series Bonds.
Reserve Policies – Under the 1991 Master Bond Resolution, the Airport Commission may satisfy a portion
of a reserve requirement by depositing with the Senior Trustee one or more reserve policies issued by a
credit provider meeting specified rating requirements. However, the 1991 Master Bond Resolution does not
require that those ratings be maintained after the date of deposit. As of June 30, 2023, the Issue 1 Reserve
Account contains reserve policies. Each of the providers of the reserve policies in the reserve accounts
was rated “AAA” at the time the policies were deposited. However, as a result of the financial crisis that
began in 2007, all of the major municipal bond insurance companies have been downgraded, and several
are no longer providing current financial and operating information. In addition, under the terms of several
of the reserve policies, the value of the policies is adjusted downward from time to time as related bonds
are refunded and such policies have experienced a reduction in value and may have experienced a
reduction in value to zero. The policies in the Issue 1 Reserve Account with remaining value have
termination dates. The Airport has periodically deposited additional cash in the Issue 1 Reserve Account to
satisfy the reserve requirement and compensate for the diminished value or downgraded providers of these
reserve policies.
Contingency Account Under the 1991 Master Bond Resolution, the City Treasurer holds the Contingency
Account as an account within the Revenue Fund, and the Commission may deposit in the Contingency
Account such amounts, if any, as the Commission may determine from time to time. Monies in the
Contingency Account may be applied (i) to pay Operation and Maintenance Expenses; (ii) to make any
required payments or deposits to pay or secure the payment of the principal or purchase price of or interest
or redemption premium on the 1991 Resolution Bonds; and (iii) to pay the cost of any additions,
improvements, repairs, renewals or replacements to the Airport, in each case only if and to the extent that
monies otherwise available to make such payments or deposits are insufficient.
Rate Covenant – Under the terms of the 1991 Master Bond Resolution, the Airport has covenanted that it
will establish and at all times maintain rentals, rates, fees, and charges for the use of the Airport and for
services rendered by the Airport so that:
(a)
Net Revenues (as defined in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution) in each fiscal year will be at least
sufficient (i) to make all required debt service payments and deposits in such fiscal year with
respect to the bonds, any subordinate bonds, and any general obligation bonds issued by the
City
for the benefit of the Airport (there have been no such general obligation bonds outstanding for
more than 30 years), and (ii) to make the annual service payments to the City, and
(b)
Net Revenues, together with any transfer from the Contingency Account to the Revenue Account
(both held by the City Treasurer), in each fiscal year will be at least equal to 125% of aggregate
annual debt service with respect to the bonds for such fiscal year.
The methods required by the 1991 Master Bond Resolution for calculating debt service coverage differ
from those required under GAAP, which are used to determine amounts reported in the Airport’s financial
statements. For example, the 1991 Master Bond Resolution includes in the definition of Operating and
Maintenance Expenses (which is used to calculate Net Revenues) “the payment of pension charges … with
respect to employees of the Commission…” (emphasis added) and excludes a number of noncash accrual
57
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
items. Accordingly, the Commission excludes from its rate covenant calculations any noncash accrued
pension obligations and includes only pension obligations actually paid during the fiscal year. As another
example, the 1991 Master Bond Resolution excludes from the definition of Operating and Maintenance
Expenses “any expense for which, or to the extent to which, the Commission is or will be paid or
reimbursed from or through any source that is not included or includable as Revenues,” and excludes from
the definition of Revenues “grants-in-aid, donations and/or bequests.” Accordingly, the Commission
excludes from its rate covenant both grant funds used toward operating costs (such as the CRRSAA and
ARPA grant funds) and the operating costs reimbursed using such grant funds.
Post-Issuance Compliance with Federal Tax Law
The Airport follows certain federal tax law post-issuance compliance procedures that are intended to
ensure that proceeds of its tax-exempt bonds are invested and expended consistent with applicable federal
tax law, including the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Regulations promulgated thereunder, and other
applicable guidance from the U.S. Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
(a)
Second Series Revenue Bonds (Capital Plan Bonds)
Pursuant to resolutions adopted between fiscal years 2008 and 2022, as of June 30, 2023, the Airport
Commission has authorized the issuance of up to $10.8 billion of San Francisco International Airport
Second Series Revenue Bonds (Capital Plan Bonds) to finance and refinance the construction,
acquisition, equipping, and development of capital projects undertaken by the Airport, including retiring
all or a portion of the Airport’s outstanding subordinate commercial paper notes issued for capital
projects, funding debt service reserves, funding capitalized interest, and for paying costs of issuance.
As of June 30, 2023, $4.2 billion of the authorized capital plan bonds remained unissued.
(b)
Second Series Revenue Refunding Bonds
Pursuant to resolutions adopted between fiscal years 2005 and 2023, as of June 30, 2023, the Airport
Commission has authorized the issuance of up to $17.1 billion of San Francisco International Airport
Second Series Revenue Refunding Bonds for the purposes of refunding outstanding 1991 Master Bond
Resolution Bonds and outstanding subordinate commercial paper notes, funding debt service reserves,
and paying costs of issuance, including any related bond redemption premiums. As of June 30, 2023,
$7.2 billion of the authorized refunding bonds remained authorized but unissued.
During fiscal year 2022-23, the Airport issued the following bonds for refunding and other purposes
under the 1991 Master Bond Resolution:
On March 1, 2023, the Airport issued its fixed rate Second Series Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series
2023A (AMT) and Second Series Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2023B (Non-AMT/Governmental
Purpose), in an aggregate principal amount of $241.9 million to refund a combined $261.5 million of its
Series 2010A Bonds, Series 2013A Bonds, and Series 2013B Bonds, to fund the termination payment
of an interest rate swap, and to pay costs of issuance.
The proceeds of the Series 2023A and Series 2023B Bonds (consisting of $241.9 million par
amount
and original issue premium of $21.6 million, less an underwriters’ discount of $0.5 million), together
with $8.6 million accumulated in the debt service fund were used to deposit $265.0 million into
redemption accounts and escrow funds with the Senior Trustee to refund $261.5 million in revenue
58
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
bonds as described below (in thousands), $5.5 million to fund the swap termination payment, and $1.1
million to pay costs of issuance.
The Series 2010A bonds were redeemed on March 31, 2023, and Series 2013A bonds and Series
2013B bonds identified in the table below were redeemed on May 1, 2023.
The following table (in thousands) shows the outstanding balance after the bonds were refunded with
the issuance of Series 2023A/B bonds:
Second Series Revenue Bonds
A
mount
Issue: Interest Rate June 30, 2022 Refunded June 30,2023
Series 2010A1 (AMT) variable $ 71,845 71,845 -
Series 2010A2 (AMT) variable 47,900 47,900 -
Series 2013A (AMT) 5.00%-5.50% 295,650 53,860 241,790
Series 2013B (Non-
AMT/Governmental Purpose)
5.00% 87,860 87,860 -
Total
503,255 $ 261,465 241,790
In aggregate, the Series 2023A/B refundings resulted in the recognition of a deferred accounting loss of
$3.5 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023. The Series 2023A/B refundings decreased the
Airport’s aggregate gross debt service payments by approximately $23.9 million over the life of the
bonds and obtained an economic gain (the difference between the present values of the debt service
on the old debt and the new debt) of $10.6 million.
(c)
Variable Rate Demand Bonds
As of June 30, 2023, the Airport Commission had an outstanding aggregate principal amount of $276.3
million, consisting of Second Series Variable Rate Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2018B and
Series 2018C, (collectively, the “Variable Rate Bonds”) with final maturity dates of May 1, 2058 (Series
2018B and 2018C). The Variable Rate Bonds are long-term, tax-exempt bonds that currently bear
interest at a rate that is adjusted weekly, and that are subject to tender at par at the option of the holder
thereof on seven days’ notice. Any tendered Variable Rate Bonds are remarketed by the applicable
remarketing agent in the secondary market to other investors. The interest rate on the Variable Rate
Bonds can be converted to other interest rate modes, including a term rate or fixed rates to maturity,
upon appropriate notice by the Airport.
The scheduled payment of the principal of and interest on, and payment of purchase price of, the
Variable Rate Bonds is secured by separate irrevocable letters of credit issued to the Senior Trustee for
the benefit of the applicable bondholders by the banks identified in the table below.
Amounts drawn under a letter of credit that are not reimbursed by the Airport constitute “Repayment
Obligations” under the 1991 Master Bond Resolution and are accorded the status of other outstanding
59
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
bonds to the extent provided in the Resolution. The commitment fees for the letters of credit range
between 0.34% and 0.37% per annum. As of June 30, 2023, there were no unreimbursed draws under
these facilities.
The letters of credit securing the Variable Rate Bonds included in long-term debt as of June 30, 2023,
are as follows (in thousands):
Series 2018B Series 2018C
Principal amount $ 138,170 138,170
Expiration date
Credit provider
June 3, 2026
Barclays
(1)
April 5, 2027
SMBC
(2)
(1) Barclays Bank PLC
(2) Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, acting through its New York branch
(d)
Hotel Special Facility Bonds
Pursuant to resolutions adopted in fiscal years 2017, 2018, and 2019, the Airport Commission
authorized the issuance of $260.0 million of Special Facility Bonds to finance an on-Airport Ho
tel.
These resolutions also designated the on-Airport Hotel as a “Special Facility” under the 1991 Master
Bond Resolution, which allows the hotel revenues to be segregated from the Airport’s other revenue
s
and used to pay hotel operating expenses and debt service on the Hotel Special Facility Bonds through
the Hotel Special Facility Bond trustee. On June 6, 2018, the Airport issued its fixed rate Special
Facility Revenue Bonds (San Francisco International Airport Hotel), Series 2018 (the “Hotel Special
Facility Bonds”), in the aggregate principal amount of $260.0 million to finance the on-Airport Hotel and
to fund a capitalized interest account.
The Hotel Special Facility Bonds are issued pursuant to a Trust Agreement (the “Hotel Trust
Agreement”). On February 26, 2021, the Hotel Special Facility Bonds and the trust agreement pursuant
to which they were issued were amended and restated, including to delay the initial principal repayment
until April 1, 2025 (instead of April 1, 2022) and temporarily reduce the interest rate on the Hotel
Special Facility Bonds from 3.00% to 0.086% from April 1, 2020 through September 30, 2023. The
interest rate will then increase incrementally until it is restored to 3.00% beginning on April 1, 2029. In
addition, the amendments provided that October 1, 2020 is no longer an interest payment date, and
there is no requirement to pay interest accrued on the Hotel Special Facility Bonds until October 1,
2023. The maximum principal amount of the Hotel Special Facility Bonds is not limited by the Hotel
Trust Agreement, but the Commission must satisfy an additional bonds test prior to the issuance of any
such bonds.
The Hotel Special Facility Bonds are limited obligations of the Commission. Under the Hotel Trust
Agreement, the Commission has pledged the Revenues of the on-Airport Hotel, together with other
assets, to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Hotel Special Facility Bonds. Revenues
are generally defined in the Hotel Trust Agreement as all revenue and income of any kind deri
ved
directly or indirectly from operations at the on-Airport Hotel (not including certain amounts specified in
the Hotel Trust Agreement). Operating expenses of the on-Airport Hotel are payable prior to payment
60
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
of principal of and interest on the Hotel Special Facility Bonds. The Commission does not maintain a
reserve account for the Hotel Special Facility Bonds. The Hotel Special Facility Bonds are subject to
acceleration upon the occurrence of an event of default. Events of default include nonpayment events,
bankruptcy events, noncompliance with covenants, condemnation of the hotel, or a failure by the
Commission to maintain a third-party manager for the hotel. The Hotel Special Facility Bonds are not
payable from or secured by the Airport’s Net Revenues (as defined under the 1991 Master Bond
Resolution). However, because the Airport is the owner of the on-Airport Hotel, the Airport is obligated
to repay the Hotel Special Facility Bonds from the net revenues of the hotel.
Because the Airport is the issuer of the Hotel Special Facility Bonds and the sole beneficiary of the trust
entity serving as holder of the Hotel Special Facility Bonds, neither the Hotel Special Facility Bonds
debt service payments nor the Airport’s receipts from the trust are included in the accompanying
financial statements. The financial statements net the interest income received from the trust against
the combined interest expenses of the Hotel Special Facility Bonds and the Series 2018B/C Bonds.
As of June 30, 2023, the Airport Commission had $260.0 million of outstanding Hotel Special Facility
Bonds.
(e)
Derivative Instruments
As of June 30, 2023, the Airport did not have any outstanding derivative instruments.
(f)
Debt Service Reserves and Requirements
Issue 1 Reserve Account
As of June 30, 2023, the reserve requirement for the Issue 1 Reserve Account was $534.9 million,
which was satisfied by $539.5 million of cash and investment securities, and reserve fund surety
policies in the initial principal amount of $108.6 million. All of the providers of such reserve policies have
one or more credit ratings below the Airport’s rating or are no longer rated. In addition, $27.5 million of
such surety policies have likely experienced a reduction in value in accordance with their terms.
2017 Reserve Acc
ount
As of June 30, 2023, the reserve requirement for the 2017 Reserve Account was $40.6 million, which
was satisfied by $57.1 million in cash and investment securities.
Series Not Secured by Reserve Accounts
The Airport Commission does not maintain reserve accounts for its Second Series Variable Rate
Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2018B/C, all of which are secured by letters of credit.
61
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Debt Service Requirements
Revenue bond debt service requirements to maturity as of June 30, 2023, are as follows (in thousands):
Principal Interest Total
Fiscal year:
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029-2033
2034-2038
2039-2043
2044-2048
2049-2053
2054-2058
$ 87,750
163,515
203,310
209,165
224,490
771,495
989,455
1,625,605
2,097,165
1,599,295
78,420
382,727
378,480
370,590
360,813
350,725
1,634,223
1,435,346
1,129,721
682,928
167,368
7,839
470,477
541,995
573,900
569,978
575,215
2,405,718
2,424,801
2,755,326
2,780,093
1,766,663
86,259
Total $ 8,049,665 6,900,760 14,950,425
The table below presents the revenue bond debt service requirements in the event the letters of credit
securing the Airport’s outstanding variable rate bonds had to be drawn upon to pay such bonds and the
amount drawn had to be repaid by the Airport pursuant to the terms of the related agreements with the
banks providing such letters of credit (in thousands):
Principal Interest Total
Fiscal year:
2024 $ 87,750 382,727 470,477
2025 163,515 378,480 541,995
2026 341,480 371,008 712,488
2027 346,625 355,997 702,622
2028 223,370
34
1,749 565,119
2029-2033 760,125
1,
590,224 2,350,349
2034-2038 965,025 1,393,977 2,359,002
2039-2043 1,584,155
1,
093,391 2,677,546
2044-2048 2,043,315 65
4,230 2,697,545
2049-2053 1,534,305 148,139 1,682,444
Total $ 8,049,665
6,709,922 14,759,587
62
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(g)
Cash Defeasance of Bonds
On June 28, 2023, the Airport defeased $28.8 million of its Series 2019D Bonds, using monies
previously deposited by the Commission in the Debt Service Fund.
The outstanding balance for Series 2019D Bonds for the year ended June 30, 2023 is as follows (in
thousands):
Bond Series
2019D
June 30, 2022
$ 402,115
Cash Defeasance
Amount
28,820
June 30, 2023
373,295
(8) Pledged Revenue
The Airport Commission has pledged all of the Net Revenues of the Airport to repay the following
obligations when due, in order of priority, (1) the San Francisco International Airport Second Series
Revenue Bonds and Revenue Refunding Bonds (collectively, Senior Bonds) issued and to be issued under
the Commission’s Resolution No. 91-0210 adopted on December 3, 1991 (as amended and supplemented,
the “1991 Master Bond Resolution”), and amounts due with respect to the letters of credit supporting the
Senior Bonds to the extent provided in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution, (2) the San Francisco
International Airport Subordinate Commercial Paper Notes and any other obligations (Subordinate Bonds)
issued and to be issued under the Commission’s Resolution No. 97-0146 adopted on May 20, 1997 (as
amended and supplemented, the “1997 Note Resolution”) and amounts due to reimburse drawings under
the letters of credit supporting the Commercial Paper Notes, (3) remaining amounts due to reimburse
drawings under the letters of credit securing the Senior Bonds, and (4) interest rate swap termination
payments. The Senior Bonds and Commercial Paper Notes are issued to finance capital projects at the
Airport (including the funding of reserves) and to refund previously issued Senior Bonds and Commercial
Paper Notes. The pledges of Net Revenues described above are in force so long as the secured
obligations are outstanding. As of June 30, 2023, the final maturities of the obligations secured by the Net
Revenues are Senior Bonds that mature in fiscal year 2057-58.
Net Revenues are defined in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution and the 1997 Note Resolution as Revenues
less Operation and Maintenance Expenses. Revenues are defined to include all revenues earned by the
Commission with respect to the Airport, as determined in accordance with GAAP. Revenues do not include:
(a) Investment income from monies in (i) the Construction Fund, (ii) the Debt Service Fund which
constitute capitalized interest, or (iii) the Reserve Fund if and to the extent there is any deficiency
therein.
(b) Interest income on, and any profit realized from, the investment of the proceeds of any Special
Facility Bonds (as defined in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution).
(c) Special Facility Revenues (as defined in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution) and any income
realized from the investment thereof unless designated as Revenues by the Commission.
(d) Any passenger facility or similar charge levied by or on behalf of the Commission unless
designated as Revenues by the Commission.
(e) Grants-in-aid, donations and bequests.
63
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(f)
Insurance proceeds not deemed to be Revenues in accordance with
GAAP.
(g) The proceeds of any condemnation award.
(h) The proceeds of any sale of land, buildings or equipment.
(i) Any money received by or for the account of the Commission from the levy or collection of taxes
upon a
ny property of the City and, with respect to the 1991 Master Bond Resolution onl
y.
(j)
Any Customer Facility Charge (as defined in the 1991 Master Resolution) or similar charge levied
by or on behalf of the Commission against customers unless designated as Revenues by the
Commission.
(k) Any Federal Subsidy Payments (as defined in the 1991 Master Resolution) unless designated as
Revenues by the Commission.
Operation an
d Maintenance Expenses are defined in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution and the 1997 Note
Resolution to include all expenses of the Commission incurred for the operation and maintenance of the
Airport, as determined in accordance with GAAP. Operation and Maintenance Expenses do not include:
(a) The principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Senior Bonds or Subordinate Bonds (including
Commercial Paper Notes).
(b) Any allowance for amortization, depreciation or obsolescence of the Airport.
(c) Any expense for which, or to the extent to which, the Commission will be paid or reimbursed from
or through any source that is not included or includable as Revenues.
(d) Any extraordinary items arising from the early extinguishment of debt.
(e) Annual Service Payments to the City.
(f) Any costs, or charges made therefor, for capital additions, replacements or improvements to the
Airport which, under GAAP, are properly chargeable to a capital account or reserve for
depreciation.
(g) Any losses from the sale, abandonment, reclassification, revaluation or other disposition of any
Airport p
roperties. Operation and Maintenance Expenses include the payment of pension char
ges
and proportionate payments to such compensation and other insurance or outside reserve funds as
the Commission may establish or the Board of Supervisors may require with respect to
Commission employees.
64
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
For fiscal year 2022-23, the calculation of Net Revenues excluded $23.8 million of revenue from the
American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) grant reimbursements received by the Airport, which are not includable
as revenue, and excluded $23.8 million of operating expenses that were reimbursed using the ARPA grant
funds.
Amount
Bonds issued with revenue pledge $ 241,915
Bond principal and interest remaining due at the end of the
fiscal year 14,950,425
Commercial paper issued with subordinate revenue pledge 417,250
Commercial paper principal and interest remaining due at
the end of the fiscal year 504,135
Net revenues 511,495
Bond principal and interest paid in the fiscal year 400,509
Commercial paper principal, interest and fees paid in the
fiscal year 6,291
Pledged Revenue of the On-Airport Hotel
Pursuant to the Hotel Trust Agreement, the Airport Commission has pledged all of the Revenues of the on-
Airport Hotel and certain other assets pledged under the Amended and Restated Hotel Trust Agreement to
repay the Hotel Special Facility Bonds, all in accordance with the Hotel Trust Agreement. This pledge is in
force so long as the Hotel Special Facility Bonds are outstanding. The Hotel Special Facility Bonds will
mature in fiscal year 2057-58 and are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption each year starting in
2025.
Revenues are defined in the Hotel Trust Agreement as the Total Operating Revenues, including any
insurance proceeds, condemnation proceeds, performance bonds and guaranties and all interest, profits or
other income derived from the investment of amounts in any fund or account established pursuant to the
Hotel Trust Agreement (except any subaccounts of the Construction Fund that are otherwise pledged and
the Rebate Fund).
Total Operating Revenues are defined in the Hotel Trust Agreement as all revenue and income of any kind
derived directly or indirectly from operations at the on-Airport Hotel, whether or not arranged by, for or on
behalf of another person or at another location, properly attributable to the period under consideration
(including rentals or other payments from licensees or concessionaires of retail space in the hotel, but not
gross receipts of such licensees or concessionaires), determined in accordance with the Uniform System of
Accounts and, to the extent consistent therewith, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, but do not
include:
(a) Certain excluded taxes (such as sales tax) and other charges.
(b) Receipts from the financing, sale or other disposition of capital assets and other items not in the
ordinary course of the hotel’s operations and income derived from securities and other property
acquired and held for investment.
65
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(c) Receipts from awards or sales in connection with any taking, from other transfers in lieu of and
under the threat of any taking, and other receipts in connection with any taking, but only to the
extent that such amounts are specifically identified as compensation for alterations or physical
damage to the hotel.
(d) Proceeds of any insurance or sureties, including the proceeds of any business interruption
insurance.
(e) Rebates, discounts, or credits of a similar nature (not including charge or credit card discounts,
which shall not constitute a deduction from revenues in determining Total Operating Revenues, but
shall constitute an Operating Expense of the hotel).
(f) Consideration received at the hotel for hotel accommodations, goods and services to be provided
at other hotels although arranged by, for or on behalf of, the hotel manager; provided, that such
consideration is recognized by such other hotels.
(g) Consideration received at other hotels for hotel accommodations, goods and services to be
provided at the Hotel arranged by, for or on behalf of, such other hotels; provided, that such
consideration is recognized by such other hotels.
(h) Notwithstanding any contrary requirements of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, all
gratuities collected for the benefit of and paid directly to hotel personnel.
(i) Proceeds of any financing.
(j) The initial operating funds and working capital loans and any other funds provided by the
Commission to the hotel manager whether for hotel Operating Expenses or otherwise.
(k) Other income or proceeds that do not result from: (i) the use or occupancy of the hotel, or any part
thereof, or (ii) the sale of goods, services or other items by or from the hotel in the ordinary course
of business.
(l) Interest earned on funds held in any fund or account under the Hotel Trust Agreement.
(m) The value of any complimentary rooms, goods or services.
(n) Refunds to hotel guests of any sums or credits to any hotel customers for lost or damaged items.
(o) Refunds to parking customers of any sums or credits to any parking customers for lost or damaged
items.
Generally, the Hotel Special Facility Bonds are paid after provision for the Operating Expenses of the hotel
and payment of taxes and insurance premiums have been made. The Hotel Special Facility Bonds are not
payable from Net Revenues, as that term is defined in the 1991 Master Bond Resolution.
66
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Pledged Facilities Rent from Fuel System Lease with SFO FUEL COMPANY LLC
The Commission entered into a Fuel System Lease dated as of September 1, 1997, as amended, with SFO
FUEL COMPANY LLC (SFO Fuel), a special purpose limited liability company formed by certain airlines
operating at the Airport. The facilities rent payable by SFO Fuel has been pledged and assigned to the
bond trustee to secure the repayment of the Commission’s San Francisco International Airport Special
Facilities Lease Revenue Bonds (SFO FUEL COMPANY LLC), Series 2019A and 2019B (the “Fuel
Bonds”), which were outstanding in the aggregate principal amounts of $96.7 million as of June 30, 2023.
The Fuel bonds were issued primarily to finance and refinance improvements to the jet fuel storage and
distribution system at the Airport. The pledge of the facilities rent will be in effect until the maturity of the
Fuel bonds on January 1, 2047. This date may be extended in the event additional bonds (including
refunding bonds) with a later maturity are issued.
(9) Leases
Airport as Lessor
As a lessor, the Airport leases terminal space (except for regulated leases), non-terminal buildings, and
land to tenants under various operating leases, a majority of which are non-cancellable and terminate at
various dates as late as 2053. In total, the Airport recognized lease revenue of $86.0 million and interest
revenue of $13.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2023, related to these leases. Due to refinements in
the methodology for the calculation of the annual payment, $1.5 million of lease revenue attributable to
fiscal year 2021-22 was recorded in fiscal year 2022-23.
Certain provisions of the Airport’s leases provide for variable rental payments that are not included in the
measurement of the lease receivable. Certain rental agreements with concessionaires specify that rental
payments are to be based on a percentage of tenant sales, but no less than a fixed minimum amount.
Concession percentage rents in excess of minimum guarantees (to the extent applicable) for the leases
subject to GASB Statement No. 87 were approximately $10.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2023.
Additionally, several leases include terms that allow for an adjustment of the rents to market at determined
intervals and at least upon renewal. As a result, variable rent revenue is recognized for the rent increases
due to CPI adjustments. During fiscal year 2022-23, the Airport recognized $1.8 million in total variable
lease revenue.
Information about lease revenues and interest revenues recognized during the year ended June 30, 2023,
is presented below (in thousands):
Buildings
Land
Principal
$ 83,539
2,497
Interest
13,274
23
Total
96,813
2,520
Total Revenue $ 86,036 13,297 99,333
67
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Below is a schedule of future principal and interest payment receipts that are included in the measurement
of the lease receivable, for each of the five subsequent fiscal years and in five-year increments thereafter
as of June 30, 2023 (in thousands):
Fiscal Year(s) Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 114,523 26,454 140,977
2025 113,953 23,350 137,303
2026 112,953 20,175 133,128
2027 112,262 16,974 129,236
2028 114,649 13,709 128,358
2029 - 2033 306,703 30,988 337,691
2034 - 2038 39,255 4,745 44,000
2039 - 2043 9,265 3,235 12,500
2044 - 2048 10,445 2,055 12,500
2049 - 2053 11,713 725 12,438
$ 945,721 142,410 1,088,131
Regulated Leases
Certain regulated leases are subject to external laws, regulations or legal rulings and are exempted from
recognition under GASB Statement No. 87, subject to the conditions that:
(a) Lease rates cannot exceed a reasonable amount.
(b) Lease rates should be similar for similar situated lessees, and
(c) The lessor cannot deny potential lessees if facilities are available.
Such regulated leases at the Airport include:
(a) The Lease and Use Agreements with certain airlines regarding the use of terminal building and
equipment on an exclusive or preferential use basis, among other uses, which expired on June 30,
2023.
(b) Non-terminal aeronautical buildings and land leases. Based on the airlines’ operation needs, an
airline may lease terminal space such as office space, ticket counter space, baggage makeup
space, baggage claim space, and other operation spaces on a combination of exclusive,
preferential, and common use basis. The Commission provides holdrooms on a preferential or
common use basis to the airlines and adjusts the preferential assignment from time to time
pursuant to the Lease and Use Agreements. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, United
Airlines accounted for 46.7 percent of total enplaned passengers at the Airport, followed by Alaska
68
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Airlines (12.3%), Delta Air Lines (7.9%), and American Airlines (6.3%), with no other airlines
accounting for more than 5 percent of enplaned passengers. Non-terminal buildings and lands are
leased on an exclusive basis. The Airport has entered new Lease and Use Agreements that
became effective on July 1, 2023 and expire on June 30, 2033.
The payments under the Lease and Use Agreements are recalculated at the end of each fiscal year and
therefore are variable payments. Total inflow of resources for regulated leases during fiscal year ending
June 30, 2023, was $215.6 million, including approximately $47.3 million of fixed payments and $168.3
million of variable payments. The additional exclusive and preferential use payments are the actual billed
amount during fiscal year 2022-23, which was adjusted down $14.5 million during year-end true-up
process.
Below is a summary of the total number of regulated leases for fiscal year 2022-23, including which assets
are subject to preferential or exclusive use by counterparties:
AULA (a)
Preferential and exclusive rental
Exclusive rental only
Non-space rental, only common use
# of Leases
7
28
3
Subtotal - AULA 38
Other Regulated (b) 8
Tot al 46
Notes:
(a) Airline-airport use and lease agreements
(b) Includes cargo, fuel, fixed-base facility leases, hangar
leases, ground leases, and flight support services lease.
69
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Lease revenues and interest revenues recognized during the year ended June 30, 2023 for regulated
leases is presented below (in thousands):
Expected minimum payments (a) $ 45,277
Additional fixed payments (b) 2,024
Total fixed payments 47,301
Additional exclusive use payments (c) 127,086
Additional preferential use payments (d) 55,666
Year-end true-ups (14,465)
Total regulated lease payments $ 215,588
Notes:
(a) Doesn't include airline use and lease agreements, which are
recalculated annually and considered variable payments
(b) Includes additional rent above the expected minimum payments
after adjusted by CPI and reappraisals
(c) Includes AULA exclusive use rental revenues, other regulated
leases that were charged by airport's rates and charges rate, and
percentage fee revenues above MAG
(d) Includes AULA preferential use rental revenues
70
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Below is a schedule of expected future minimum payments under these agreements for each of the subsequent
five years and in five-year increments thereafter (in thousands):
Expected Minimum
Payments (a)
FY 2024 $ 19,286
FY 2025 18,092
FY 2026 5,462
FY 2027 1,644
FY 2028 1,644
FY 2029-2033 8,221
FY 2034-2038 8,221
FY 2039-2043 8,221
FY 2044-2048 6,166
Total $ 76,957
Note:
(a) Doesn't include airline use and lease agreements, which are
recalculated annually and considered variable payments
Airport as Lessee
As a lessee, the Airport had entered into one lease agreement for the land and building located at 837
Malcolm Rd, Burlingame, CA. The total lease asset and related accumulated amortization at June 30, 2023
is as follows (in thousands):
Lease Asset $ 671
Accumulated Amortization (417)
$ 254
A summary of change in the related lease liability during the year ended June 30, 2023, is as follows (in
thousands):
Amounts Due
7/1/2022 Additions Remeasurements Deductions 6/30/2023 Within One Year
Lease Liability $ 409 - - (139) 270 145
71
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
The future principal and interest payments as of June 30, 2023, are as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Year Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 145 2 147
2025 125 - 125
$ 270 2 272
(10) Conduit Debt
On February 26, 2019, the Airport issued San Francisco International Airport Special Facilities Lease
Revenue Bonds (SFO FUEL COMPANY LLC), Series 2019A (AMT) and Series 2019B (Federally Taxable)
(the “Fuel Bonds”), in an aggregate principal amount of $125.0 million to refund all of the then-outstanding
special facilities lease revenue bonds previously issued by the Commission for the benefit of SFO FUEL
COMPANY LLC (SFO Fuel), finance capital improvements to the jet fuel distribution and related facilities at
San Francisco International Airport, pay capitalized interest on a portion of the Series 2019A Bonds, make
a deposit to a reserve account for the Fuel Bonds, and pay costs of issuance. As of June 30, 2023, the
outstanding balance was $96.7 million. The 2019 Fuel Bonds have a final maturity of January 1, 2047.
SFO Fuel, a special purpose limited liability company formed by certain airlines operating at the Airport, is
required to pay facilities rent to the Airport pursuant to a lease agreement between the Commission and
SFO Fuel with respect to the on-Airport jet fuel distribution facilities in an amount equal to debt service
payments on the Fuel Bonds and any required bond reserve account deposits. The principal and interest
on the Fuel Bonds are paid solely from the facilities rent payable by SFO Fuel to the Airport. The lease
payments, and therefore the Fuel Bonds, are payable from charges imposed by SFO Fuel on air carriers
for into-plane fueling at the Airport and are not payable from or secured by the Net Revenues of the Airport.
The Airport assigned its right to receive the facilities rent to the Fuel Bonds trustee to pay and secure the
payment of the Fuel Bonds. Neither the Airport nor the City is obligated in any manner for the repayment of
the Fuel Bonds other than from the facilities rent received from SFO Fuel. The Fuel Bonds are therefore not
reported in the accompanying financial statements.
A summary of change in deferred inflows – capital asset during the year ending in June 30, 2023, is
presenting below (in thousands):
7/1/2022 * Additions Deductions June 30, 2023
Deferred Inflows - Capital Asset $ 106,617 - (4,352) 102,265
*Restated due to the implementation of GASB 91.
72
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(11) Subscription-Based Information Technology
The Airport frequently procures IT products and services through the City’s technology marketplace
arrangements, which use substantially similar contracts, and issues purchase orders to specify the details
of desired products or services. Some purchases that cover a period of multiple years are subject to the
provisions of GASB Statement No. 96. There is typically no variable payment. The implementation of
GASB Statement No. 96 resulted in recognition of $2.7 million in a right-to-use asset and a corresponding
subscription liability in fiscal year 2022-23.
The total subscription asset and related accumulated amortization at June 30, 2023, is as follows (in
thousands):
Subscription Asset $ 2,697
Accumulated Amortization (1,385)
$ 1,312
A summary of change in the related subscription liability during the year ended June 30, 2023, is as follows
(in thousands):
Amounts Due
7/1/2022 Additions Remeasurements Deductions 6/30/2023 Within One Year
Subscription Liability $ 2,697 - (1,805) 892 671
The future principal and interest payments as of June 30, 2023, are as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal
Year Principal Interest Total
2024 $ 671 23 694
2025 221 5 226
$ 892 28 920
(12) Employee Benefit Plans
(a)
San Francisco City and County Employee’s Retirement System Plan
The San Francisco City and County Employee’s Retirement System (Retirement System) administers a
cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit pension Plan (SFERS Plan). For purposes of measuring
the net pension liability, deferred outflows/inflows of resources related to pensions, pension expense,
information about the fiduciary net position of the SFERS Plan, and additions to/deductions from the
SFERS Plan’s fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by
the SFERS Plan. Contributions are recognized in the period in which they are due pursuant to legal
73
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
requirements. Benefit payments (including refunds of employee contributions) are recognized when
currently due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value.
Replacement Benefits Plan
The Replacement Benefits Plan (RBP) is a qualified excess benefit plan established in October 1989.
Internal Revenue Code Section 415(m) provides for excess benefit arrangements that legally permit
benefit payments above the Section 415 limits, provided that the payments are not paid from the
SFERS Plan. The RBP allows the City to pay SFERS retirees any portion of the Charter-mandated
retirement allowance that exceeds the annual Section 415(b) limit. The RBP plan does not meet the
criteria of a qualified trust under GASB Statement No. 73 because RBP assets are subject to the
claims of the employer’s general creditors under federal and state law in the event of insolvency.
GASB Statement No. 68 and 73 require that the SFERS Plan and RBP reported results must pertain to
liability and asset information within certain defined timeframes. For this report, the following
timeframes are used.
Valuation Date (VD) June 30, 2021 updated to June 30, 2022
Measurement Date (MD) June 30, 2022
Measurement Period (MP) July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022
SFERS Plan
The City is an employer of the plan with a proportionate share of 94.87% as of June 30, 2022
(measurement date), 0.23% increased from prior year. The Airport’s allocation percentage was
determined based on the Airport’s employer contributions divided by the City’s total employer
contributions for fiscal year 2021-22. The Airport’s net pension asset/liability, deferred outflows/inflows
of resources related to pensions, amortization of deferred outflows/inflows and pension expense is
based on the Airport’s allocated percentage. The Airport’s allocation of the City’s proportionate share
was 6.20% as of the measurement date.
Replacement Benefits Plan
The Airport’s allocation percentage was determined based on the Airport’s total pension liabilities
divided by the City’s total pension liabilities for fiscal year 2021-22. The Airport’s total pension liability,
deferred outflows/inflows of resources related to pensions, amortization of deferred outflows/inflows
and pension expense is based on the Airport’s allocated percentage. The Airport’s allocation of the
City’s proportionate share was 2.47% as of the measurement date.
SFERS Plan Description
The Plan provides basic service retirement, disability, and death benefits based on specified
percentages of defined final average monthly salary and provides annual cost-of-living adjustments
after retirement. The Plan also provides pension continuation benefits to qualified survivors. The San
Francisco City and County Charter and the Administrative Code are the authorities which establish and
amend the benefit provisions and employer obligations of the Plan. The Retirement System issues a
74
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary
information for the Plan. That report may be obtained on the Retirement System’s website or by writing
to the San Francisco City and County Employees’ Retirement System, 1145 Market Street, 5
th
Floor,
San Francisco, CA 94103 or by calling (415) 487-7000.
SFERS Benefits
The Retirement System provides service retirement, disability and death benefits based on specified
percentages of defined final average monthly salary and annual cost of living adjustments (COLA) after
retirement. Benefits and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the terms of
the Plan. The Retirement System pays benefits according to the category of employment and the type
of benefit coverage provided by the City and County. The four main categories of Plan members are:
Miscellaneous Non-Safety Members – staff, operational, supervisory, and all other eligible
employees who are not in special membership categories.
Sheriff’s Department and Miscellaneous Safety Members – sheriffs assuming office on and after
January 7, 2012, and undersheriffs, deputized personnel of the sheriff’s department, and
miscellaneous safety employees hired on and after January 7, 2012.
Firefighter Members – firefighters and other employees whose principal duties are in fire prevention
and suppression work or who occupy positions designated by law as firefighter member positions.
Police Members – police officers and other employees whose principal duties are in active law
enforcement or who occupy positions designated by law as police member positions.
The membership groups and the related service retirement benefits are included in the Notes to the Basic
Financial Statements of San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System.
All members are eligible to apply for a disability retirement benefit, regardless of age, when they have
10 or more years of credited service, and they sustain an injury or illness that prevents them from
performing their duties. Safety members are eligible to apply for an industrial disability retirement
benefit from their first day on the job if their disability is caused by an illness or injury that they receive
while performing their duties.
All retired members receive a benefit adjustment each July 1, which is the Basic COLA. The majority of
adjustments are determined by changes in CPI with increases capped at 2%. The Plan provides for a
Supplemental COLA in years when there are sufficient “excess” investment earnings in the Plan. The
maximum benefit adjustment each July 1 is 3.5% including the Basic COLA. Effective July 1, 2012,
voters approved changes in the criteria for payment of the Supplemental COLA benefit, so that
Supplemental COLAs would only be paid when the Plan is also fully funded on a market value of
assets basis. Certain provisions of this voter-approved proposition were challenged in the Courts. A
decision by the California Courts modified the interpretation of the proposition. Effective July 1, 2012,
members who retired before November 6, 1996 will receive a Supplemental COLA only when the Plan
is also fully funded on a market value of assets basis. However, the “full funding” requirement does not
apply to members who retired on or after November 6, 1996 and were hired before January 7, 2012.
For all members hired before January 7, 2012, all Supplemental COLAs paid to them in retirement
benefits will continue into the future even where an additional Supplemental COLA is not payable in
75
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
any given year. For members hired on and after January 7, 2012, a Supplemental COLA will only be
paid to retirees when the Plan is fully funded on a market value of asset basis and in addition for these
members, Supplemental COLAs will not be permanent adjustments to retirement benefits. That is, in
years when a Supplemental COLA is not paid, all previously paid Supplemental COLAs will expire.
Funding and Contribution Policy
SFERS Plan
Contributions are made by both the City and other participating employees. Employee contributions are
mandatory as required by the Charter. Employee contribution rates varied from 7.5% to 12.0% and
7.5% to 13.0%, as a percentage of gross covered salary in fiscal year 2022-23 and fiscal year 2021-22,
respectively. Most employee groups agreed through collective bargaining for employees to contribute
the full amount of the employee contributions on a pretax basis. The City is required to contribute at an
actuarially determined rate. Based on the July 1, 2021 actuarial report, the required employer
contribution rate for fiscal year 2022-23 range from 17.85% to 21.35%. Based on the July 1, 2020
actuarial report, the required employer contribution rate for fiscal year 2021-22 range from 19.91% to
24.41%.
Employer contributions and employee contributions made by the employer to the Plan are recognized
when due and the employer has made a formal commitment to provide the contributions. The City’s
proportionate share of employer contributions recognized by the Retirement System in fiscal year
ended June 30, 2022 (measurement year) was $729.6 million. The Airport’s allocation of employer
contributions for fiscal year 2021-22 was $47.4 million, and $52.6 million for fiscal year 2020-21.
At June 30, 2023, the Airport reported $39.6 million as deferred outflows of resources related to
contributions subsequent to the measurement date, which will be recognized as an adjustment to net
pension liability/(asset) in the reporting year ended June 30, 2024.
Replacement Benefits Plan
The RBP is and will remain unfunded and the rights of any participant and beneficiary are limited to
those specified in the RBP. The RBP constitutes an unsecured promise by the City to make benefit
payments in the future to the extent funded by the City. The City paid $4.5 million replacement benefits
in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 and Airport’s allocation portion for fiscal year FY2022-23 was
$277.4 thousands.
Pension Liabilities, Pension Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to
Pensions
SFERS Plan – As of June 30, 2023, the City reported net pension liability for its proportionate share of
the net pension liability of the Plan of $2.6 billion. The City’s net pension liability for the Plan is
measured as the proportionate share of the net pension liability. The net pension liability of the Plan is
measured as of June 30, 2022 (measurement date), and the total pension liability for the Plan used to
calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2021 rolled
forward to June 30, 2022 using standard update procedures. The City’s proportion of the net pension
liability for the Plan was based on a projection of the City’s long-term share of contributions to the
76
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
pension plan relative to the projected contributions of all participating employers, actuarially
determined.
Replacement Benefits Plan – As of June 30, 2023, the City reported total pension liability of $156
million. The measurement date for the RBP is June 30, 2022. City’s total pension liability for the RPB
measurements is based on the total pension liability as of the valuation date, June 30, 2021 rolled
forward to June 30, 2022 using standard update procedures.
As of June 30, 2023, the SFO’s proportionate share and net pension liability/ (net pension asset) of
each plan were as follows:
June 30, 2022 June 30, 2021
(Measurement Date) (Measurement Date)
SFO Share of Net SFO Share of Net
Proportionate Pension Liability Proportionate Pension Liability
Share (Asset) Share (Asset) Change
SFERS Plan 6.20% $ 158,341 6.50% (158,952) $ 317,293
Replacement Benefits Plan 2.47% 3,859 2.31% 5,081 (1,222)
Total $ 162,200 (153,871) $ 316,071
For the year ended June 30, 2023, the City’s recognized pension expense/(benefit) was $1.8 million
including amortization of deferred outflows/inflows related pension items. The Airport’s allocation of
pension expense/(benefit) including amortization of deferred outflows/inflows related pension items was
$(11.3) million. Pension expense/(benefit) increased from the prior year, largely due to the amortization
of deferrals. At June 30, 2023, the Airport’s reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred
inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources.
Schedule of Deferred Inflows and Outflows of Resources
Fiscal Year 2022-23
(in thousands)
SFERS Plan Replacement Benefits Plan
Deferred Deferred Deferred Deferred
Outflows of Inflows of Outflows of Inflows of
Resources Resources Resources Resources
Pension contributions subsequent to
measurement date $ 39,570
Difference between expected and actual
experience 14,453 509 488
Changes in assumptions 41,143 12,345 621 834
Net difference between projected and actual
earnings on pension plan investments 19,683
Change in employer's proportion 9,661 2,718 1,624
Total $ 104,827 34,746 1,130 2,946
77
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Amounts reported as deferred outflows, exclusive of contributions made after the measurement date,
and deferred inflows of resources will be amortized annually and recognized in pension expense as
follows (in thousands):
Replacement
SFERS Plan Benefits Plan
Year ended June 30:
2024 $ (8,460) (307)
2025 (8,967) (477)
2026 (21,308) (654)
2027 69,246 (378)
Total $ 30,511 (1,816)
At June 30, 2023, the SFO reported $39.6 million as deferred outflows of resources related to
contributions subsequent to the measurement date, which will be recognized as an adjustment to net
pension liability/(asset) in the reporting year ended June 30, 2024.
Actuarial Assumptions
A summary of the actuarial assumptions and methods used to calculate the Total Pension Liability for
both SFERS Plan and RBP as of June 30, 2022 (measurement year) is provided below, including any
assumptions that differ from those used in the July 1, 2021 actuarial valuation. Refer to the July 1, 2021
actuarial valuation report for a complete description of all other assumptions, which can be found on
the Retirement System’s website http://mysfers.org.
Key Actuarial Assumptions:
SFERS Plan
Valuation Date June 30, 2021 updated to June 30, 2022
Measurement Date June 30, 2022
Actuarial Cost Method Entry-Age Normal Cost
Expected Rate of Return 7.20% net of investment expenses
Municipal Bond Yield 2.16% as of June 30, 2021
3.54% as of June 30, 2022
Bond Buyer 20-Bond GO Index, June 24, 2021 and June 30, 2022
Inflation 2.50%
Projected salary increases 3.25% plus merit component based on employee classification and years of service
Discount Rate 7.40% as of June 30, 2021
7.20% as of June 30, 2022
Administrative Expenses 0.60% of payroll as of June 30, 2021
0.60% of payroll as of June 30, 2022
78
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
June 30, 2021 2.00 % 1.90 % 2.50 % 3.60 %
June 30, 2022 2.00 % 1.90 % 2.50 % 3.60 %
Changes of Assumptions SFERS Plan – For the measurement period ended June 30, 2022, the
discount rate was decreased from 7.40% to 7.20%. The municipal bond yield increased from 2.16% to
3.54%.
Key Actuarial Assumptions
Replacement Benefit Plan
Valuation Date June 30, 2021 updated to June 30, 2022
Measurement Date June 30, 2022
Actuarial Cost Method Entry-Age Normal Cost
Municipal Bond Yield 3.54% as of June 30, 2022
Bond Buyer 20-Bond GO Index, June 24, 2021 and June 30, 2022
Inflation 2.50%
Projected salary increases 3.25% plus merit component based on employee classification and years of service
Discount Rate 3.54% as of June 30, 2022
Administrative Expenses 0.60% of payroll as of June 30, 2022
Basic COLA:
Old
Miscellaneous
Old Police &
Fire
Old Police
& Fire
Charters
Old Police
& Fire
Charters
June 30, 2021
June 30, 2022
2.00 %
2.00 %
1.90 %
1.90 %
2.50 %
2.50 %
3.60 %
3.60 %
Changes of Assumptions RBP – For the measurement period ended June 30, 2022, the discount rate
and the municipal bond yield increased from 2.16% to 3.54%.
Mortality rates for health Miscellaneous members were based upon adjusted PubG-2010 Employee and
Retiree tables for non-annuitants and retirees, respectively. Mortality rates were then projected
generationally from the base year using the MP-2019 projection scale.
The actuarial assumptions used at the June 30, 2022 measurement date was based upon the result of
a demographic experience study for the period July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2019 and an economic
experience study as of July 1, 2021.
79
Old
Miscellaneous Old Police Old Police & Fire Old Police & Fire
and all New & Fire Pre Charters A8.595 Cha rters A8.559
Basic COLA:
Plans 7/1/75 and A8.596 and A8.585
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Discount Rate
SFERS Plan
The beginning and end of year measurements are based on different assumptions and contribution
methods that may result in different discount rates. The discount rate was 7.20% as of June 30, 2022
(measurement date).
The discount rate used to measure the Total Pension Liability as of June 30, 2022 was 7.20%. The
projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that plan member contributions
will continue to be made at the rates specified in the Charter. Employer contributions were assumed to
be made in accordance with the contribution policy in effect for July 1, 2021 actuarial valuation. That
policy includes contributions equal to the employer portion of the entry age normal costs for members
as of the valuation date, a payment for the expected administrative expenses, and an amortization
payment on the unfunded actuarial liability.
The amortization payment is based on closed periods that vary in length depending on the source.
Charter amendments prior to July 1, 2014 are amortized over 20 years. After July 1, 2014, any Charter
changes to active member benefits are amortized over 15 years and changes to inactive member
benefits, including Supplemental COLAs, are amortized over 5 years. The remaining unfunded
actuarial liability not attributable to Charter amendments as of July 1, 2013 is amortized over a 19-year
period commencing July 1, 2014. Experience gains and losses and assumption or method changes on
or after July 1, 2014 are amortized over 20 years. The full amortization payment for the 2015
assumption changes is phased in over a period of 5 years. For the July 1, 2016 valuation, the increase
in the unfunded actuarial liability attributable to the Supplemental COLAs granted on July 1, 2013 and
July 1, 2014 are amortized over 17-years and 5-years respectively. All amortization schedules are
established as a level percentage of payroll so payments increase 3.25% each year. The unfunded
actuarial liability is based on an actuarial value of assets that smooths investment gains and losses
over five years and a measurement of the actuarial liability that excludes the value of any future
Supplemental COLAs.
While the contributions and measure of actuarial liability in the funding valuation do not anticipate any
future Supplemental COLAs, the projected contributions for the determination of the discount rate
include the anticipated future amortization payments on future Supplemental COLAs for current
members when they are expected to be granted. For members who worked after November 6, 1996
and before Proposition C passed (Post 97 Retirees), a Supplemental COLA is granted if the actual
investment earnings during the year exceed the expected investment earnings on the actuarial value of
assets. For members who did not work after November 6, 1996 and before Proposition C passed, the
market value of assets must also exceed the actuarial liability at the beginning of the year for a
Supplemental COLA to be granted. When a Supplemental COLA is granted, the amount depends on
the amount of excess earnings and the basic COLA amount for each membership group. The large
majority of members receive a 1.50% Supplemental COLA when granted.
80
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Because the probability of a Supplemental COLA depends on the current funded level of the
Retirement System for certain members, an assumption was developed as of June 30, 2022 for the
probability and amount of Supplemental COLA for each future year. A full Supplemental COLA will be
paid to all retired members, and their beneficiaries, who were retired effective July 1, 2022. The table
below shows the net assumed Supplemental COLA for members with a 2.00% Basic COLA for sample
years.
Assumed Supplemental COLA
for Members with a 2.00% Basic COLA
Before 11/6/96 or
FYE 96 - Prop C After Prop C
2024 0.75% 0.70%
2025 0.75% 0.60%
2026 0.75% 0.60%
2027+ 0.75% 0.50%
The projection of benefit payments to current members for determining the discount rate includes the
payment of anticipated future Supplemental COLAs.
Based on these assumptions, the Retirement System’s fiduciary net position was projected to be
available to make projected future benefit payments for current members for all future years. Projected
benefit payments are discounted at the long-term expected return on assets of 7.20% to the extent the
fiduciary net position is available to make the payments and at the municipal bond rate of 3.54% to the
extent they are not available. The single equivalent rate used to determine the Total Pension Liability
as of June 30, 2022 is 7.20%.
The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was 7.20%. It was set by the
Retirement Board after consideration of both expected future returns and historical returns experienced
by the SFERS Retirement System. Expected future returns were determined by using a building-block
method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return were developed for each
major asset class. These ranges were combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by
weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage and by
adding expected inflation. Target allocation and best estimates of geometric long-term expected real
rates of return (net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) for each major asset class are
summarized in the following table.
81
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Long-Term
Target Expected Real
Asset Class Allocation Rate of Return
Global Equity 37.0% 4.8%
Treasuries 8.0% 0.6%
Liquid Credit 5.0% 3.5%
Private Credit 10.0% 5.8%
Private Equity 23.0% 7.9%
Real Assets 10.0% 4.7%
Hedge Funds/Absolute Return 10.0% 3.4%
Leverage -3.0% 0.6%
100.0%
Replacement Benefits Plan
The beginning and end of year measurements are based on different assumptions that result in
different discount rates. The discount rate was 3.54% as of June 30, 2022. This reflects the yield for a
20-year, tax-exempt general obligation municipal bond with an average rating of AA/Aa or higher. The
Municipal Bond Yields are the Bond Buyer 20-Year GO Index as of June 24, 2021 and June 30, 2022.
These are the rates used to determine the total pension liability as of June 30, 2022.
The inflation assumption of 2.50% compounded annually was used for projecting the annual IRC
Section 415(b) limitations. The actual IRC Section 415(b) limitations published by the IRS of $245 was
used for the 2022 measurement date.
The SFERS assumptions about Basic and Supplemental COLA previously discussed also apply to the
Replacement Benefits Plan, including the impact of the State Appeals Court determination that the full
funding requirement for payment of Supplemental COLA included in Proposition C was unconstitutional
and the impact is accounted for as a change in benefits.
On June 30, 2023, City’s membership in the RBP had a total of 327 active members and 160 retirees
and beneficiaries currently receiving benefits. The Airport has 7 active members and 2 retirees and
beneficiaries currently receiving benefits.
82
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Sensitivity of Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate
The following presents the Airport’s allocation of the employer’s proportionate share of the net pension
liability/(asset) for the SFERS Plan, calculated using the discount rate, as well as what the Airport’s
allocation of the employer’s proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated
using a discount rate that is 1% lower or 1% higher than the current rate (in thousands):
1% Decrease Share of Share of NPL/(NPA) 1% Increase Share of
Employer NPL/(NPA) @ 6.20% @ 7.20% NPL/(NPA)@ 8.20%
Airport $ 433,597 158,341 (68,574)
The following presents the Airport’s allocation of the employer’s proportionate share of the total pension
liability for the Replacement Benefits Plan, calculated using the discount rate, as well as what the
Airport’s allocation of the employer’s proportionate share of the total pension liability would be if it were
calculated using a discount rate that is 1% lower or 1% higher than the current rate (in thousands):
1% Decrease Measurement Date 1% Increase
Employer @ 2.54 @ 3.54% @ 4.54%
Airport $ 4,577 3,859 3,293
83
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(b)
Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB)
The Airport participates in a single-employer defined benefit other postemployment benefits plan (the
Plan). The Plan is maintained by the City and is administered through the City’s Health Service
System. It provides postemployment medical, dental and vision insurance benefits to eligible
employees, retired employees, surviving spouses, and domestic partners. Health benefit provisions are
established and may be amended through negotiations between the City and the respective bargaining
units. The City does not issue a separate report on its other postemployment benefit plan.
GASB Statement No. 75 requires that reported results must pertain to liability and asset information
within certain defined timeframes. For this report, the following timeframes are used.
Fiscal year 2023
Valuation Date (VD) June 30, 2022
Measurement Date (MD) June 30, 2022
Measurement Period (MP) July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022
The Airport’s proportionate share percentage of the Plan was determined based on its percentage of
citywide “pay-as-you-go” contributions for the year ended June 30, 2022. The Airport’s net OPEB
liability, deferred outflows/inflows of resources related to OPEB, amortization of deferred
outflows/inflows and OPEB expense is based on the Airport’s allocated percentage. The Airport’s
proportionate share of the City’s OPEB elements was 6.88% as of the measurement date.
Benefits
Permanent full-time and elected employees are eligible to retire and receive postretirement health
insurance benefits when they are eligible for retirement benefits from the City and County of San
Francisco’s Retirement System. The eligibility requirements are as follows:
Normal Retiremen
t
Miscellaneous
A
ge 50 with 20 years of credited service
1
A
ge 60 with 10 years of credited service
Safet
y
A
ge 50 with 5 years of credited service
Disabled Retiremen
t
2
A
ny age with 10 years of credited service
Terminated Vested 5 years of credited service at separation
1
Age 53 with 20 years of credited service, age 60 with 10 years of credited service, or age 65 for Miscellaneous members hired
on or after January 7, 2012 under Charter Section 8.603.
2
No service requirement for Safety members retiring under the industrial disability benefit or for surviving spouses / domestic
partners of those killed in the line of duty.
84
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Retiree healthcare benefits are administered by the San Francisco Health Service System and include
the following:
Medical: PPO – Blue Shield (self-insured) and UHC Medicare Advantage
(fully insured)
HMO – Kaiser (fully-insured) and Blue Shield (flex-funded) and Health Net
(flex-funded)
Dental: Delta Dental, DeltaCare USA, and UnitedHealthcare Dental
Vision: Vision benefits are provided under the medical insurance plans
and are administered by Vision Service Plan
Projections of the sharing of benefit related costs are based on an established pattern of practice.
Contributions
Benefits provided under the Plan are currently paid through “pay-as-you-go” funding. Additionally,
under the City Charter, active officers and employees of the City who commenced employment on or
after January 10, 2009, shall contribute to the Retiree Health Care Trust Fund (Trust Fund) a
percentage of compensation not to exceed 2% of pre-tax compensation. The City shall contribute 1%
of compensation for officers and employees who commenced employment on or after January 10,
2009 until the City’s GASB Actuary has determined that the City’s portion of the Trust Fund is fully
funded. At that time, the City’s 1% contribution shall cease, and officers and employees will each
contribute 50% of the maximum 2% of pre-tax compensation.
Starting July 1, 2016, active officers and employees of the City who commenced employment on or
before January 9, 2009, shall contribute 0.25% of pre-tax compensation into the Trust Fund. Beginning
on July 1st of each subsequent year, the active officers and employees of the City who commenced
employment on or before January 9, 2009, shall contribute an additional 0.25% of pre-tax
compensation up to a maximum of 1%. Starting July 1, 2016, the City shall contribute 0.25% of
compensation into the Trust Fund for each officer and employee who commenced employment on or
before January 9, 2009. Beginning on July 1st of each subsequent year, the City shall contribute an
additional 0.25% of compensation, up to a maximum of 1% for each officer and employee who
commenced employment on or before January 9, 2009. When the City’s actuary has determined that
the City’s portion of the Trust Fund is fully funded, the City’s 1% contribution shall cease, and officers
and employees will each contribute 50% of the maximum 1% of pre-tax compensation.
Additional or existing contribution requirements may be established or modified by amendment to the
City’s Charter.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023, the City’s funding was based on “pay-as-you-go” plus a
contribution of $45.2 million to the Retiree Healthcare Trust Fund. The “pay-as-you-go” portion paid by
the City was $215.4 million for a total contribution of $260.6 million for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2023. The Airport’s proportionate share of the City’s contributions for fiscal year 2022-23 was $17.9
million.
85
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
OPEB Liabilities, OPEB Expenses and Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources Related to OPEB
As of June 30, 2023, the City reported net OPEB liabilities related to the Plan of $3.7 billion. The
Airport’s proportionate share of the City’s net OPEB liability as of June 30, 2023 was $257.8 million.
For the year ended June 30, 2023, the City’s recognized OPEB expense was $257.0 million.
Amortization of the City’s deferred outflows and inflows is included as a component of OPEB expense.
The Airport’s proportionate share of the City’s OPEB expense/(income) was $21.4 million.
As of June 30, 2023, the Airport reported its proportionate share of the City’s deferred outflows and
inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources (in thousands):
Deferred Deferred
Outflows of Inflows of
Resources Resources
Contributions subsequent to measurement date $ 17,934
Differences between expected and actual experience 5,723
Changes in assumptions 11,005
Net difference between projected and actual earnings on
plan investments 4,149
Change in proportion 120
42,915
8,033
Total $ 38,931 50,948
Amounts reported as deferred outflows, exclusive of contributions made after the measurement date,
and deferred inflows of resources will be amortized annually and recognized in OPEB expense as
follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Year:
2024 $ (7,610)
2025 (7,542)
2026 (4,953)
2027 (5,645)
Thereafter (4,201)
Total $ (29,951)
At June 30, 2023, the SFO reported $17.9 million as deferred outflows of resources related to
contributions subsequent to the measurement date, which will be recognized as an adjustment to net
OPEB liability/(asset) in the reporting year ending June 30, 2024.
86
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Actuarial Assumptions
A summary of the actuarial assumptions and methods used to calculate the Total OPEB Liability as of
June 30, 2022 (measurement date) is provided below:
Key actuarial assumptions:
Valuation Date June 30, 2022
Measurement Date June 30, 2022
Actuarial Cost Method
The Entry Age Actuarial Cost Method is used to measure the
Plan's Total OPEB Liability
Healthcare Cost Trend Rates Pre-Medicare trend starts at 7.74% trending down to ultimate
rate of 3.93% in 2076
Medicare trend starts at 7.74% trending down to ultimate rate
of 3.94% in 2076
10-County average trend starts at 5.00% trending down to
ultimate rate of 3.94% in 2076
Vision and expenses trend remains a flat 3.00% for all years
Expected Rate of Return on Plan Assets 7.00%
Salary Increase Rate Wage Inflation Component: 3.25%
Additional Merit Component (dependent on years of service):
Police: 0.50% - 7.50%
Fire: 0.50% - 14.00%
Muni Drivers: 0.00% - 16.00%
Craft: 0.50% - 3.75%
Misc: 0.30% - 5.50%
Inflation Rate Wage Inflation: 3.25% compounded annually
Consumer Price Inflation: 2.50% compounded annually
Mortality Tables Base mortality tables are developed by multiplying a published
table by an adjustment factor developed in SFERS experience
study for the period ending June 30, 2019.
87

AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Adjustment Factor
Non-Annuitants:
Published Table Male Female
Miscellaneous PubG-2010 Employee 0.834 0.866
Safety PubS-2010 Employee 1.011 0.979
Adjustment Factor
Healthy Retirees:
Published Table Male Female
Miscellaneous PubG-2010 Employee 1.031 0.977
Safety PubS-2010 Employee 0.947 1.044
Adjustment Factor
Disabled Retirees:
Published Table Male Female
Miscellaneous PubG-2010 Employee 1.045 1.003
Safety PubS-2010 Employee 0.916 0.995
Adjustment Factor
Beneficiaries:
Published Table Male Female
Miscellaneous PubG-2010 Employee 1.031 0.977
Safety PubG-2010 Employee 1.031 0.977
Change in Assumption – For the measurement date June 30, 2022, the healthcare cost trend rates
change as follow:
Healthcare Cost Trend June 30, 2022 (MD) June 30, 2021 (MD)
PreMedicare
starts at 7.74% trending down to
ultimate rate of 3.93% in 2076
starts at 6.74% trending down to
ultimate rate of 4.04% in 2075
Medicare
starts at 7.74% trending down to
ultimate rate of 3.94% in 2076
starts at 7.24% trending down to
ultimate rate of 4.04% in 2075
10County average
starts at 5.00% trending down to
ultimate rate of 3.94% in 2076
starts at 5.50% trending down to
ultimate rate of 4.04% in 2075
The mortality rates in the base tables are projected generationally from the base year using the MP-
2019 projection scale.
88
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Sensitivity of Liabilities to Changes in the Healthcare Cost Trend Rate and Discount Rate
The following presents the Airport’s proportionate share of the City’s net OPEB liability calculated using
the healthcare cost trend rate, as well as what the Airport’s allocation of the City’s net OPEB liability
would be if it were calculated using a healthcare cost trend rate that is 1% lower or 1% higher than the
current rate (in thousands):
1% Decrease Healthcare Trend 1% Increase
$ 220,515 257,767 303,972
89
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
Discount Rate
The discount rate used to measure the Total OPEB Liability as of June 30, 2022 was 7.0%. Based on
the assumption that plan member contributions will continue to be made at the rates specified in the
Charter, it was determined that the Plan’s projected fiduciary net position will be greater than or equal
to the benefit payments projected for each future period. As such, the long-term expected rate of return
on plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total
OPEB liability.
The long-term expected rate of return on OPEB plan investments was 7.0% based on expected future
returns and historical returns experienced by the Trust Fund. Expected future returns were determined
based on 10-year and 20-year capital market assumptions for the Trust Fund’s asset allocation. Target
allocation for each major asset class and best estimates of geometric real rates of return are
summarized in the following table:
Long-term
Expected Real
Asset Class Target Allocation
Rate of Return
Equities
U.S. Large Cap 28.0% 6.8%
U.S. Small Cap 3.0% 7.4%
Developed Market Equity (non-U.S.) 15.0% 7.5%
Emerging Market Equity 13.0% 8.4%
Credit
Bank Loans 3.0% 4.0%
High Yield Bonds 3.0% 4.4%
Emerging Market Bonds 3.0% 4.2%
Rate Securities
Investment Grade Bonds 9.0% 2.4%
Long-term Government Bonds 4.0% 2.8%
Short-term Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 4.0% 1.9%
Private Markets
Private Equity 5.0% 10.0%
Core Private Real Estate 5.0% 6.1%
Risk Mitigating Strategies
Global Macro 5.0% 5.0%
Total 100.0%
90
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
The following presents the Airport’s proportionate share of the City’s net OPEB liability calculated using
the discount rate, as well as what the Airport’s proportionate share of the City’s net OPEB liability would
be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1.0% lower or 1.0% higher than the current rate (in
thousands):
1% Decrease
6.0%
Discount Rate
7.0%
1% Increase
8.0%
$ 300,091 257,767 223,043
City issues a publicly available financial report that includes the complete note disclosures and required
supplementary information related to the City’s postemployment health care obligations. The report may
be obtained by writing to the City and County of San Francisco, Office of the Controller, 1 Dr. Carlton B.
Goodlett Place, Room 316, San Francisco, California 94102, or by calling (415) 554-7500.
(13) Related-Party Transactions
The Airport receives services from various other City departments that are categorized in the various
operating expense line items in the statement of revenues, expenses, and changes in net position. The cost
of all services provided to the Airport through the City’s work order system totaled approximately $186.4
million. These services included $56.9 million in utilities provided to tenants (see note 2m) and the Airport.
Included in personnel operating expenses were approximately $97.2 million related to police and fire
services and $5.5 million in worker’s compensation claims. The remaining expenses were categorized as
Repair and Maintenance or capitalized with construction projects.
The Lease and Use Agreement with the airlines provides for continuing annual service payments to the
City equal to 15.0% of concession revenues (net of certain adjustments), but not less than $5.0 million per
fiscal year. The annual service payments to the City were $48.7 million in fiscal year 2022-23. The annual
service payments are reported as transfers in the statement of revenues, expenses, and changes in net
position.
91
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(14) Passenger Facility Charges
As of June 30, 2023, the FAA has approved several Airport applications to collect and use PFCs (from PFC
#2 to PFC #9) in a total cumulative collection amount of $2.3 billion and the cumulative use amount of $2.3
billion, with a final charge expiration date estimated to be December 1, 2030. During the fiscal years ended
from June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2023, the following changes occurred to the Airport’s PFC collection
authorizations.
In October 2013, the FAA approved the Airport’s fifth PFC application (PFC #5) for $610.5 million to pay for
debt service related costs associated with the reconstruction and reopening of Terminal 2 and Boarding
Area D. The earliest charge effective date was January 1, 2017 and was based upon the estimated charge
expiration date of PFC #3. The FAA estimated the charge expiration date for PFC #5 to be June 1, 2023. In
November 2014, the FAA approved an amendment to PFC #5 that increased the impose and use authority
by $131.2 million from $610.5 million to $741.7 million. The estimated expiration date for PFC #5 was
changed from June 1, 2023 to October 1, 2024. The Airport worked with the FAA to change the expiration
date for PFC #3 and the charge effective date for PFC #5 from January 1, 2017 to November 1, 2013,
because PFC #3 was fully collected earlier than originally anticipated due to increased passenger levels.
In June 2015, the FAA approved the Airport’s sixth PFC application (PFC #6) for $141.1 million to pay for
debt service related to the Runway Safety Area Program and the installation of ten passenger boarding
bridges at Boarding Area E. The FAA estimates the charge expiration date for PFC #6 to be March 1, 2026.
In May 2017, the FAA approved the Airport’s seventh PFC application (PFC #7) for $319.7 million to pay
for debt service associated with the AirTrain Extension and Improvements Project at the Airport. FAA
estimates the charge expiration date for PFC #7 to be February 1, 2030.
In February 2018, the FAA approved the Airport’s amendment to PFC #6 for an additional $76.0 million of
impose and use authority for a new total PFC #6 authority of $217.1 million.
In October 2018, the FAA approved the Airport’s eighth PFC application (PFC #8), which combined PFC
#6, as amended, and PFC #7, for a new combined total of $536.8 million of impose and use authority. The
estimated charge expiration date is March 1, 2029. PFC #6 and PFC #7 were closed, and the projects and
collections in those applications were transferred to PFC #8.
In October 2019, the FAA accepted the closeout documents, as amended, and closed PFC #3. This
application was authorized to impose and use $609.1 million of PFC revenue on the Boarding Areas A and
G and International Terminal Building Projects. The Commission certified that all collections were identified
as received and expended on the approved projects, in accordance with the Acknowledgement Letter and
any subsequent amendments to the Acknowledgement Letter.
In January 2021, the FAA approved the Airport’s ninth PFC application (PFC #9) with a total impose and
use authority of $208.6 million. The estimated charge expiration date is December 1, 2030. The PFC
revenues will be used to pay principal and interest on bonds issued for certain eligible costs associated
with the Design and Construction of Interim Boarding Area B at the Airport.
92
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
PFC collections and related interest earned (loss) for the year ended June 30, 2023, are as follows (in
thousands):
2023
Amount collected $ 92,341
Interest earned (loss) 7,075
Total $
99,416
Interest earned (loss) on PFC revenues is included in investment income in the accompanying financial
statements.
(15) Customer Facility Charges
A Customer Facility Charge (CFC) is a user fee imposed on rental car users. There are no federal
regulations that govern the collection of CFCs, so CFC collection is regulated by each state.
On March 1, 2022, the Airport Commission adopted Resolution No. 22-0031. This resolution allowed for the
implementation of a CFC at a rate of $10.0 per rental car transaction. The CFC was imposed by the
Commission in accordance with Sections 50474.21 and 50474.3 of the California Government Code, as
they may be amended or supplemented. The Commission started to collect CFCs on July 1, 2022.
CFC collections and related interest earned (loss) for the year ended June 30, 2023, are as follows (in
thousands):
2023
Amount collected
Interest earned (loss)
$ 11,441
(204)
Total $ 11,237
Interest earned (loss) on CFC revenues is included in investment income in the accompanying financial
statements.
93
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(16) Commitments, Litigation, and Contingencies
(a)
Commitments
Purchase commitments for construction, material, and services as of June 30, 2023, are as follows (in
thousands):
Construction
Operating
Total
$ 40,615
47,693
$ 88,308
The Airport’s Noise Insulation Program was implemented to mitigate the aircraft noise impact in the
surrounding communities. This involved execution of a Memorandum of Understanding in 1992 with
neighboring communities to insulate eligible properties and acquire easements for noise, vibration, and
other effects resulting from aircraft operations at the Airport, and implementation of a supplemental
program in 2000 to complete the work. This program was managed by the local communities with
Airport funds (using bond proceeds, operating and other internally generated funds), as well as federal
grants.
In fiscal year 2007-08, these components of the program were finalized, and a new phase was started,
with the Airport managing all new noise insulation work directly. In fiscal year 2022-23, the Airport
disbursed approximately $2.4 million in the new phase of the program ($1.4 million in federal grants
and $1.0 million in Airport funds). As of June 30, 2023, the cumulative disbursements of Airport funds
under this program were approximately $130.0 million.
(b)
Security Deposits
Each Signatory Airline is required to post security with the Commission to guarantee its performance
and payment. Such security generally consists of a surety bond or a letter of credit in an amount equal
to two months of terminal area rentals, landing fees, and usage fees. Other forms of security deposits
acceptable to the Commission, such as cash deposits, have on occasion been accepted in very limited
amounts and circumstances, such as when an airline bankruptcy occurs or where other forms of
security deposits are temporarily unavailable. Airlines operating at the Airport pursuant to 30-day
permits are required to post security bonds or letters of credit in an amount equal to six months of its
estimated rentals and fees under such agreements.
(c)
Litigation
The Airport is a defendant in various legal actions and claims that arise during the normal course of
business. Insurance policies cover certain liabilities and defense costs. Only those potential liabilities
not covered by insurance are included in the financial statements, and they have been estimated and
reported in conformity with GAAP.
94
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(d)
Risk Management
Under the 1991 Master Bond Resolution, the Airport is required to procure or provide and maintain
insurance, or to self-insure, against such risks as are usually insured by other major airports in
amounts adequate for the risk insured against, as determined by the Airport. The Airport is not required
to nor does it carry insurance or self-insure against any risks due to land movement or seismic activity.
The Airport has an ongoing loss prevention program, a safety officer, property loss control, and
ongoing employee training programs. The Airport has instituted an Enterprise Risk Management
Program by implementing a comprehensive risk identification, assessment, and treatment protocol to
address key risks that may adversely affect the Airport’s ability to meet its business goals and
objectives. The Airport carries aviation liability insurance coverage of $1.0 billion with $250.0 million in
War Perils Liability, subject to a deductible of $10,000 per occurrence. Immediately following the events
of September 11, 2001, insurers canceled the coverage for war, terrorism, and hijacking for all airports,
including the Airport. A number of insurers now provide this coverage through the Federal Government
Terrorism Risk Insurance Act. However, the scope of the coverage is limited and the premiums are
high. Due to these factors, the Commission, in consultation with the City’s Director of Risk
Management, has elected not to secure such coverage but to purchase War Perils Liability Coverage
as part of its aviation liability program.
The Airport also carries commercial property insurance coverage for full replacement value on all
facilities at the Airport owned by the Airport, subject to a limit of $1.0 billion per occurrence subject to a
deductible of $500,000 per occurrence. This policy includes flood coverage up to a $10.0 million sub-
limit. The Airport also carries business interruption and extra expenses insurance up to a $100.0 million
pooled sub-limit.
Additionally, tenants and contractors on all contracts are required to carry commercial general and
automobile liability insurance in various amounts, naming the Airport as additional insured. The Airport
is self-insured as part of the City’s workers’ compensation program. From current revenues, the Airport
pays losses from workers’ compensation claims of Airport employees, the deductible portion of insured
losses, and losses from other uninsured risks. The Airport carries public officials and employment
practices liability coverage of $5.0 million, subject to a deductible of $100,000 per occurrence for Public
Officials’ and Public Entity Liability matters, and $250,000 per occurrence for Employment Practices
Liability matters. The Airport also carries insurance for excess auto, public employee dishonesty, fine
arts, cyber liability, and watercraft liability for Airport fire and rescue vessels, and target range liability
for the San Francisco Police Department’s firearms range located at the Airport.
95
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
The estimated claims payable are actuarially determined as part of the City’s self-insurance program.
Changes in the reported amount resulted from the following activity (in thousands):
Balance as of June 30, 2022 $ 2,158
Claim payments (22)
Claims and changes in estimates 2,136
Balance as of June 30, 2023 $ 4,272
The Airport is self-insured as part of the City’s program for workers’ compensation. All self-insurance
claims are processed by the City. Liability and risk are retained by the Airport. Accrued workers’
compensation includes provisions for claims reported and claims incurred but not reported. This
accrued workers’ compensation liability is actuarially determined as part of the City’s program and is as
follows (in thousands):
Balance as of June 30, 2022
Claim payments
Claims and changes in estimates
$ 12,093
(5,455)
5,929
Balance as of June 30, 2023 $ 12,567
(e)
Grants
Grants that the Airport receives are subject to audit and final acceptance by the granting agency.
Current and prior year costs of such grants are subject to adjustment upon audit.
(f)
Financial Guarantees
The Airport participates in the City and County of San Francisco’s contractor development program,
previously referred to as the surety bond program, which provides training, support and City-funded
surety bond guaranties for local business enterprise (LBE) contractors who want to bid on construction
contracts for City departments (including the Airport), but cannot qualify for the required surety bonds
on their own. If program parameters are met, the Airport may guarantee the lesser of $750,000 or 40%
of the face amount of the surety bond, which would enable the LBE contractor to bid on Airport
construction work. There were no outstanding Airport guaranties under the program as of June 30,
2023.
96
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(g)
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Airport leases facilities to the airlines pursuant to the Lease and Use Agreement (see note 2i) and
to other businesses to operate concessions at the Airport. For fiscal year ended June 30, 2023,
revenues realized from the following source exceeded 5.0% of the Airport’s total operating revenues:
United Airlines 26.2 %
(h)
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)
For its aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicles and fire suppression operating systems, the Airport uses
Aqueous Film Forming Foam that contains Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), as required by
the FAA. PFAS are a group of more than 3,000 synthetic chemicals. The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) determined that, due to the widespread use and persistence in the
environment of PFAS, most people in the United States have been exposed to PFAS. The EPA also
found evidence that continued exposure to certain PFAS above specified levels may lead to adverse
health effects.
On March 20, 2019, the California State Water Resources Control Board (the “State Board”) issued an
order pursuant to California Water Code Section 13267, for the Determination of the Presence of PFAS
to all airports in California (the “Order”), including the Airport. The Order identifies the Airport as a
facility that accepted, stored, or used materials that may contain PFAS. The Order requires the Airport
to test soil, sediment, and groundwater for 23 types of PFAS. The Airport has completed the sampling
required under this Order, which identified the presence of PFAS in soil, sediment, and groundwater at
several locations at the Airport.
In March 2021, the State Board issued the Investigative Orders to Refineries and Bulk Fuel Terminals,
which ordered certain facilities, including two facilities located at the Airport, to conduct a one-time
sampling effort to determine whether soil, groundwater, surface water, and influent/effluent wastewater
were impacted by PFAS. The Airport completed the required testing for these two facilities and
submitted the final reports to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (the
Regional Board) in February and April 2023. The Airport anticipates that additional orders will be issued
requiring further testing and/or delineation of the presence of PFAS at the Airport.
The State Board and the Regional Board have not yet established cleanup standards for PFAS or
otherwise indicated what actions will be required for PFAS found in soil, sediment, and groundwater
exceeding the levels they specify. As of June 30, 2023, it is uncertain whether and to what extent the
levels of PFAS discovered at the Airport will trigger a remediation obligation. It is possible that the
ultimate costs of remediation and third-party liability for PFAS could be extensive.
97
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Financial Statements
Year ended June 30, 2023
(17) Subsequent Events
A new ten-year 2023 Lease and Use Agreement became effective on July 1, 2023 and is set to expire on
June 30, 2033.
On November 15, 2023, the Airport issued $794.3 million of its Series 2023C and Series 2023D Bonds, for
the purpose of refunding $497.8 million in outstanding commercial paper notes, refunding $241.8 million in
outstanding Series 2013A bonds, funding deposits to a debt service reserve account, and paying costs of
issuance. The financial statements reflected the refunded amounts as noncurrent liabilities. Moody’s and
Fitch assigned credit ratings of “A1” and “A+” to these bonds.
98
Crowe LLP
Independent Member Crowe
Global
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND
ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
The Honorable Mayor and Board of Supervisors
City and County of San Francisco
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the Airport Commission,
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International Airport (the “Airport”), an enterprise fund of
the City and County of San Francisco (the “City”) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2023, and the
related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Airport’s financial statements, and
have issued our report thereon dated December 22, 2023. As discussed in Note 1, the financial statements
present only the Airport and do not purport to, and do not, present fairly the financial position of the City,
the changes in its financial position, or where applicable, its cash flows in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the Airport’s internal control
over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Airport’s internal control. Accordingly, we do
not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Airport’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management
or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct,
misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in
internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity’s
financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant
deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a
material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this
section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material
weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any
deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses
or significant deficiencies may exist that have not been identified.
99
Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Airport’s financial statements are free from
material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the
financial statements. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an
objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed
no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing
Standards.
Purpose of this Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance
and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal
control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly,
this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.
Crowe LLP
Costa Mesa, California
December 22, 2023
100
Crowe LLP
Independent Member Crowe
Global
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO
THE PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE PROGRAM; REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
COMPLIANCE; AND REPORT ON THE SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES OF
PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES
The Honorable Mayor and Board of Supervisors
City and County of San Francisco
Report on Compliance of Passenger Facility Charges
Opinion on Passenger Facility Charge Program
We have audited the Airport Commission, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International
Airport (the “Airport”) compliance with the types of compliance requirements identified as subject to audit in
the Passenger Facility Charge Audit Guide for Public Agencies, issued by the Federal Aviation
Administration (“Guide”), that could have a direct and material effect on its passenger facility charge
program for the year ended June 30, 2023.
In our opinion, the Airport complied, in all material respects, with the compliance requirements referred to
above that could have a direct and material effect on its passenger facility charge program for the year
ended June 30, 2023.
Basis for Opinion on Passenger Facility Charge Program
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAS); the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government
Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (Government Auditing
Standards); and the audit requirements of the Guide. Our responsibilities under those standards and the
Guide are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our
report.
We are required to be independent of the Airport and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in
accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we
have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for the
passenger facility charge program. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the Airport’s
compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above.
Responsibilities of Management for Compliance
Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to above and for the design,
implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of
laws, statutes, regulations, rules and provisions of contracts or grant agreements applicable to the Airport’s
passenger facility charge program.
101
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the
compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion
on the Airport’s compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is
not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS,
Government Auditing Standards, and the Guide will always detect material noncompliance when it exists.
The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting from
error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of
internal control. Noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above is considered material,
if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would influence the judgment made
by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the Airport’s compliance with the requirements of
the passenger facility charge program as a whole.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards, and the Guide, we:
exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
identify and assess the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error, and design
and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the Airport’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred
to above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
obtain an understanding of the Airport’s internal control over compliance relevant to the audit in
order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report
on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Guide, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Airport’s internal control over compliance.
Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the
planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal
control over compliance that we identified during the audit.
Report on Internal Control Over Compliance
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over
compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a
federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency,
or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility
that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be
prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over
compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type
of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal
control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the Auditor’s
Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies
in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal
control over compliance. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in
internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However,
material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that were not
identified.
Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control
over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing
of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the Guide.
Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
102
Report on Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures of Passenger Facility Charges
We have audited the financial statements of the Airport as of and for the year ended June 30, 2023, and
the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Airport’s financial statements.
We issued our report thereon dated December 22, 2023, which contained an unmodified opinion on those
financial statements. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial
statements that collectively comprise the financial statements. The accompanying schedule of revenues
and expenditures of passenger facility charges is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required
by the Guide and is not a required part of the financial statements. Such information is the responsibility
of management and, except for that portion marked "unaudited," was derived from and relates directly to
the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements. That information
has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain
additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying
accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements
themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in
the United States of America. In our opinion, schedule of revenues and expenditures of passenger facility
charges is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements as a whole. The
information marked "unaudited" has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of
the financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it.
Crowe LLP
Costa Mesa, California
December 22, 2023
103
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Schedule of Passenger Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures
Year ended June 30, 2023
(In thousands)
Revenues over
Passenger
(under)
Facility
Expenditures expenditures
Charge
Interest Total on approved on approved
revenues
earned revenues projects project
Program to date as of June 30, 2022 (Unaudited)
$ 1,572,417 35,931 1,608,348 (1,123,240) $ 485,108
Fiscal year 2022 – 23 transactions:
Reversal passenger facility charges accrual (8,394) - (8,394) - (8,394)
Quarter ended September 30, 2022 22,039 1,551 23,590 - 23,590
Quarter ended December 31, 2022
17,294 2,245 19,539 - 19,539
Quarter ended March 31, 2023
20,557 3,136 23,693 - 23,693
Quarter ended June 30, 2023
24,614 4,122 28,736 - 28,736
Unrealized loss on investments
- (3,979) (3,979) - (3,979)
Passenger facility charges accrual
16,231 - 16,231 - 16,231
Total fiscal year 2022 – 23 transactions 92,341 7,075 99,416 - 99,416
Program to date as of June 30, 2023 (Unaudited)
$
1,664,758 43,006 1,707,764 (1,123,240) $ 584,524
See accompanying independent auditor’s report and notes to schedule of passenger facility charge revenues and expenditures.
104
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Schedule of Passenger Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures
Year ended June 30, 2023
(1)
General
The accompanying schedule of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) revenues and expenditures includes
activities related to applications 02-02-C-00-SFO, 03-03-C-01-SFO, 11-05-C-01-SFO, 18-08-C-00-SFO
and 21-09-C-00-SFO of the PFC program of the Airport Commission, City and County of San Francisco,
San Francisco International Airport (the Airport). The level of PFCs authorized, charge effective dates,
and approved collection amounts of the Airport’s PFC program are as follows:
Amounts approved for
Level of PFCs Charge effective date
collection
Application number authorized for collection
(in thousands)
02-02-C-00-SFO
$
4.50
October 1, 2001 $ 224,035
03-03-C-01-SFO 4.50
November 1, 2005 609,108
11-05-C-01-SFO 4.50
November 1, 2013 741,745
18-08-C-00-SFO 4.50
October 1, 2024 536,799
21-09-C-00-SFO 4.50
March 1, 2029 208,629
Total $ 2,320,316
(2)
Basis of Accounting – Schedule of Passenger Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures
The accompanying Schedule of Passenger Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures (the Schedule)
has been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting which is described in note 2a of the Airport’s basic
financial statements.
105
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
SCHEDULE OF PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
Year ended June 30, 2023
SUMMARY OF AUDITOR’S RESULTS
Financial Statements
Type of report the auditor issued on whether
the financial statements audited were prepared
in accordance with GAAP: Unmodified
Internal control over financial reporting:
Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No
Significant deficiency(ies) identified? Yes X None reported
Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? Yes X No
Passenger Facility Charge Audit Guide for Public Agencies
Internal control over major federal programs:
Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No
Significant deficiencies identified not
considered to be material weaknesses? Yes X None reported
Type of auditor’s report issued on compliance with the
Passenger Facility Charge Audit Guide for Public Agencies: Unmodified
Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be
reported in accordance with the Passenger Facility Charge
Audit Guide for Public Agencies? Yes X No
106
Crowe LLP
Independent Member Crowe
Global
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO
THE CUSTOMER FACILITY CHARGE PROGRAM; REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
COMPLIANCE; AND REPORT ON THE SCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES OF
CUSTOMER FACILITY CHARGES
The Honorable Mayor and Board of Supervisors
City and County of San Francisco
Report on Compliance of Customer Facility Charges
Opinion on Customer Facility Charge Program
We have audited the Airport Commission, City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco International
Airport (the “Airport”) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the California Civil
Code Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 1939.01) to Title 5 of Part 4 of Division 3, and California
Government Code Section 50474.1 through Section 50474.3 (“CFC Code”), that could have a direct and
material effect on its customer facility charge program for the year ended June 30, 2023.
In our opinion, the Airport complied, in all material respects, with the compliance requirements referred to
above that could have a direct and material effect on its customer facility charge program for the year ended
June 30, 2023.
Basis for Opinion on Customer Facility Charge Program
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAS); the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government
Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (Government Auditing
Standards); and the audit requirements of the Guide. Our responsibilities under those standards and the
Guide are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our
report.
We are required to be independent of the Airport and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in
accordance with relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we
have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for the customer
facility charge program. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the Airport’s compliance with
the compliance requirements referred to above.
Responsibilities of Management for Compliance
Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to above and for the design,
implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of
laws, statutes, regulations, rules and provisions of contracts or agreements applicable to the Airport’s
customer facility charge program.
107
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the
compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion
on the Airport’s compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is
not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS,
Government Auditing Standards, and the CFC Code will always detect material noncompliance when it
exists. The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting
from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the
override of internal control. Noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above is
considered material, if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would
influence the judgment made by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the Airport’s
compliance with the requirements of the customer facility charge program as a whole.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards, and the CFC Code, we:
exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit.
identify and assess the risks of material noncompliance, whether due to fraud or error, and design
and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the Airport’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred
to above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
obtain an understanding of the Airport’s internal control over compliance relevant to the audit in
order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report
on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Guide, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Airport’s internal control over compliance.
Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the
planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal
control over compliance that we identified during the audit.
Report on Internal Control Over Compliance
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over
compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a
federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency,
or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility
that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be
prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over
compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type
of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal
control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the Auditor’s
Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies
in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal
control over compliance. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in
internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However,
material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that were not
identified.
Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control
over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing
of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the CFC
Code. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
108
Report on Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures of Customer Facility Charges
We have audited the financial statements of the Airport as of and for the year ended June 30, 2023, and
the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Airport’s financial statements.
We issued our report thereon dated December 22, 2023, which contained an unmodified opinion on those
financial statements. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial
statements that collectively comprise the financial statements. The accompanying schedule of revenues
and expenditures of customer facility charges is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required
by the CFC Code and is not a required part of the financial statements. Such information is the
responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and
other records used to prepare the financial statements. That information has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including
comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used
to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional
procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In
our opinion, schedule of revenues and expenditures of customer facility charges is fairly stated in all
material respects in relation to the financial statements as a whole.
Crowe LLP
Costa Mesa, California
December 22, 2023
109
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Schedule of Customer Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures
Year ended June 30, 2023
(In thousands)
Revenues: 2023
Customer facility charges $ 11,441
Investment income (loss) (204)
Total revenues 11,237
Expenditures:
Total expenditures -
Expenditures over revenues $ (11,237)
See accompanying independent auditor's report and notes to schedule of customer facility
charge revenues and expenditures.
110
AIRPORT COMMISSION
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
Notes to Schedule of Customer Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures
Year ended June 30, 2023
(1)
General
California Government Code Section 50474.21 and Section 50474.3 permit an airport sponsor to require
rental car companies to collect from a renter a Customer Facility Charge (CFC) to finance, design, and
construct consolidated airport rental car facilities; to finance, design, construct, and operate common-use
transportation systems that move passengers between airport terminals and those consolidated car rental
facilities, and acquire vehicles for use in that system; and to finance, design, and construct terminal
modifications solely to accommodate and provide customer access to common-use transportation systems
The fees designated as a CFC shall not otherwise be used to pay for terminal expansion, gate expansion,
runway expansion, changes in hours of operation, or changes in the flights arriving or departing from the
airport.
SFO began imposing a CFC of $10.00 per rental contract on July 1, 2022.
(2)
Basis of Accounting – Schedule of Customer Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures
The accompanying Schedule of Customer Facility Charge Revenues and Expenditures (the Schedule) has
been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting which is described in note 2a of the Airport’s basic
financial statements.
111
SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
SCHEDULE OF CUSTOMER FACILITY CHARGES FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS
Year ended June 30, 2023
SUMMARY OF AUDITOR’S RESULTS
Financial Statements
Type of report the auditor issued on whether
the financial statements audited were prepared
in accordance with GAAP: Unmodified
Internal control over financial reporting:
Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No
Significant deficiency(ies) identified? Yes X None reported
Noncompliance material to financial statements noted? Yes X No
California Civil Code Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 1939.01) to Title 5 of Part 4 of Division 3,
and California Government Code Section 50474.1 through Section 50474.3 (“CFC Code”)
Internal control over major federal programs:
Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No
Significant deficiencies identified not
considered to be material weaknesses? Yes X None reported
Type of auditor’s report issued on compliance with the
CFC Code: Unmodified
Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be
reported in accordance with the CFC Code? Yes X No
112