29
the GSRAs are employees as well as students and have a right to choose. We asked for
compromise, yet she declined.
Prior to the May 19 meeting, the Board Chair reached out to report fully to all Regents
and to explain a draft of the one sentence resolution There were no surprises. The day of the
vote, we followed procedure during a two-hour discussion with the Administration. Following
the making of the motion, President Coleman articulated her opposition. After she spoke,
Regents supporting it said:
While we disagree on this issue, we have consistently supported the President;
Our vote is an affirmation of participatory democracy and the right to choose;
Our vote expresses no opinion on whether or not employees should vote to form a union;
and
If the employees are to vote for a union, we support the University’s right to enter only
into contracts where its legitimate interests are fully protected.
It is critical to note that if the GSRAs choose to form a union, this matter will be revenue
neutral to the University. GSRAs make the same wages as their fellow graduate student
employees. Over the last ten years, the wage increases for the University’s unionized
instructional employees have been significantly less on a percentage basis than those for tenured
and tenure- track faculty.
Research assistants are either organized or allowed to organize at the lead research
universities in the following states: Minnesota, Wisconsin, Washington, Massachusetts, New
Jersey (Rutgers), Iowa, Oregon and Florida.
Finally, it is noteworthy that the Administration has received assurances that the GSRAs
support the student researcher appointment process and value the time-honored faculty-student
mentoring relationship that exist today, as do we. We believe that the process and the
relationship can and should be preserved, regardless of the outcome of the organizing question.
We remain steadfast in our commitment to the excellence of the research enterprise of the
University, which has now passed the annual $1 billion mark . We are proud to be members of
the Board that has supported building the Life Sciences Institute, expanding the Institute for
Social Research, and acquiring the Pfizer research campus and we have staunchly resisted
incursions into stem cell research.
In adopting the resolution, our goal was to provide clear policy guidance. We followed
University procedure in its consideration and engaged in rigorous debate. While it is unfortunate
we did not reach unananimity, the majority’s statement and vote are consistent with the
University of Michigan’s standards and tradition and are backed both by fact and sound policy.
Respectfully submitted,
Regent Julia Donovan Darlow
Regent Laurence B. Deitch