APDS Task Force General Surgery Application and Interview Recommendations
for 2024-2025 Recruitment Cycle
Applicant Considerations
• Applicants should use available data and their unique characteristics to determine the number of
submitted applications and number of interviews to accept.
• We recommend that applicants utilize their 15 signals to indicate their top fifteen programs.
• We recommend speaking to program directors at away/audition rotations and home institutions
regarding their signaling advice and their institutional guidance.
Program Considerations
• Holistic application review is strongly recommended as part of the General Surgery residency selection
process.
• Transparency relating to program values and characteristics is strongly encouraged to provide applicants
insight into the selection process as well as program use of signaling during holistic review.
• USMLE Step 1 and COMLEX Level 1 numerical scores, when available for some applicants, should still be
deemphasized in the 2024-2025 Application Cycle. Applicants and their standardized scores should be
considered within the context of a holistic review, and programs should disclose how USMLE Step 2 and
COMLEX Level 2 will be considered.
• Programs should not offer their first round of interviews prior to Wednesday October 23, 2024. The first
round of offers should be sent between Wednesday October 23, 2024, and November 1, 2024. Programs
should provide transparency to applicants if making interview offers outside of this window.
• Programs should allow a minimum of 48 hours for the candidates to respond after any interview offer
before extending an offer to a different candidate.
• We strongly recommend programs only send the number of interview invites for which they have
available interview slots and disclose expectations about interview offer response and cancellation
policy. (e.g., if a program has 20 interview slots, only 20 invitations should be released, and additional
invitations may be offered only after applicants deny or cancel their invitation.)
• We recognize that the AAMC has advocated for virtual interviews to provide equity, cost savings, and
reduced environmental impact. Nevertheless, the task force recommends that each program, in
consultation with their GMEC, identify their values and best practices when choosing an interview
format. We do emphasize that all applicants should be considered equally by the program regardless of
the interview format that is utilized.
• We recommend that interview methods adhere to the following best practices:
- equitable opportunities to all invited applicants
- uniformity of the evaluation process within the program
- transparency about the process
- mitigation strategies to prevent bias